Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
INSEAbout the company
Inspired Entertainment, Inc., a gaming technology company, supplies content, platform, and other products and services to online and land-based regulated lottery, betting, and gaming operators in the United Kingdom, Greece, and internationally. It operates in four segments: Gaming, Virtual Sports, Interactive, and Leisure.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$8.50
+93.2% vs price
Models with upside
5 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
Models split on INSE at $4.40 — fair values range $2.85–$9.74
Key risk
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one debt & leverage criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | BUY · Rank #290 (Top 9.4%) | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | +54.8% | N/A | +53.2% | +48.5% | +30.9% | N/A | N/A | +47.9% | -54.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models83% pass✓ 5✗ 1▾
Models split on INSE at $4.40 — fair values range $2.85–$9.74
Greenblatt fair value$9.74✓Greenblatt+54.8% margin vs $4.40Dreman fair value$9.40✓Dreman+53.2% margin vs $4.40Munger fair value$8.55✓Munger+48.5% margin vs $4.40Pabrai fair value$6.37✓Pabrai+30.9% margin vs $4.40Ackman fair value$8.45✓Ackman+47.9% margin vs $4.40Templeton fair value$2.85✗Templeton-54.4% margin vs $4.40 - Cash Flow80% pass✓ 10✗ 2▾
8 of 10 pass — Buffett and Oshaughnessy object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-0.3M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$16.3M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$52.0M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.82%, ROA=-3.86%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)2.3x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=14.1%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive10/11 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap13.7%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share7.3x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency11/11 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$16.3M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+14.05%; #453/4519 (top 10.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency63% pass✓ 7✗ 4▾
5 of 8 pass — Munger, Akre and Sleep object
Current Ratio2.16✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)10.3%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+0.3%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)40.9%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.54 -> 2.23✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.68x -> 0.69x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.16✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital10.3%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=12.9%; FY2024: ROIC=7.9%; FY2025: ROIC=7.2%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)2/5 years above 12% (latest 7.2%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Where It Falls Short
- Debt & Leverage0% pass✓ 2✗ 13▾
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one debt & leverage criterion
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $322.9M vs NCA $80.7M✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: N/A (negative equity), IC: 1.0x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / EquityN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-287.6M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change66.65% -> 78.47%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.16✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt LevelsN/A (non-positive equity)✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=1.0x, D/EBITDA=3.4x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -4.1% vs Rev: -16.5%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-1.27 (2015) -> $-0.58 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR24.7% CAGR over 6 years✓Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency4/11 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth2.4%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin 12.0% -> 10.0%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR8.8%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-15.1% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Profitability6% pass✓ 6✗ 29▾
15 of 16 flag INSE's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)4/13 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)4/13 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)10.0% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-0.3M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROEN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value10.0%✓Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=10.0%, ROC=40.9%✓GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-3.86%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY14.78% -> -3.86% (delta: -18.65%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.82%, ROA=-3.86%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue0.4%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman> 12%Margin of Safety✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value53.7% (IV=$9.50 vs Price=$4.40)✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency4/11 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue15.9%✓Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend12.0% (2023) -> 10.0% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin 12.0% -> 10.0%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-6.55%; #3983/6340 (top 62.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0953; #3412/5884 (top 58.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-15.1% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years4/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts20% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 2 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✓GreenblattRank #290✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗TempletonFAIL (1/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Valuation23% pass✓ 7✗ 21▾
10 of 13 flag INSE's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +7 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS6.9x✓Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value10.0%✓Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=10.0%, ROC=40.9%✓GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)2.3x✓Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per ShareN/A (negative BVPS)✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-0.3%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=14.1%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical Average✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value53.7% (IV=$9.50 vs Price=$4.40)✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share7.3x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low122% of trailing low ($3.60)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-6.55%; #3983/6340 (top 62.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization-0.1121; #5731/6449 (top 88.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+2.2118; #1004/5247 (top 19.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+14.05%; #453/4519 (top 10.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-31.46%; #4478/6202 (top 72.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.6% of shares last year, 3.2% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $400.0K
- Dividends
- —
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $116.0Mcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $241.6Mest. | $270.9Mest. | $240.7Mest. | $391.1Mest. | $346.8Mest. |
| Revenue | $256.6M↓16% | $61.4M↓29% | $60.8M↓24% | $57.2M↓5% | $304.1M↑2% | $297.1M↓8% | $322.9M↑13% | $284.5M↑38% | $205.8M |
| Operating Income | $40.7M↑36% | $10.3M↑6% | $9.9M↑25% | $9.2M↑475% | $30.5M↓1% | $30.7M↓21% | $38.9M↓16% | $46.5M↑1133% | -$4.5M |
| Net Income | -$7.6M↓114% | -$100.0K↑95% | $200.0K↑103% | -$500.0K↓400% | -$17.0M↓126% | $64.8M↑839% | $6.9M↓67% | $21.2M↑152% | -$40.6M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.00↑100% | $0.01↑104% | $-0.02 | $-0.58↓126% | $2.22↑754% | $0.26↓66% | $0.77↑148% | $-1.60 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.2%↓10% | 66.6%↓11% | 74.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9%↑62% | 16.8%↑49% | 16.3%↑66% | 16.1%↑507% | 10.0%↓3% | 10.3%↓14% | 12.0%↓26% | 16.3%↑847% | -2.2% |
| ROE | 58.5%↑110% | — | — | — | 104.9%↑105% | -1963.6%↓21500% | -9.1%↑64% | -25.6%↓167% | 38.1% |
| Total Debt | $325.4M↓7% | $325.4M↓7% | $323.8M↓9% | $330.5M↑3% | $349.5M↑12% | $311.0M↓1% | $314.7M↑13% | $278.6M↓10% | $309.9M |
| Shareholders' Equity | -$13.0M↓44% | -$13.0M↓44% | -$15.6M↓64% | -$12.4M↓464% | -$16.2M↓391% | -$3.3M↑96% | -$75.9M↑8% | -$82.8M↑22% | -$106.5M |
| Current Ratio | 2.16↑19% | 2.16↑19% | 2.27↑35% | 2.08↑45% | 2.23↑45% | 1.54↓1% | 1.55↓10% | 1.72↑14% | 1.52 |
| Debt / Equity | -25.03↑36% | -25.03↑36% | -20.76↑44% | -26.65↑82% | -21.57↑77% | -94.24↓2173% | -4.15↓23% | -3.36↓16% | -2.91 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $46.9M↓19% | $16.2M↑60% | $2.8M↓82% | $26.7M↑5% | $52.0M↑64% | $31.7M↓42% | $54.7M↑85% | $29.6M↑1133% | $2.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | $100.0K↓98% | $23.0M↑41% | $16.3M↑11% | $14.7M↓35% | $22.7M↑152% | $9.0M↑201% | -$8.9M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
INSE vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |