BingEx Ltd

FLX
About the company

BingEx Limited, through its subsidiaries, provides on-demand dedicated courier services under the FlashEx brand name in the People's Republic of China. The company offers Flash-Riders as service who provides the courier services. It serves individual and business customers, including local merchants, small and medium sized enterprises, restaurants, and logistics players through its mobile platform and website. The company was incorporated in 2014 and is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Country: ChinaPrice: $1.53Market Cap: $111.9M

Investment snapshot

12%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

5 / 10

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$0.56

-63.1% vs price

Models with upside

3 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

Models split on FLX at $1.53 — fair values range $0.06–$0.95

Key risk

No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILBUY · Rank #33 (Top 1.1%)NEUTRALPASSFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+46.3%N/AN/A-750.0%N/AN/A+8.9%N/AN/AN/A+10.5%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-04-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Valuation models75% pass✓ 3✗ 1▾

    Models split on FLX at $1.53 — fair values range $0.06–$0.95

    Graham fair value$0.95
    ✓Graham+46.3% margin vs $1.53
    Greenblatt fair value$0.06
    ✗Greenblatt-750.0% margin vs $1.53
    Munger fair value$0.56
    ✓Munger+8.9% margin vs $1.53
    Ackman fair value$0.57
    ✓Ackman+10.5% margin vs $1.53
  • Cash Flow70% pass✓ 9✗ 3▾

    7 of 10 pass — Buffett, Piotroski and Oshaughnessy object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$14.1M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$14.2M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.69%, ROA=8.49%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)7.9x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=6.9x, FCF Yield=12.6%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive3/4 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap12.6%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share7.9x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency3/4 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$14.1M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+12.63%; #524/4519 (top 11.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation54% pass✓ 18✗ 10▾

    7 of 13 pass — Graham, Lynch, Marks +3 more object

    Price / Book Value per Share0.9x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.9x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 6.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value20.9%
    ✓Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=20.9%, ROC=133.7%
    ✓GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS6.9x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)7.9x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=6.9x
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=6.9x, FCF Yield=12.6%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=6.9x, P/B=0.9x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share7.9x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low105% of trailing low ($0.49)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+13.98%; #402/6340 (top 6.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.0672; #1372/6449 (top 21.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS6.9x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.94x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+5.0998; #530/5247 (top 10.1%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+12.63%; #524/4519 (top 11.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-37.80%; #4721/6202 (top 76.1%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 6.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency2/4 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-3.9%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 8.7% -> 11.8%, operating margin 0.2% -> 1.2%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

    11 of 12 flag FLX's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest Coverage
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.35
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Verdicts17% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾

    Split decision: 10 FAIL · 5 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✓GreenblattRank #33•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Profitability19% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾

    13 of 16 flag FLX's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)1/5 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)2/5 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-3.3%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)1.2% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 6.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE13.1%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value20.9%
    ✓Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=20.9%, ROC=133.7%
    ✓GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets8.49%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-11.86% -> 8.49% (delta: +20.35%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.69%, ROA=8.49%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY11.0% -> 11.8%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue2.7%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity13.1%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=6.9x, P/B=0.9x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-3.3% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency2/4 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue1.2%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity13.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend0.2% (2023) -> 1.2% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 8.7% -> 11.8%, operating margin 0.2% -> 1.2%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+13.98%; #402/6340 (top 6.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+36.41%; #1108/3702 (top 29.9%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+13.10%; #1367/5226 (top 26.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1025; #3512/5884 (top 59.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾

    5 of 8 flag FLX's efficiency — Buffett, Piotroski, Munger +2 more

    Current Ratio2.35
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)133.7%
    ✓Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.87 -> 2.35
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY3.62x -> 3.10x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.35
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Transportation
SIC Sector: Motor Freight & Warehousing
Size: Micro Cap($111.9M)
Revenue: $570.6M-6.8% YoY
Net Income: $15.6M+177.9% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin1.2%
Return on Equity13.1%
Debt / Equity--
Current Ratio2.35
EPS (Diluted)$0.07
Buybacks (1y)$7.8M
Shares Retired−111.6%

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 111.6% of shares last year.

Buybacks
$7.8M
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

MetricFY 2025
Sources
  • 20-F · 2026-04-24
FY 2024
Sources
  • 20-F · 2025-04-25
FY 2023
Sources
  • 20-F · 2025-04-25
FY 2022
Sources
  • 20-F · 2025-04-25
FY 2021
Sources
  • 20-F · 2025-04-25
Market Cap$111.9Mcurrent$797.4Mest.$931.7Mest.----
Revenue$570.6M↓7%$612.2M↓4%$637.2M↑11%$574.8M--
Operating Income$6.6M↑287%-$3.5M↓336%$1.5M↑105%-$29.1M--
Net Income$15.6M↑178%-$20.1M↓229%$15.5M↑160%-$25.9M--
EPS (Diluted)$0.07↑122%$-0.34↓389%$-0.07----
Gross Margin11.8%↑7%11.0%↑26%8.7%↑35%6.5%—
Operating Margin1.2%↑301%-0.6%↓345%0.2%↑105%-5.1%—
ROE13.1%↑167%-19.6%↓331%-4.5%↓159%7.7%—
Total Debt----------
Shareholders' Equity$119.4M↑17%$102.4M↑130%-$342.2M↓1%-$338.2M↓15%-$294.2M
Current Ratio2.35↑26%1.87↑33%1.41——
Debt / Equity—————
Operating Cash Flow$14.2M↑4619%$299.9K↓95%$6.4M↑152%-$12.5M--
Free Cash Flow$14.1M↑9744%$143.6K↓98%$6.0M↑146%-$13.0M--

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Transportation

FLX vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$570.6MBottom 25%
Net Income$15.6MBottom 25%
ROE13.1%Bottom 25%
D/E—
Op. Margin1.2%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio2.35Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
UNION PACIFIC CORPUNP$179.7B$302.44$24.5B$7.1B38.7%1.7240.2%0.912/94/94/70/3F-Score 73/11
CSX CORPCSX$95.9B$52.05$14.1B$2.9B22.0%1.4332.1%0.812/94/93/70/3F-Score 53/11
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTDRCL$86.5B$323.27$17.9B$4.3B42.5%2.1327.4%0.181/91/91/70/3F-Score 73/11
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COCNI$76.3B$127.18————————————
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPNSC$73.6B$327.88$12.2B$2.9B18.5%1.1035.8%0.853/96/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
MPLX LPMPLX$58.0B$57.25$13.0B$5.0B34.6%1.7945.7%1.232/94/94/71/3F-Score 68/11
Carnival Corp Ltd.CCL$39.3B$29.23$26.6B$2.8B22.5%2.1716.8%0.321/91/92/70/3F-Score 74/11
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.ODFL$36.0B$174.54$5.5B$1.0B23.7%0.0124.8%1.443/97/95/71/3F-Score 65/11