Beamr Imaging Ltd.
BMRAbout the company
Beamr Imaging Ltd. engages in the content-adaptive video compression business in the United States, Israel, and internationally. The company offers a suite of video compression software encoder solutions, including Beamr 4 H.264, Beamr 4X H.264 content adaptive, Beamr 5 HEVC, and Beamr 5X HEVC content adaptive encoders; Beamr JPEGmini photo optimization software solutions for reducing joint photographic experts group file sizes; and Beamr Cloud, a cloud-based Beamr HW-accelerated content adaptive encoding SaaS solution.
Investment snapshot
Positive
0
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 14
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
—
No comparable estimates
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #2766 (Top 89.3%) | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / Book Value per Share0.9x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio0.9x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-67.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-67.8%, ROC=-89.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xValuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-43.0%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-35.0%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.9x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($0.87)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-44.56%; #4998/6340 (top 78.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+1.1666; #1251/6449 (top 19.4%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share1.22x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.2290; #3645/5247 (top 69.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-34.99%; #3726/4519 (top 82.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-43.87%; #4950/6202 (top 79.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-5.8M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-4.7M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-4.7M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-28.10%, ROA=-35.99%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-35.0%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive1/6 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-35.0%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/6 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-4.7M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-34.99%; #3726/4519 (top 82.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-0.96 (2020) -> $-0.39 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/6 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth1.6%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 96.7% -> 89.7%, operating margin -30.2% -> -208.6%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR-0.5%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts0% pass✗ 15▾
Split decision: 14 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #2766✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability6% pass✓ 2✗ 33▾
15 of 16 flag BMR's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/7 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/7 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-93.5%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-208.6% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-5.8M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-38.2%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-67.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-67.8%, ROC=-89.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-35.99%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-15.18% -> -35.99% (delta: -20.81%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-28.10%, ROA=-35.99%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY92.2% -> 89.7%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-194.1%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-38.2%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=0.9x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-20.3% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/6 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-208.6%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-38.2%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-30.2% (2023) -> -208.6% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 96.7% -> 89.7%, operating margin -30.2% -> -208.6%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-44.56%; #4998/6340 (top 78.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+16.60%; #2314/3702 (top 62.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-38.19%; #4052/5226 (top 77.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0994; #3471/5884 (top 59.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years0/6 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
11 of 12 flag BMR's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change1.13% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities13.15✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-280.6x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag BMR's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio13.15✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-48.1%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-58.1%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-89.9%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY17.77 -> 13.15✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.14x -> 0.18x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities13.15✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-6.4%; FY2024: ROIC=-11.9%; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/4 years above 12% (latest -11.9%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.1% of shares last year, 19.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
| Metric | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.5Mcurrent | $55.6Mest. | $24.5Mest. | $9.4Mest. | -- |
| Revenue | $3.1M↑1% | $3.1M↑5% | $2.9M↑2% | $2.9M↓13% | $3.3M |
| Operating Income | -$6.5M↓101% | -$3.2M↓266% | -$878.0K↑15% | -$1.0M↓143% | -$425.0K |
| Net Income | -$6.0M↓80% | -$3.4M↓382% | -$695.0K↑44% | -$1.2M↓31% | -$952.0K |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.39↓77% | $-0.22↓144% | $-0.09↑81% | $-0.48↓30% | $-0.37 |
| Gross Margin | 89.7%↓3% | 92.2%↓5% | 96.7% | 96.6%↓1% | 97.3% |
| Operating Margin | -208.6%↓99% | -104.9%↓248% | -30.2%↑16% | -36.0%↓180% | -12.9% |
| ROE | -38.2%↓140% | -15.9%↓135% | -6.8%↓102% | 271.3%↑229% | -209.7% |
| Total Debt | -- | $250.0K↓50% | $500.0K↓3% | $513.0K↑1% | $508.0K |
| Shareholders' Equity | $15.8M↓25% | $21.1M↑105% | $10.3M↑2330% | -$460.0K↓201% | $454.0K |
| Current Ratio | 13.15↓26% | 17.77↑165% | 6.70↑374% | 1.42↑1% | 1.40 |
| Debt / Equity | — | 0.01↓76% | 0.05↑104% | -1.12↓200% | 1.12 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$4.7M↓149% | -$1.9M↓186% | -$659.0K↓2% | -$645.0K↓213% | $569.0K |
| Free Cash Flow | -$4.7M↓146% | -$1.9M↓187% | -$669.0K↓3% | -$647.0K↓215% | $565.0K |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
BMR vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |