FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC

FLXS
About the company

Flexsteel Industries, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, distributes, imports, and markets residential furniture products in the United States. The company offers furniture, such as sofas, loveseats, chairs, reclining rocking chairs, swivel rockers, sofa beds, convertible bedding units, occasional tables, desks, dining tables and chairs, kitchen storage, bedroom furniture, and outdoor furniture. It distributes its products through its e-commerce channel and direct sales force. The company was founded in 1893 and is based in Dubuque, Iowa.

Country: United StatesPrice: $74.83Market Cap: $311.4M

Investment snapshot

41%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

6

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 7

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$42.80

-42.8% vs price

Models with upside

3 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

8 of 10 pass — Dreman and Oshaughnessy object

Key risk

11 of 12 flag FLXS's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILBUY · Rank #541 (Top 17.5%)PASSPASSPASSFAILFAILFAILPASSPASSPASSNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-48.4%+22.3%-649.0%-113.3%N/A-66.1%+3.0%-347.5%-74.8%-287.7%+30.5%-163.5%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-08-22

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Cash Flow80% pass✓ 10✗ 2▾

    8 of 10 pass — Dreman and Oshaughnessy object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$20.6M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$42.4M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$37.0M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=13.09%, ROA=7.13%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)10.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=21.1x, FCF Yield=10.8%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive16/22 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap10.7%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share11.7x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency21/22 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$42.4M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+13.61%; #469/4519 (top 10.4%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

    11 of 12 flag FLXS's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest Coverage
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.18
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=380.2x, D/EBITDA=N/A
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation23% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾

    10 of 13 flag FLXS's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more

    Net income / market capitalization+10.03%; #653/6340 (top 10.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS24.9x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio2.4x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B58.60
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)7.49
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value9.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=9.8%, ROC=25.0%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS21.1x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)10.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share2.4x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=21.1x, OE Yield=5.2%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=21.1x, FCF Yield=10.8%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=21.1x, P/B=2.4x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-66.1% (IV=$45.05 vs Price=$74.83)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share11.7x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low246% of trailing low ($30.37)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.4240; #3169/6449 (top 49.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS21.1x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.18
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share2.35x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+29.7%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+1.4857; #1345/5247 (top 25.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+13.61%; #469/4519 (top 10.4%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+54.32%; #600/6202 (top 9.7%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Profitability25% pass✓ 16✗ 19▾

    12 of 16 flag FLXS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more

    Net income / market capitalization+10.03%; #653/6340 (top 10.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive EPS (10 years)15/26 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)23/26 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)8.6%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)6.0% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$20.6M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)1.31
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)7.49
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR2.8%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE23.6%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value9.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=9.8%, ROC=25.0%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets7.13%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY7.13% -> 7.13% (delta: +0.00%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=13.09%, ROA=7.13%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY22.2% -> 22.2%
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue8.9%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity23.6%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=21.1x, P/B=2.4x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity10.3% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-66.1% (IV=$45.05 vs Price=$74.83)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency23/25 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue8.7%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity23.6%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR2.8% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend4.1% (2023) -> 6.0% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 21.1% -> 22.2%, operating margin 4.1% -> 6.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Gross profit / total assets+46.43%; #752/3702 (top 20.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+23.65%; #650/5226 (top 12.4%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0240; #1651/5884 (top 28.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR2.8% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years8/10 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾

    6 of 8 flag FLXS's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

    Current Ratio2.18
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)9.1%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-0.9%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)25.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY2.78 -> 2.78
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.56x -> 1.56x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.18
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=8.7%; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/3 years above 12% (latest 8.7%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Valuation models27% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    Models split on FLXS at $74.83 — fair values range $9.99–$107.72

    Graham fair value$50.41
    ✗Graham-48.4% margin vs $74.83
    Buffett fair value$96.26
    ✓Buffett+22.3% margin vs $74.83
    Lynch fair value$9.99
    ✗Lynch-649.0% margin vs $74.83
    Greenblatt fair value$35.09
    ✗Greenblatt-113.3% margin vs $74.83
    Dreman fair value$45.05
    ✗Dreman-66.1% margin vs $74.83
    Munger fair value$77.16
    ✓Munger+3.0% margin vs $74.83
    Pabrai fair value$16.72
    ✗Pabrai-347.5% margin vs $74.83
    Akre fair value$42.80
    ✗Akre-74.8% margin vs $74.83
    Marks fair value$19.30
    ✗Marks-287.7% margin vs $74.83
    Ackman fair value$107.72
    ✓Ackman+30.5% margin vs $74.83
    Templeton fair value$28.40
    ✗Templeton-163.5% margin vs $74.83
  • Growth38% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾

