CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC

CDNS
About the company

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. develops computational, AI-driven software, hardware, and silicon intellectual property products and solutions.

Country: United StatesPrice: $323.01Market Cap: $88.6B

Investment snapshot

12%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

2

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

5 / 9

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$58.65

-81.8% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

6 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILNEUTRALFAILFAIL · Rank #830 (Top 26.8%)NEUTRALFAILPASSFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILBUYNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-566.1%-132.7%-468.9%-537.2%N/A-450.7%-151.8%-282.0%-149.7%-740.5%-29.0%-521.7%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Cash Flow60% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

    6 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.2B
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$1.8B
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$1.7B
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=17.03%, ROA=10.92%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)39.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=79.6x, FCF Yield=1.8%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive16/18 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap2.6%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share43.3x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency27/27 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$1.8B
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.99%; #2255/4519 (top 49.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾

    No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS82.6x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio12.6x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B1,036.8
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)5.69
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value2.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.0%, ROC=330.1%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS79.6x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)39.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share12.6x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=79.6x, OE Yield=1.7%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=79.6x, FCF Yield=1.8%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=79.6x, P/B=12.6x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-450.7% (IV=$58.65 vs Price=$323.01)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share43.3x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low129% of trailing low ($250.50)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+1.56%; #2837/6340 (top 44.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.0776; #4869/6449 (top 75.5%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS79.6x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share34.24x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+136.1%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.0692; #4472/5247 (top 85.2%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.99%; #2255/4519 (top 49.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+21.59%; #1280/6202 (top 20.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models0% pass✗ 11▾

    CDNS overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $323.01 (median $58.65)

    Graham fair value$48.49
    ✗Graham-566.1% margin vs $323.01
    Buffett fair value$138.83
    ✗Buffett-132.7% margin vs $323.01
    Lynch fair value$56.78
    ✗Lynch-468.9% margin vs $323.01
    Greenblatt fair value$50.69
    ✗Greenblatt-537.2% margin vs $323.01
    Dreman fair value$58.65
    ✗Dreman-450.7% margin vs $323.01
    Munger fair value$128.27
    ✗Munger-151.8% margin vs $323.01
    Pabrai fair value$84.55
    ✗Pabrai-282.0% margin vs $323.01
    Akre fair value$129.35
    ✗Akre-149.7% margin vs $323.01
    Marks fair value$38.43
    ✗Marks-740.5% margin vs $323.01
    Ackman fair value$250.47
    ✗Ackman-29.0% margin vs $323.01
    Templeton fair value$51.96
    ✗Templeton-521.7% margin vs $323.01
  • Verdicts17% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾

    Split decision: 9 FAIL · 5 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)•BuffettNEUTRAL (6/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✗GreenblattRank #830•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (7/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepBUY (5/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Profitability31% pass✓ 17✗ 18▾

    11 of 16 flag CDNS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)22/27 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)24/27 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)25.9%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)28.2% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.2B
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)5.69
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.0%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE20.1%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value2.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.0%, ROC=330.1%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets10.92%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY11.76% -> 10.92% (delta: -0.84%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=17.03%, ROA=10.92%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue30.0%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity20.1%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=79.6x, P/B=12.6x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity24.5% (3-yr avg)
    ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-450.7% (IV=$58.65 vs Price=$323.01)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency24/26 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue28.9%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity20.1%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR14.0% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend30.6% (2023) -> 28.2% (2025)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 30.6% -> 28.2%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+1.56%; #2837/6340 (top 44.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+20.08%; #780/5226 (top 14.9%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0286; #1848/5884 (top 31.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR14.0% over 5 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 5✗ 6▾

    5 of 8 flag CDNS's efficiency — Graham, Piotroski, Dreman +2 more

    Current Ratio1.36
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)40.8%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+30.8%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)330.1%
    ✓Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY2.93 -> 2.86
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.52x -> 0.52x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.36
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital15.0%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=26.3%; FY2024: ROIC=22.8%; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)4/4 years above 12% (latest 22.8%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Debt & Leverage50% pass✓ 8✗ 7▾

    6 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more object

    Debt Levels0.36
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $2.0B vs NCA $887.4M
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.36, IC: 14.0x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.36
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-532.4M
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.36
    ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.36
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=14.0x, D/EBITDA=1.2x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.36
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.3612; #2156/4210 (top 51.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth50% pass✓ 7✗ 6▾

    4 of 8 pass — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +1 more object

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)5.69
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.0%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 56.8% vs Rev: 17.6%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency24/26 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth14.1%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency5/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR14.0% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 30.6% -> 28.2%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR14.6%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR14.0% over 5 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Business Services
Size: Large Cap($88.6B)
Revenue: $5.3B+14.1% YoY
Net Income: $1.1B+5.1% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin28.2%
Return on Equity20.3%
Debt / Equity--
Current Ratio2.86
EPS (Diluted)$4.06+5.5% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$925.0M
Buybacks (2y)$1.5B
Shares Retired1.9% / 0.7% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 1.9% of shares last year, 0.7% over two.

Buybacks
$925.0M
Dividends
—

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
23.6% = 22.0% + 1.3%
FY23
23.6% = 22.6% + 0.8%
FY24
0.8% = 1.4% + −0.6%
FY25
5.5% = 5.1% + 0.4%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-19
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-21
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-14
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-13
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-02-22
Market Cap$88.6Bcurrent------$63.0Best.$64.5Best.$61.8Best.$39.5Best.$34.1Best.
Revenue$6.1B↑18%$1.6B↑22%$1.6B↑24%$1.5B↑19%$5.3B↑14%$4.6B↑13%$4.1B↑15%$3.6B↑19%$3.0B
Operating Income$1.8B↑19%$428.7M↑1%$450.3M↑86%$431.3M↑19%$1.5B↑10%$1.4B↑8%$1.3B↑17%$1.1B↑38%$779.1M
Net Income$1.4B↑30%$289.7M↑1%$367.1M↑129%$335.7M↑23%$1.1B↑5%$1.1B↑1%$1.0B↑23%$849.0M↑22%$696.0M
EPS (Diluted)--$1.05$1.33↑125%$1.23↑23%$4.06↑5%$3.85↑1%$3.82↑24%$3.09↑24%$2.50
Gross Margin—————————
Operating Margin28.9%↑1%26.2%↓17%28.4%↑50%29.3%↑1%28.2%↓3%29.1%↓5%30.6%↑1%30.1%↑16%26.1%
ROE20.1%↓2%———20.3%↓10%22.6%↓26%30.6%↓1%30.9%↑22%25.4%
Total Debt$2.5B$2.5B$0$425.0M--$0↓100%$349.3M$0$0
Shareholders' Equity$6.9B↑32%$6.9B↑32%$6.9B↑37%$6.6B↑37%$5.5B↑17%$4.7B↑37%$3.4B↑24%$2.7B$2.7B
Current Ratio1.36↓55%1.36↓55%1.74↓38%1.47↓52%2.86↓3%2.93↑136%1.24↓2%1.27↓28%1.77
Debt / Equity0.360.360.000.06—0.00↓100%0.100.000.00
Operating Cash Flow$2.0B↑22%$423.7M↑36%$634.9M↑68%$355.8M↓27%$1.7B↑37%$1.3B↓7%$1.3B↑9%$1.2B↑13%$1.1B
Free Cash Flow$1.8B↑19%$361.9M↑31%$582.3M↑75%$307.0M↓34%$1.6B↑42%$1.1B↓10%$1.2B↑11%$1.1B↑8%$1.0B

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Business Services

CDNS vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$5.3BMedian
Net Income$1.1BTop 25%
ROE20.3%Median
D/E—
Op. Margin28.2%Top 25%
Curr. Ratio2.86Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP$122.3B$309.93$21.9B$4.4B73.2%0.8224.2%1.054/95/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA$52.9B$209.70$7.5B$887.0M13.1%0.2215.4%1.051/94/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
Rubrik, Inc.RBRK$22.6B$109.88$1.3B$348.8M67.1%—-26.2%1.691/90/92/70/3F-Score 62/11
AECOMACM$9.1B$70.50$16.1B$561.8M22.5%1.096.4%1.141/93/93/71/3F-Score 82/11
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT$6.2B$152.07$1.2B$70.7M942.8%—6.3%1.951/92/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
WPP plcWPP$6.0B$27.79$18.2B$289.5M-8.5%1.942.8%0.891/92/91/70/3F-Score 32/11
VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS$5.6B$48.94$623.5M$129.3M-21.6%0.76-23.5%1.971/90/91/70/3F-Score 51/11
ROBERT HALF INC.RHI$4.3B$42.00$5.4B$133.0M10.4%—1.4%1.532/95/91/70/3F-Score 52/11