IMA Tech
IMAAInvestment snapshot
Positive
0
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 14
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$0.01
+108.3% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
All 10 investors flag IMAA's cash flow
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +52.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-01-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-01-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-01-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-01-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-01-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-01-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2026-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-01-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-01-31 · Price history 2026-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2025-07-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-01-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-01-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2026-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-05-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Cash Flow0% pass✗ 12▾
All 10 investors flag IMAA's cash flow
Free Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-0.1M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-40.49%, ROA=-24.85%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF Yield✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/3 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/3 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth206.4%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -257.7% -> -99.5%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾
All 8 investors flag IMAA's efficiency
Current Ratio0.10✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-13.1%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-23.1%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY0.04 -> 0.04✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.25x -> 0.25x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.10✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-12.5%; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/1 years above 12% (latest -12.5%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Verdicts0% pass✗ 14▾
Split decision: 14 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (0/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 2)✗DremanFAIL (0/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)✗SchlossFAIL (0/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability6% pass✓ 2✗ 33▾
15 of 16 flag IMAA's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/4 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/4 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROEN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-275.0%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-275.0%, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-24.85%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-24.85% -> -24.85% (delta: +0.00%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-40.49%, ROA=-24.85%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY0.0% -> 0.0%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman> 12%Margin of Safety✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/3 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-76.2%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-257.7% (2023) -> -99.5% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -257.7% -> -99.5%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-259.53%; #5740/6340 (top 90.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+0.00%; #3481/3702 (top 94.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0697; #3015/5884 (top 51.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾
11 of 12 flag IMAA's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.10✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation8% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾
12 of 13 flag IMAA's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-275.0%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-275.0%, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per ShareN/A (negative BVPS)✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=7.6%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF Yield✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical Average✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($0.00)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-259.53%; #5740/6340 (top 90.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization-3.3788; #6189/6449 (top 96.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-1000.2%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+3.4054; #728/5247 (top 13.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-94.00%; #6050/6202 (top 97.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 23.0% of shares last year, 27.7% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-01-31 2025-02-01 – 2026-01-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization. | Q3 FY 2026 2025-11-01 – 2026-01-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, operating cash flow. | Q2 FY 2026 2025-08-01 – 2025-10-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization. | Q1 FY 2026 2025-05-01 – 2025-07-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.5Kcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $2.0Mest. | $2.0Mest. | -- | -- |
| Revenue | $83.5K | $0↓100% | $65.7K↑557% | $4.4K↓6% | $55.4K | $55.4K↑413% | $10.8K | -- |
| Operating Income | -$63.7K↓954% | -$14.4K↓1185% | -$1.9K↑85% | -$20.9K↓222% | -$55.1K | -$55.1K↓98% | -$27.8K | -- |
| Net Income | -$63.7K↓58% | -$14.4K↓1185% | -$1.9K↑85% | -$20.9K↓22% | -$55.1K | -$55.1K↓98% | -$27.8K | -- |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -76.2% | — | -2.9%↑98% | -474.1%↓230% | -99.5% | -99.5%↑61% | -257.7% | — |
| ROE | 76.8%↓63% | — | — | — | 120.7% | 120.7%↓17% | 144.8% | — |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | $194.9K↑1520% | $12.0K |
| Shareholders' Equity | -$82.9K↓331% | -$82.9K↓331% | -$68.4K↓233% | -$66.5K↓89% | -$45.6K | -$45.6K↓138% | -$19.2K↓584% | $4.0K |
| Current Ratio | 0.10↑206% | 0.10↑206% | 0.10↑161% | 0.05↑2730% | 0.04 | 0.04↑35% | 0.03↓96% | 0.63 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | -10.14↓435% | 3.03 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$36.7K↓177% | -$201↑100% | -$32.2K↓76% | $7.5K↑173% | -$89.7K | -$89.7K↓219% | $75.4K | -- |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
IMAA vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |