CERUS CORP

CERS
About the company

Cerus Corporation operates as a biomedical products company. The company focuses on developing and commercializing the INTERCEPT Blood System to enhance blood safety. The company offers INTERCEPT Blood System, a proprietary technology for controlling biological replication that is designed to reduce blood-borne pathogens in donated blood components intended for transfusion.

Country: United StatesPrice: $1.99Market Cap: $400.9M

Investment snapshot

18%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

3

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

2 / 11

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$0.11

-94.2% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

All 13 investors flag CERS's valuation

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #1989 (Top 64.2%)PASSFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILPASSFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A-1709.1%N/AN/AN/A-1558.3%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Valuation0% pass✗ 28▾

      All 13 investors flag CERS's valuation

      Price / 3-yr avg EPS
      ✗Graham<= 15x
      Price-to-Book Ratio6.0x
      ✗Graham<= 1.5x
      P/E x P/B
      ✗Graham<= 22.5
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise Value-1.9%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-1.9%, ROC=-13.8%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / EPS
      ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price / (CFO / Shares)79.1x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Price / Book Value per Share6.0x
      ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-4.7%
      ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=0.3%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=6.0x
      ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / FCF per Share345.1x
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Price vs. Trailing Low157% of trailing low ($1.27)
      ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Net income / market capitalization-1.82%; #3532/6340 (top 55.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.1888; #4239/6449 (top 65.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
      ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share6.08x
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change-45.8%
      ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization+0.5832; #2416/5247 (top 46.0%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.12%; #2520/4519 (top 55.8%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+5.29%; #2138/6202 (top 34.5%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Valuation models0% pass✗ 2▾

      CERS overvalued: all 2 models price fair value below $1.99 (median $0.11)

      Munger fair value$0.11
      ✗Munger-1709.1% margin vs $1.99
      Ackman fair value$0.12
      ✗Ackman-1558.3% margin vs $1.99
    • Profitability6% pass✓ 5✗ 30▾

      15 of 16 flag CERS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

      Positive EPS (10 years)1/28 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)2/28 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-52.1%
      ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-3.7% (latest)
      ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-16.7M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
      ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE-9.7%
      ✗Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise Value-1.9%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-1.9%, ROC=-13.8%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets-7.04%
      ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY-10.41% -> -7.04% (delta: +3.37%)
      ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=2.18%, ROA=-7.04%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-6.5%
      ✗Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-9.7%
      ✗Dreman> 12%
      Margin of SafetyP/B=6.0x
      ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
      Return on Equity-44.3% (3-yr avg)
      ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency2/19 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue-3.7%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity-9.7%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend-16.1% (2023) -> -3.7% (2025)
      ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -16.1% -> -3.7%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Net income / market capitalization-1.82%; #3532/6340 (top 55.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Gross profit / total assets
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity-9.66%; #3398/5226 (top 65.0%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0601; #2813/5884 (top 47.8%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years0/10 years positive
      ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾

      7 of 8 flag CERS's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +4 more

      Current Ratio1.96
      ✗Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-27.5%
      ✗Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC-37.5%
      ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-13.8%
      ✗Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY2.39 -> 1.73
      ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.00x -> 1.05x
      ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.96
      ✓Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital-1.4%
      ✗Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-17.9%; FY2024: ROIC=-8.0%; FY2025: ROIC=-4.6%
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
      ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -4.6%)
      ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
    • Verdicts20% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

      Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #1989✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (1/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
    • Growth25% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾

      6 of 8 flag CERS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 47.1% vs Rev: 16.1%
      ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction
      ✗DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR
      ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency2/19 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth7.8%
      ✓Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency5/5 years with positive EPS growth
      ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -16.1% -> -3.7%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR15.4%
      ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Cash Flow30% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾

      7 of 10 flag CERS's cash flow — Buffett, Dreman, Pabrai +4 more

      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-16.7M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      FCF Positive and Growing$0.5M
      ✓LynchPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$4.8M
      ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=2.18%, ROA=-7.04%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)79.1x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=0.3%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      FCF Positive2/17 years FCF positive
      ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
      (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap0.1%
      ✗Ackman>= 4%
      Price / FCF per Share345.1x
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency2/17 years positive
      ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$0.5M
      ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.12%; #2520/4519 (top 55.8%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Debt & Leverage33% pass✓ 6✗ 9▾

      8 of 12 flag CERS's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +5 more

      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.84
      ✗Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
      ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.84, IC: -0.4x
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity0.84
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt
      ✗LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
      ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.96
      ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Debt Levels0.84
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-0.4x, D/EBITDA=N/A
      ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.84
      ✓Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.8368; #3029/4210 (top 71.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Medical Equipment
    SIC Sector: Measuring & Medical Instruments
    Size: Small Cap($400.9M)
    Revenue: $233.8M+16.1% YoY
    Net Income: $15.6M+25.3% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin-3.7%
    Return on Equity-24.3%
    Debt / Equity1.31
    Current Ratio1.73
    EPS (Diluted)$-0.08
    Shares Retired−3.4% / −6.0% 2y

    Shareholder Return

    Fiscal 2025

    Issued 3.4% of shares last year, 6.0% issued over two.

