International Seaways, Inc.

INSW
About the company

International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of oceangoing vessels for the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international flag trade. The company operates in two segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. It operates fleet of 70 vessels of VLCCs, Suezmaxes, and Aframaxes, as well as MRs, LR1, and LR2 product carrier.

Country: United StatesPrice: $105.23Market Cap: $5.4B

Investment snapshot

41%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

6

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 6

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$75.56

-28.2% vs price

Models with upside

2 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

10 of 12 pass — Lynch and Asness object

Key risk

Split decision: 6 FAIL · 5 PASS · 4 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictPASSNEUTRALFAILBUY · Rank #182 (Top 5.9%)PASSPASSBUYFAILPASSFAILPASSFAILNEUTRALNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-39.0%N/AN/A-39.5%N/A+18.6%+77.1%-138.2%N/AN/AN/A-142.9%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage83% pass✓ 13✗ 2▾

    10 of 12 pass — Lynch and Asness object

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $665.4M vs NCA $761.7M
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.30, IC: 24.0x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.30
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-501.7M
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change24.21% -> 20.28%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities6.69
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.30
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.30
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=24.0x, D/EBITDA=0.6x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.30
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.2959; #1982/4210 (top 47.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency75% pass✓ 9✗ 2▾

    6 of 8 pass — Piotroski and Akre object

    Current Ratio6.69
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)11.7%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+1.7%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)39.4%
    ✓Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY2.87 -> 3.71
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.36x -> 0.32x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities6.69
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital27.8%
    ✓Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=19.9%; FY2024: ROIC=14.1%; FY2025: ROIC=10.5%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC11.3% (RR=41% x ROIC=27.8%)
    ✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)3/5 years above 12% (latest 10.5%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Verdicts54% pass✓ 7✗ 6▾

    Split decision: 6 FAIL · 5 PASS · 4 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✓GrahamPASS (4/9)•BuffettNEUTRAL (6/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✓GreenblattRank #182✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✓DremanPASS (6/11)✓MungerBUY (4/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✓AkrePASS (3/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Where It Falls Short

  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 16.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR-7.1%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 3706.2% vs Rev: 100.5%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency5/12 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-11.2%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR-7.1% CAGR over 3 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin 57.4% -> 41.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR14.9%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-7.1% over 3 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Valuation15% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾

    11 of 13 flag INSW's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +8 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS12.2x
    ✓Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio2.6x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B31.40
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 16.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value18.2%
    ✓Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=18.2%, ROC=39.4%
    ✓GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS16.9x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)13.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share2.6x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=16.9x, OE Yield=9.1%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=16.9x
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=16.9x, P/B=2.6x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value18.6% (IV=$129.30 vs Price=$105.23)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low317% of trailing low ($33.20)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+19.56%; #279/6340 (top 4.4%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.4395; #3100/6449 (top 48.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS16.9x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E-0.26
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share2.57x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.2868; #3380/5247 (top 64.4%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+42.47%; #766/6202 (top 12.4%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Profitability31% pass✓ 16✗ 19▾

    11 of 16 flag INSW's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)5/13 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)5/13 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)17.0%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)41.0% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$446.7M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 16.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR-7.1%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE44.5%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value18.2%
    ✓Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=18.2%, ROC=39.4%
    ✓GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets11.59%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY15.81% -> 11.59% (delta: -4.22%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=14.24%, ROA=11.59%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue36.6%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity44.5%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=16.9x, P/B=2.6x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity23.4% (3-yr avg)
    ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value18.6% (IV=$129.30 vs Price=$105.23)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency5/12 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue69.9%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity44.5%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR-7.1% CAGR over 3 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend57.4% (2023) -> 41.0% (2025)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin 57.4% -> 41.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+19.56%; #279/6340 (top 4.4%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+44.50%; #248/5226 (top 4.7%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0934; #3385/5884 (top 57.5%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-7.1% over 3 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years4/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Valuation models33% pass✓ 2✗ 4▾

    Models split on INSW at $105.23 — fair values range $43.33–$460.36

    Graham fair value$75.69
    ✗Graham-39.0% margin vs $105.23
    Greenblatt fair value$75.44
    ✗Greenblatt-39.5% margin vs $105.23
    Dreman fair value$129.30
    ✓Dreman+18.6% margin vs $105.23
    Munger fair value$460.36
    ✓Munger+77.1% margin vs $105.23
    Pabrai fair value$44.18
    ✗Pabrai-138.2% margin vs $105.23
    Templeton fair value$43.33
    ✗Templeton-142.9% margin vs $105.23
  • Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾

    6 of 10 flag INSW's cash flow — Dreman, Pabrai, Marks +3 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$446.7M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$427.6M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$380.1M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=14.24%, ROA=11.59%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)13.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=16.9x
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive3/6 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency9/12 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Transportation
SIC Sector: Water Transportation
Size: Mid Cap($5.4B)
Revenue: $843.3M-11.4% YoY
Net Income: $309.3M-25.8% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin41.0%
Return on Equity15.3%
Debt / Equity0.28
Current Ratio3.71
EPS (Diluted)$6.23−25.7% 1y
Shares Retired−0.5% / −1.0% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 0.5% of shares last year, 1.0% issued over two.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
$144.6M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY23
44.8% = 43.5% + 0.9%
FY24
−25.5% = −25.1% + −0.5%
FY25
−25.7% = −25.8% + 0.2%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, dividends paid.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-26
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-27
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-29
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-28
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-02
Market Cap$5.4Bcurrent------$2.9Best.$1.7Best.$2.1Best.$1.3Best.$478.7Mest.
Revenue$1.5B↑100%$483.2M↑146%$467.3M↑139%$325.5M↑77%$843.3M↓11%$951.6M↓11%$1.1B↑24%$864.7M↑217%$272.5M
Operating Income$1.1B↑328%$351.3M↑347%$301.3M↑334%$288.6M↑388%$345.4M↓24%$455.2M↓26%$615.4M↑39%$442.7M↑495%-$112.1M
Net Income$1.1B↑384%$344.2M↑388%$294.9M↑378%$286.1M↑477%$309.3M↓26%$416.7M↓25%$556.4M↑43%$387.9M↑391%-$133.5M
EPS (Diluted)--$6.90↑386%$5.91↑373%$5.75↑475%$6.23↓26%$8.38↓26%$11.25↑45%$7.77↑323%$-3.48
Gross Margin—————————
Operating Margin69.9%↑113%72.7%↑81%64.5%↑82%88.7%↑175%41.0%↓14%47.8%↓17%57.4%↑12%51.2%↑224%-41.1%
ROE44.5%↑296%———15.3%↓32%22.5%↓31%32.4%↑24%26.1%↑328%-11.4%
Total Debt$700.0M↓12%$700.0M↓12%$645.6M↑18%$602.1M↑1%$567.1M↓18%$688.4M↓5%$722.7M↓29%$1.0B↓7%$1.1B
Shareholders' Equity$2.4B↑22%$2.4B↑22%$2.3B↑19%$2.2B↑17%$2.0B↑9%$1.9B↑8%$1.7B↑15%$1.5B↑27%$1.2B
Current Ratio6.69↑282%6.69↑282%5.94↑527%7.34↑166%3.71↑29%2.87↑21%2.38↓5%2.50↑161%0.96
Debt / Equity0.30↓28%0.30↓28%0.29↓1%0.27↓14%0.28↓24%0.37↓12%0.42↓39%0.69↓27%0.94
Operating Cash Flow$797.8M↑143%$243.0M↑210%$267.7M↑212%$141.1M↑102%$380.1M↓31%$547.1M↓21%$688.4M↑139%$287.8M↑478%-$76.2M
Free Cash Flow----------$427.6M------

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Transportation

INSW vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$843.3MBottom 25%
Net Income$309.3MBottom 25%
ROE15.3%Bottom 25%
D/E0.28Top 25%
Op. Margin41.0%Top 25%
Curr. Ratio3.71Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
UNION PACIFIC CORPUNP$179.7B$302.44$24.5B$7.1B38.7%1.7240.2%0.912/94/94/70/3F-Score 73/11
CSX CORPCSX$95.9B$52.05$14.1B$2.9B22.0%1.4332.1%0.812/94/93/70/3F-Score 53/11
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTDRCL$86.5B$323.27$17.9B$4.3B42.5%2.1327.4%0.181/91/91/70/3F-Score 73/11
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COCNI$76.3B$127.18————————————
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPNSC$73.6B$327.88$12.2B$2.9B18.5%1.1035.8%0.853/96/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
MPLX LPMPLX$58.0B$57.25$13.0B$5.0B34.6%1.7945.7%1.232/94/94/71/3F-Score 68/11
Carnival Corp Ltd.CCL$39.3B$29.23$26.6B$2.8B22.5%2.1716.8%0.321/91/92/70/3F-Score 74/11
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.ODFL$36.0B$174.54$5.5B$1.0B23.7%0.0124.8%1.443/97/95/71/3F-Score 65/11