    5 of 8 flag FLXS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Ackman +2 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)7.49
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR2.8%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 6.7% vs Rev: 3.4%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$1.61 (2009) -> $3.55 (2025)
    ✓DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR5.1% CAGR over 16 years
    ✓Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency23/25 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth4.8%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR2.8% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 21.1% -> 22.2%, operating margin 4.1% -> 6.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR-1.6%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR2.8% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Verdicts50% pass✓ 7✗ 7▾

    Split decision: 7 FAIL · 6 PASS · 3 NEUTRAL

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✓GreenblattRank #541✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Consumer Goods
SIC Sector: Furniture Manufacturing
Size: Small Cap($311.4M)
Revenue: $441.1M+0.0% YoY
Net Income: $20.2M+0.0% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin6.0%
Return on Equity12.0%
Debt / Equity--
Current Ratio2.78
EPS (Diluted)$3.55+0.0% 1y
Shares Retired0.6% / −1.5% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 0.6% of shares last year, 1.5% issued over two.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
$3.6M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
878.6% = 697.5% + 22.7%
FY23
−30.3% = −28.8% + −2.2%
FY24
85.9% = 91.4% + −2.9%
FY25
0.0% = 0.0% + 0.0%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income.

Q1 · 2026-09-30

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-08-22
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-08-22
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-08-30
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-08-25
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-08-26
Market Cap$311.4Mcurrent--$210.3Mest.$255.8Mest.$142.7Mest.$93.0Mest.$119.1Mest.
Revenue$462.7M↑3%$114.0M↑3%$441.1M$441.1M↑7%$412.8M↑5%$393.7M↓28%$544.3M
Operating Income$40.5M↑37%$6.9M↓23%$26.6M$26.6M↑56%$17.1M↑62%$10.5M↑59%$6.6M
Net Income$31.2M↑34%$5.4M↓26%$20.2M$20.2M↑91%$10.5M↓29%$14.8M↑698%$1.9M
EPS (Diluted)--$1.24↓5%$3.55$3.55↑86%$1.91↓30%$2.74↑879%$0.28
Gross Margin24.3%↑7%22.0%↓6%22.2%22.2%↑5%21.1%↑17%18.0%↑35%13.4%
Operating Margin8.7%↑32%6.0%↓26%6.0%6.0%↑46%4.1%↑55%2.7%↑120%1.2%
ROE23.6%↑74%—12.0%12.0%↑71%7.0%↓33%10.4%↑641%1.4%
Total Debt--------$4.8M↓83%$28.3M↓25%$37.7M
Shareholders' Equity$132.1M↓23%$132.1M↓23%$167.9M$167.9M↑12%$150.4M↑6%$141.6M↑8%$131.6M
Current Ratio2.18↓27%2.18↓27%2.782.78↑8%2.57↓17%3.10↑5%2.94
Debt / Equity————0.03↓84%0.20↓30%0.29
Operating Cash Flow$45.9M↑19%-$1.5M↓136%$37.0M$37.0M↑16%$31.9M↑39%$23.0M↑188%$8.0M
Free Cash Flow$42.4M↑23%-$2.4M↓188%$33.7M$33.7M↑24%$27.1M↑49%$18.2M↑340%$4.1M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Consumer Goods

FLXS vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$441.1MBottom 25%
Net Income$20.2MBottom 25%
ROE12.0%Bottom 25%
D/E—
Op. Margin6.0%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio2.78Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
UNILEVER PLCUL$142.6B$66.21$59.3B$11.1B61.0%1.6817.9%0.792/94/94/71/3F-Score 86/11
ECOLAB INC.ECL$86.7B$309.27$16.1B$2.1B21.2%0.8417.0%1.083/95/93/71/3F-Score 65/11
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COCL$79.2B$99.67$20.4B$2.1B3948.1%147.8916.2%0.832/95/93/71/3F-Score 53/11
ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INCEL$40.5B$111.75$14.3B$1.1B-29.3%1.89-5.5%1.302/94/92/70/3F-Score 61/11
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC /DE/CHD$26.7B$113.00$6.2B$736.8M18.4%0.5517.4%1.073/97/93/71/3F-Score 74/11
CANON INCCAJPY$25.2B$30.28——————3/91/91/71/3F-Score 75/11
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.SGI$14.0B$60.76$7.5B$384.1M12.4%1.5110.1%0.831/95/92/71/3F-Score 52/11
INTERPARFUMS INCIPAR$4.3B$133.37$1.5B$168.4M19.1%0.2018.2%2.994/95/96/71/3F-Score 57/11