    Buybacks
    —
    Dividends
    —

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

    MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

    2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

    Q3 FY 2026

    2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

    Q2 FY 2026

    2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

    Q1 FY 2026

    2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

    Sources
    FY 2025
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2026-03-02
    FY 2024
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2025-02-26
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2024-03-05
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-03-01
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2022-02-22
    Market Cap$400.9Mcurrent------$447.8Mest.$347.4Mest.$328.1Mest.$557.7Mest.$931.1Mest.
    Revenue--$57.7M$57.4M$53.7M$233.8M↑16%$201.3M↑8%$186.8M↓1%$188.3M↑18%$159.5M
    Operating Income-$2.5M↑74%$383.0K↓69%-$1.9M↑46%-$354.0K↑94%-$8.7M↑39%-$14.2M↑53%-$30.1M↑12%-$34.1M↑30%-$48.9M
    Net Income-$7.3M↑54%-$550.0K↓2795%-$2.9M↑48%-$1.6M↑79%-$15.6M↑25%-$20.9M↑44%-$37.5M↑12%-$42.8M↑21%-$54.4M
    EPS (Diluted)--$0.00$-0.01↑67%$-0.01↑75%$-0.08↑27%$-0.11↑48%$-0.21↑13%$-0.24↑25%$-0.32
    Gross Margin—————————
    Operating Margin—0.7%-3.2%-0.7%-3.7%↑47%-7.1%↑56%-16.1%↑11%-18.1%↑41%-30.7%
    ROE-9.7%↑63%———-24.3%↑35%-37.3%↑48%-71.2%↓13%-63.3%↑2%-64.3%
    Total Debt$63.4M↓25%$63.4M↓25%$64.9M↓24%$84.8M$83.9M$84.2M↑5%$79.8M↑14%$69.8M↑375%$14.7M
    Shareholders' Equity$75.7M↑23%$75.7M↑23%$70.0M↑26%$67.6M↑22%$64.2M↑14%$56.1M↑7%$52.6M↓22%$67.6M↓20%$84.6M
    Current Ratio1.96↑4%1.96↑4%1.83↓8%1.63↓30%1.73↓28%2.39↑12%2.14↑47%1.45↓39%2.38
    Debt / Equity0.84↓39%0.84↓39%0.93↓39%1.26↓18%1.31↓13%1.50↓1%1.52↑47%1.03↑494%0.17
    Operating Cash Flow$3.5M↓2%$3.0M↑56%-$2.7M↓9%-$3.0M↓261%$4.8M↓57%$11.4M↑126%-$43.2M↓69%-$25.6M↑24%-$33.9M
    Free Cash Flow$494.0K↑194%$2.4M↑2471%-$3.5M↓21%-$3.3M↓243%$1.1M↓87%$8.5M↑118%-$47.8M↓73%-$27.6M↑21%-$34.8M

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Medical Equipment

    CERS vs Peers — Financial Grading

    Revenue$233.8MBottom 25%
    Net Income$15.6MBottom 25%
    ROE-24.3%Bottom 25%
    D/E1.31Bottom 25%
    Op. Margin-3.7%Bottom 25%
    Curr. Ratio1.73Bottom 25%
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    ALCON INCALC$35.6B$74.12$10.4B$980.0M4.4%0.2113.1%2.122/91/93/70/3F-Score 64/11
    KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NVPHG$29.7B$30.34$21.0B$1.1B8.2%0.648.0%1.321/91/91/70/3F-Score 53/11
    WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INCWST$29.0B$416.42$3.1B$493.7M15.5%0.0619.0%3.024/96/96/71/3F-Score 75/11
    SMITH & NEPHEW PLCSNN$13.1B$31.28$6.2B$625.0M11.8%0.5912.9%2.572/90/91/70/3F-Score 64/11
    MSA Safety IncMSA$6.7B$174.17$1.9B$278.9M20.4%0.4219.8%3.015/95/94/71/3F-Score 57/11
    STAAR SURGICAL COSTAA$1.3B$26.39$239.4M$80.4M-23.4%—-38.3%4.552/92/92/70/3F-Score 33/11
    ARTIVION, INC.AORT$931.9M$19.10$441.3M$9.8M2.2%0.487.6%3.532/90/90/70/3F-Score 71/11
    InMode Ltd.INMD$763.6M$13.27$370.5M$93.8M13.7%—23.0%9.885/93/90/73/3F-Score 44/11