KOHLS Corp
KSSAbout the company
Kohl's Corporation operates as an omnichannel retailer in the United States. It offers apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty products, and home products through its stores and website. The company provides its products primarily under the brand names of Apt. 9, Croft & Barrow, FLX, Jumping Beans, SO, Sonoma Goods for Life, and Tek Gear, as well as LC Lauren Conrad, Nine West, and Simply Vera Vera Wang. Kohl's Corporation was founded in 1988 and is headquartered in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.
Investment snapshot
Positive
6
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
4 / 6
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$43.00
+79.2% vs price
Models with upside
9 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
9 of 10 pass — Buffett objects
Key risk
7 of 8 flag KSS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #818 (Top 26.4%) | NEUTRAL | PASS | BUY | NEUTRAL | FAIL | BUY | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | BUY | FAIL | BUY | FAIL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
| Margin of Safety | +45.4% | +62.0% | N/A | +39.2% | N/A | +16.4% | +76.3% | +3.6% | +77.7% | +42.9% | +69.3% | -153.7% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 · TTM ended 2026-08-01 vs 2025-08-02 · TTM ended 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-08-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Cash Flow90% pass✓ 11✗ 1▾
9 of 10 pass — Buffett objects
Free Cash Flow Proxy$600.0M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$1.0B✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$1.4B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=10.33%, ROA=2.04%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)1.9x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=10.1x, FCF Yield=37.0%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive20/21 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap38.4%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share2.7x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency25/25 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$1.0B✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+38.00%; #140/4519 (top 3.1%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models90% pass✓ 9✗ 1▾
Models split on KSS at $24.00 — fair values range $9.46–$107.47
Graham fair value$43.95✓Graham+45.4% margin vs $24.00Buffett fair value$63.19✓Buffett+62.0% margin vs $24.00Greenblatt fair value$39.45✓Greenblatt+39.2% margin vs $24.00Dreman fair value$28.70✓Dreman+16.4% margin vs $24.00Munger fair value$101.10✓Munger+76.3% margin vs $24.00Pabrai fair value$24.90✓Pabrai+3.6% margin vs $24.00Akre fair value$107.47✓Akre+77.7% margin vs $24.00Marks fair value$42.05✓Marks+42.9% margin vs $24.00Ackman fair value$78.14✓Ackman+69.3% margin vs $24.00Templeton fair value$9.46✗Templeton-153.7% margin vs $24.00 - Valuation62% pass✓ 23✗ 5▾
8 of 13 pass — Lynch, Greenblatt, Templeton +2 more object
Net income / market capitalization+9.92%; #664/6340 (top 10.5%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / 3-yr avg EPS11.6x✓Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio0.7x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B7.70✓Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 10.1x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value17.9%✓Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=17.9%, ROC=8.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS10.1x✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)1.9x✓Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share0.7x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=10.1x, OE Yield=22.3%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=10.1x, FCF Yield=37.0%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=10.1x, P/B=0.7x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value22.7% (IV=$31.05 vs Price=$24.00)✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share2.7x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low358% of trailing low ($6.70)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.5318; #888/6449 (top 13.8%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS10.1x✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E-1.94✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.66x✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+9.7%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+5.6706; #491/5247 (top 9.4%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+38.00%; #140/4519 (top 3.1%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+80.72%; #424/6202 (top 6.8%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Growth13% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
7 of 8 flag KSS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 10.1x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-21.7%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -2.7% vs Rev: -2.9%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency25/27 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-4.3%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR-21.7% CAGR over 4 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 39.9% -> 40.6%, operating margin 4.1% -> 4.0%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR-0.5%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-21.7% over 4 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency13% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
7 of 8 flag KSS's efficiency — Graham, Greenblatt, Piotroski +4 more
Current Ratio1.49✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)11.4%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+1.4%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)8.2%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.08 -> 1.46✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.20x -> 1.16x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.49✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital8.4%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=10.1%; FY2024: ROIC=6.4%; FY2025: ROIC=9.0%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC6.6% (RR=79% x ROIC=8.4%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)1/5 years above 12% (latest 9.0%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Profitability25% pass✓ 12✗ 23▾
12 of 16 flag KSS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more
Net income / market capitalization+9.92%; #664/6340 (top 10.5%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive EPS (10 years)17/27 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)25/27 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)7.5%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)4.0% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$600.0M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 10.1x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-21.7%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE6.5%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value17.9%✓Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=17.9%, ROC=8.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets2.04%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY0.80% -> 2.04% (delta: +1.23%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=10.33%, ROA=2.04%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY40.4% -> 40.6%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue2.2%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity6.5%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=10.1x, P/B=0.7x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity5.9% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value22.7% (IV=$31.05 vs Price=$24.00)✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency25/27 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue3.8%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity6.5%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR-21.7% CAGR over 4 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend4.1% (2023) -> 4.0% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 39.9% -> 40.6%, operating margin 4.1% -> 4.0%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingGross profit / total assets+47.14%; #735/3702 (top 19.9%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+6.48%; #2287/5226 (top 43.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0218; #1540/5884 (top 26.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-21.7% over 4 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years8/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage25% pass✓ 5✗ 10▾
9 of 12 flag KSS's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +6 more
Debt Levels0.34✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $1.3B vs NCA $1.3B✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.35, IC: 2.1x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.34✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-504.0M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change8.66% -> 10.75%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.49✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.34✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xInterest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=2.1x, D/EBITDA=1.1x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.34✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.3376; #2109/4210 (top 50.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Verdicts46% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾
Split decision: 6 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 4 BUY · 2 PASS
Overall verdict✓GrahamPASS (5/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #818•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓MungerBUY (3/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✓MarksBUY (4/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #212/2370 (Top 8.9%))✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✓SchlossBUY (6/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #138/963 (Top 14.3%))
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.9% of shares last year, 1.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- $56.0M
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-08-01 2025-08-03 – 2026-08-01 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid, revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, depreciation amortization. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-05-03 – 2026-08-01 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-02-01 – 2026-05-02 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7Bcurrent | -- | -- | $1.9Best. | $1.4Best. | $2.5Best. | $2.8Best. | $5.8Best. |
| Revenue | $15.4B↓3% | $3.5B↓1% | $3.2B↓2% | $15.5B↓4% | $16.2B↓7% | $17.5B↓3% | $18.1B↓7% | $19.4B |
| Operating Income | $592.0M↑5% | $261.0M↓6% | $46.0M↓23% | $624.0M↑44% | $433.0M↓40% | $717.0M↑191% | $246.0M↓85% | $1.7B |
| Net Income | $270.0M↑30% | $151.0M↓1% | -$14.0M↑7% | $272.0M↑150% | $109.0M↓66% | $317.0M↑1768% | -$19.0M↓102% | $938.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $1.28↓5% | $-0.13 | $2.38↑143% | $0.98↓66% | $2.85↑2000% | $-0.15↓102% | $6.32 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 40.6% | 40.4%↑1% | 39.9%↑9% | 36.7%↓11% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8%↑8% | 7.4%↓6% | 1.5%↓22% | 4.0%↑51% | 2.7%↓35% | 4.1%↑202% | 1.4%↓84% | 8.6% |
| ROE | 6.5%↑22% | — | — | 6.7%↑134% | 2.9%↓65% | 8.1%↑1713% | -0.5%↓103% | 20.1% |
| Total Debt | $1.4B↓7% | $1.4B↓7% | $1.4B↓9% | $1.4B↓6% | $1.5B↓12% | $1.7B↓10% | $1.9B↓4% | $2.0B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $4.2B↑6% | $4.2B↑6% | $4.0B↑6% | $4.0B↑6% | $3.8B↓2% | $3.9B↑3% | $3.8B↓19% | $4.7B |
| Current Ratio | 1.49↑9% | 1.49↑9% | 1.48↑36% | 1.46↑35% | 1.08↓17% | 1.31↑9% | 1.20↓22% | 1.53 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.34↓13% | 0.34↓13% | 0.34↓15% | 0.35↓12% | 0.40↓10% | 0.44↓13% | 0.51↑19% | 0.43 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.4B↑49% | $552.0M↓8% | -$74.0M↑20% | $1.4B↑113% | $648.0M↓45% | $1.2B↑314% | $282.0M↓88% | $2.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.0B↑115% | $490.0M↓4% | -$158.0M↑22% | $1.0B↑454% | $182.0M↓69% | $591.0M↑209% | -$544.0M↓133% | $1.7B |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Retail
KSS vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEWCOST | $490.2B | $1106.21 | $275.2B | $8.1B | 27.8% | 0.20 | 3.8% | 1.03 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 6/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| HOME DEPOT, INC.HD | $347.9B | $348.69 | $164.7B | $14.2B | 110.5% | 4.00 | 12.7% | 1.06 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/TJX | $148.4B | $134.37 | $60.4B | $5.5B | 53.9% | 0.28 | — | 1.14 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 7/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 4/11 |
| FASTENAL COFAST | $63.3B | $55.19 | $8.2B | $1.3B | 31.9% | 0.03 | 20.2% | 4.85 | 4/9 | 7/9 | 5/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| AUTOZONE INCAZO | $52.5B | $3259.70 | $18.9B | $2.5B | -73.2% | -2.61 | 19.1% | 0.88 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| KROGER COKR | $41.8B | $70.80 | $147.6B | $1.0B | 17.1% | 2.68 | 1.3% | 0.80 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 3/11 |
| WILLIAMS SONOMA INCWSM | $29.9B | $254.05 | $7.8B | $1.1B | 52.3% | — | 18.1% | 1.39 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| CASEYS GENERAL STORES INCCASY | $26.3B | $712.08 | $17.6B | $714.4M | 18.1% | 0.62 | — | 1.01 | 3/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 9 | 3/11 |