BLACKBERRY Ltd
BBAbout the company
BlackBerry Limited provides intelligent software and services to enterprises and governments worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Secure Communications, QNX, and Licensing.
Investment snapshot
Positive
3
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 11
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$0.98
-89.0% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
10 of 12 pass — Piotroski and Asness object
Key risk
No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1020 (Top 32.9%) | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Margin of Safety | -456.2% | -559.3% | N/A | -3196.3% | N/A | N/A | -972.3% | -1434.5% | N/A | N/A | -687.6% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 vs 2025-08-31 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage83% pass✓ 13✗ 2▾
10 of 12 pass — Piotroski and Asness object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $197.1M vs NCA $325.4M✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.25, IC: 13.9x✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.25✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$69.1M✓LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change15.07% -> 15.78%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.38✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.25✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.25✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=13.9x, D/EBITDA=2.0x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.25✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.2490; #1858/4210 (top 44.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Profitability0% pass✓ 8✗ 27▾
No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion
Positive EPS (10 years)6/18 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-101.9%✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)8/18 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-21.1%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)8.8% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$67.2M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 98.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-19.1%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE10.2%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value1.6%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.6%, ROC=117.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets4.27%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-6.10% -> 4.27% (delta: +10.37%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.04%, ROA=4.27%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY73.8% -> 76.2%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue15.0%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity10.2%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=98.9x, P/B=7.0x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-6.9% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency8/18 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue13.6%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity10.2%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend1.4% (2023) -> 8.8% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 64.6% -> 76.2%, operating margin 1.4% -> 8.8%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+1.54%; #2841/6340 (top 44.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+37.85%; #1037/3702 (top 28.0%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+10.16%; #1788/5226 (top 34.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1711; #4062/5884 (top 69.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-12.4% over 3 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years2/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio7.0x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 98.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value1.6%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.6%, ROC=117.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS98.9x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)104.0x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share7.0x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=98.9x, OE Yield=1.3%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=98.9x, FCF Yield=0.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=98.9x, P/B=7.0x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share112.5x✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low275% of trailing low ($3.24)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+1.54%; #2841/6340 (top 44.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1515; #4459/6449 (top 69.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS98.9x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share23.07x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-52.3%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.1175; #4239/5247 (top 80.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.76%; #2294/4519 (top 50.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+131.77%; #242/6202 (top 3.9%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models0% pass✗ 6▾
BB overvalued: all 6 models price fair value below $8.90 (median $0.98)
Graham fair value$1.60✗Graham-456.2% margin vs $8.90Buffett fair value$1.35✗Buffett-559.3% margin vs $8.90Greenblatt fair value$0.27✗Greenblatt-3196.3% margin vs $8.90Munger fair value$0.83✗Munger-972.3% margin vs $8.90Pabrai fair value$0.58✗Pabrai-1434.5% margin vs $8.90Ackman fair value$1.13✗Ackman-687.6% margin vs $8.90 - Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
7 of 8 flag BB's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-101.9%✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 98.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-19.1%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$3.30 (2008) -> $0.09 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR-19.1% CAGR over 17 years✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency8/18 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth2.7%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 64.6% -> 76.2%, operating margin 1.4% -> 8.8%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR-9.3%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-12.4% over 3 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts20% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #1020•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #862/2370 (Top 36.4%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾
6 of 10 flag BB's cash flow — Buffett, Piotroski, Dreman +3 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$67.2M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$92.1M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$50.3M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.04%, ROA=4.27%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)104.0x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=98.9x, FCF Yield=0.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive13/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap1.8%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share112.5x✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency13/18 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$92.1M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.76%; #2294/4519 (top 50.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency50% pass✓ 5✗ 6▾
4 of 8 pass — Buffett, Munger, Akre +1 more object
Current Ratio2.38✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-18.0%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-28.0%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)117.2%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.72 -> 2.12✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.41x -> 0.44x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.38✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital6.7%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=0.9%; FY2024: ROIC=0.1%; FY2025: ROIC=4.0%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC4.0% (RR=100% x ROIC=4.0%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/4 years above 12% (latest 4.0%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 1.4% of shares last year, 0.2% over two.
- Buybacks
- $60.7M
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-08-31 2025-09-01 – 2026-08-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2027 2026-06-01 – 2026-08-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2027 2026-03-01 – 2026-05-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.2Bcurrent | -- | -- | $2.1Best. | $2.6Best. | $1.6Best. | $2.5Best. | $4.7Best. |
| Revenue | $614.0M↑14% | $163.3M↑26% | $152.9M↑26% | $549.1M↑3% | $534.9M↓30% | $759.1M↑44% | $526.3M↓27% | $718.0M |
| Operating Income | $83.7M↑218% | $33.6M↑192% | $15.3M↑665% | $48.3M↑5938% | $800.0K↓93% | $11.0M↑105% | -$206.8M↓10240% | -$2.0M |
| Net Income | $80.4M↑2971% | $33.9M↑155% | $8.5M↑347% | $53.2M↑167% | -$79.0M↑39% | -$130.2M↑82% | -$734.4M↓6220% | $12.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | -- | -- | $0.09↑169% | $-0.13↑41% | $-0.22↑84% | $-1.35↓335% | $-0.31 |
| Gross Margin | 77.9%↑4% | 77.8%↑4% | 78.3%↑6% | 76.2%↑3% | 73.8%↑14% | 64.6%↓7% | 69.7%↑7% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6%↑179% | 20.6%↑132% | 10.0%↑509% | 8.8%↑5781% | 0.1%↓90% | 1.4%↑104% | -39.3%↓14006% | -0.3% |
| ROE | 10.2%↑2730% | — | — | 7.1%↑165% | -11.0%↑35% | -16.8%↑80% | -85.7%↓11214% | 0.8% |
| Total Debt | $197.1M↑1% | $197.1M↑1% | $196.8M↑1% | $196.5M↑1% | $195.3M↑1% | $194.1M | $0 | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $791.6M↑9% | $791.6M↑9% | $750.7M↑4% | $746.0M↑4% | $719.9M↓7% | $775.1M↓10% | $856.8M↓45% | $1.6B |
| Current Ratio | 2.38↑8% | 2.38↑8% | 2.20↑4% | 2.12↑23% | 1.72↑21% | 1.42↑40% | 1.02↓61% | 2.63 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.25↓8% | 0.25↓8% | 0.26↓3% | 0.26↓3% | 0.27↑8% | 0.25 | 0.00 | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | $98.3M↑223% | $29.3M↑651% | $4.6M↑126% | $50.3M↑205% | $16.5M↑571% | -$3.5M↑99% | -$262.2M↓836% | -$28.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $92.1M↑222% | $28.1M↑806% | $1.7M↑109% | $46.5M↑247% | $13.4M↑226% | -$10.6M↑96% | -$269.5M↓649% | -$36.0M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
BB vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |