Powerfleet, Inc.
AIOTAbout the company
PowerFleet, Inc. provides artificial intelligence-of-things (AIoT) solutions for managing high-value enterprise and mid-market assets in North America, Israel, Africa, Europe, the Middle East, Australia, and internationally.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$1.98
-18.5% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1175 (Top 37.9%) | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -51.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -102.5% | +40.4% | N/A | N/A | -3.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-06-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-06-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-06-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 9.4% vs Rev: 6.7%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/9 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth22.4%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 50.2% -> 55.5%, operating margin -9.4% -> 4.4%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR31.3%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Profitability6% pass✓ 8✗ 27▾
15 of 16 flag AIOT's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/10 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/10 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-11.5%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)4.4% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$18.1M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-4.5%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value3.6%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.6%, ROC=37.1%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-2.15%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-5.60% -> -2.15% (delta: +3.45%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=3.19%, ROA=-2.15%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY53.7% -> 55.5%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-2.6%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-4.5%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=0.7x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-10.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/9 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue4.2%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-4.5%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-9.4% (2023) -> 4.4% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 50.2% -> 55.5%, operating margin -9.4% -> 4.4%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-6.50%; #3980/6340 (top 62.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+25.93%; #1660/3702 (top 44.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-4.46%; #3181/5226 (top 60.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0168; #1263/5884 (top 21.5%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years0/9 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #1175•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1448/2370 (Top 61.1%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Valuation8% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾
12 of 13 flag AIOT's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio0.7x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value3.6%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.6%, ROC=37.1%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)10.7x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share0.7x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=5.6%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=2.7%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.7x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share36.9x✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($2.43)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-6.50%; #3980/6340 (top 62.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+1.4572; #951/6449 (top 14.7%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+1.3859; #1425/5247 (top 27.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.00%; #2399/4519 (top 53.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-17.63%; #3844/6202 (top 62.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag AIOT's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Dreman +3 more
Current Ratio1.02✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-5.3%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-15.3%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)37.1%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.12 -> 1.13✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.40x -> 0.46x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.02✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital2.1%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-6.4%; FY2024: ROIC=-3.0%; FY2025: ROIC=2.2%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 2.2%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Valuation models25% pass✓ 1✗ 3▾
Models split on AIOT at $2.43 — fair values range $1.20–$4.08
Buffett fair value$1.60✗Buffett-51.9% margin vs $2.43Munger fair value$1.20✗Munger-102.5% margin vs $2.43Pabrai fair value$4.08✓Pabrai+40.4% margin vs $2.43Ackman fair value$2.36✗Ackman-3.0% margin vs $2.43 - Debt & Leverage33% pass✓ 6✗ 9▾
8 of 12 flag AIOT's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +5 more
Debt Levels0.49✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $227.2M vs NCA $3.9M✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.49, IC: 0.7x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.49✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-200.4M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change25.51% -> 24.03%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.02✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.49✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xInterest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=0.7x, D/EBITDA=2.9x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.49✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.4890; #2442/4210 (top 58.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾
6 of 10 flag AIOT's cash flow — Dreman, Pabrai, Marks +3 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$18.1M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$3.3M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$30.5M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=3.19%, ROA=-2.15%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)10.7x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=2.7%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive4/9 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap1.0%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share36.9x✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency5/9 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$3.3M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.00%; #2399/4519 (top 53.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.6% of shares last year.
- Buybacks
- $0
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense. | Q2 FY 2027 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q1 FY 2027 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $327.9Mcurrent | -- | -- | $685.5Mest. | $787.9Mest. | $119.1Mest. | -- | $128.1Mest. |
| Revenue | $454.5M↑7% | $115.7M↑4% | $110.8M↑6% | $443.8M↑22% | $362.5M↑171% | $133.7M↓2% | $135.9M↑8% | $126.0M |
| Operating Income | $19.0M↑416% | $1.4M↓68% | $270.0K↑113% | $19.6M↑176% | -$25.9M↓106% | -$12.6M↓80% | -$7.0M↑15% | -$8.2M |
| Net Income | -$21.3M↑48% | -$6.8M↓60% | -$8.4M↑18% | -$20.6M↑60% | -$51.0M↓798% | -$5.7M↑16% | -$6.8M↑47% | -$12.8M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.05↓67% | $-0.06↑25% | $-0.15↑65% | $-0.43↑12% | $-0.49↓2% | $-0.48↑25% | $-0.64 |
| Gross Margin | 55.1%↑1% | 53.4%↓5% | 55.2%↑2% | 55.5%↑3% | 53.7%↑7% | 50.2%↑5% | 47.8%↑1% | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2%↑396% | 1.2%↓69% | 0.2%↑112% | 4.4%↑162% | -7.1%↑24% | -9.4%↓83% | -5.1%↑21% | -6.5% |
| ROE | -4.5%↑49% | — | — | -4.3%↑62% | -11.4%↑22% | -14.7%↓48% | -9.9%↑42% | -17.1% |
| Total Debt | $233.7M↓2% | $233.7M↓2% | $236.0M↓1% | $236.0M | $237.0M↑105% | $115.8M↑696% | $14.5M↓26% | $19.5M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $477.9M↑2% | $477.9M↑2% | $482.6M↑5% | $475.5M↑6% | $446.6M↑1059% | $38.5M↓43% | $68.0M↓9% | $74.9M |
| Current Ratio | 1.02↓5% | 1.02↓5% | 1.10↑2% | 1.13↑1% | 1.12↓71% | 3.90↑103% | 1.92↑3% | 1.86 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.49↓4% | 0.49↓4% | 0.49↓6% | 0.50↓6% | 0.53↓82% | 3.00↑1306% | 0.21↓18% | 0.26 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $25.1M↑42% | -$3.6M↓165% | $8.4M↑79% | $30.5M↑1011% | -$3.3M↓176% | $4.4M↑252% | $1.2M↑123% | -$5.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | $3.3M↑176% | -$11.3M↓1058% | $3.6M↑205% | $8.8M↑138% | -$23.4M↓2603% | $933.0K↑134% | -$2.8M↑65% | -$7.8M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Electronic Equipment
AIOT vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPNVDA | $3.93T | $162.85 | $215.9B | $120.1B | 76.3% | 0.05 | 60.4% | 3.91 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 5/11 |
| INTEL CORPINTC | $317.1B | $59.66 | $52.9B | $267.0M | -0.2% | 0.41 | -4.2% | 2.02 | 3/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCTXN | $277.4B | $303.60 | $17.7B | $5.0B | 30.7% | 0.86 | 34.1% | 4.35 | 6/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |
| ANALOG DEVICES INCADI | $192.8B | $397.97 | $11.0B | $2.3B | 6.7% | 0.24 | 26.6% | 2.19 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 4/11 |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc.MSI | $87.8B | $531.20 | $11.7B | $2.2B | 89.4% | 3.49 | 25.6% | 1.04 | 2/9 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/LHX | $50.7B | $272.35 | — | $1.6B | 8.2% | 0.57 | — | 1.19 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 3/11 |
| NOKIA CORPNOK | $45.7B | $8.07 | $23.4B | $764.7M | 3.1% | 0.16 | 4.4% | 1.58 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE COERIC | $34.2B | $10.56 | $25.7B | $3.1B | 26.0% | 0.30 | 16.3% | 1.29 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 5/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |