Ideal Power Inc.
IPWRAbout the company
Ideal Power Inc. focuses on the development and commercialization of its bidirectional bipolar junction TRANsistor solid-state switch technology. The company offers SymCool Power Module designed to meet low conduction loss needs of the solid-state circuit protection and EV contactor markets. It serves electric and hybrid electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging, renewable energy and energy storage system uninterruptible power supplies, industrial motor drives, solid-state transformers, power distribution and transmission switches, and other industrial and defense markets.
Investment snapshot
Positive
0
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 14
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
—
No comparable estimates
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio2.3x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-38.7%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-38.7%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share2.3x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-57.9%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-26.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=2.3x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($2.09)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-34.60%; #4882/6340 (top 77.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+1.2365; #1159/6449 (top 18.0%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share3.44x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.0009; #5026/5247 (top 95.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-27.41%; #3632/4519 (top 80.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-24.82%; #4199/6202 (top 67.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-10.3M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-9.4M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-9.1M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-90.93%, ROA=-105.29%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-26.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive0/14 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-52.8%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/14 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-9.4M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-27.41%; #3632/4519 (top 80.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -19.3% vs Rev: 57.2%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/14 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-2.2%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency1/2 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 19.2% -> -6.4%, operating margin -5205.4% -> -3081.8%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR-3.7%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts0% pass✗ 14▾
Split decision: 14 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (1/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability6% pass✓ 3✗ 32▾
15 of 16 flag IPWR's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/15 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/15 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-70.3%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-3081.8% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-10.3M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-28.0%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-38.7%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-38.7%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-105.29%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-52.54% -> -105.29% (delta: -52.75%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-90.93%, ROA=-105.29%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY-1.1% -> -6.4%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-28.0%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=2.3x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-97.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/14 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-40605.1%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-28.0%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-5205.4% (2023) -> -3081.8% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 19.2% -> -6.4%, operating margin -5205.4% -> -3081.8%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-34.60%; #4882/6340 (top 77.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+0.00%; #3480/3702 (top 94.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-27.98%; #3861/5226 (top 73.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.3101; #4626/5884 (top 78.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years0/7 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
11 of 12 flag IPWR's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities27.86✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag IPWR's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio27.86✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-508.7%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-518.7%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY29.06 -> 6.72✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.03x -> 0.04x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities27.86✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 2.4% of shares last year.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-06-30 2025-07-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $34.3Mcurrent | -- | -- | $43.0Mest. | $56.9Mest. | $43.5Mest. | $75.0Mest. | $55.5Mest. |
| Revenue | $30.3K↑57% | $5.8K↑355% | $0↓100% | $354.8K↓46% | $653.4K↑229% | $198.9K↓2% | $203.3K↓65% | $576.4K |
| Operating Income | -$12.3M↓6% | -$3.6M↓15% | -$3.7M↓31% | -$10.9M↑1% | -$11.1M↓7% | -$10.4M↓41% | -$7.3M↓51% | -$4.8M |
| Net Income | -$11.9M↓8% | -$3.4M↓12% | -$3.6M↓34% | -$10.6M↓2% | -$10.4M↓5% | -$10.0M↓38% | -$7.2M↓51% | -$4.8M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | $-1.17↓46% | $-0.80 |
| Gross Margin | 0.6%↑100% | 30.9%↑118% | — | -6.4%↓466% | -1.1%↓106% | 19.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Operating Margin | -40605.1%↑33% | -62468.1%↑75% | — | -3081.8%↓82% | -1694.5%↑67% | -5205.4%↓44% | -3612.4%↓329% | -841.3% |
| ROE | -28.0%↑68% | — | — | -134.3%↓130% | -58.3%↑41% | -98.9%↓146% | -40.1%↓103% | -19.8% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $42.5M↑233% | $42.5M↑233% | $17.8M↑15% | $7.9M↓56% | $17.9M↑77% | $10.1M↓44% | $17.9M↓26% | $24.1M |
| Current Ratio | 27.86↑121% | 27.86↑121% | 11.22↓45% | 6.72↓77% | 29.06↑197% | 9.79↓74% | 37.62↓13% | 43.19 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$9.2M | -$2.4M↓3% | -$2.0M↑2% | -$9.1M↓4% | -$8.7M↓23% | -$7.1M↓12% | -$6.4M↓49% | -$4.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$9.4M | -$2.4M↓2% | -$2.2M↓5% | -$9.3M↓4% | -$8.9M↓21% | -$7.4M↓12% | -$6.6M↓52% | -$4.3M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Electronic Equipment
IPWR vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPNVDA | $3.93T | $162.85 | $215.9B | $120.1B | 76.3% | 0.05 | 60.4% | 3.91 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 5/11 |
| INTEL CORPINTC | $317.1B | $59.66 | $52.9B | $267.0M | -0.2% | 0.41 | -4.2% | 2.02 | 3/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCTXN | $277.4B | $303.60 | $17.7B | $5.0B | 30.7% | 0.86 | 34.1% | 4.35 | 6/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |
| ANALOG DEVICES INCADI | $192.8B | $397.97 | $11.0B | $2.3B | 6.7% | 0.24 | 26.6% | 2.19 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 4/11 |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc.MSI | $87.8B | $531.20 | $11.7B | $2.2B | 89.4% | 3.49 | 25.6% | 1.04 | 2/9 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/LHX | $50.7B | $272.35 | — | $1.6B | 8.2% | 0.57 | — | 1.19 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 3/11 |
| NOKIA CORPNOK | $45.7B | $8.07 | $23.4B | $764.7M | 3.1% | 0.16 | 4.4% | 1.58 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE COERIC | $34.2B | $10.56 | $25.7B | $3.1B | 26.0% | 0.30 | 16.3% | 1.29 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 5/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |