CS Disco, Inc.

LAW
About the company

CS Disco, Inc. provides cloud-native and artificial intelligence-powered legal products for legal hold, legal request, ediscovery, legal document review, and case management in the United States and internationally.

Country: United StatesPrice: $6.58Market Cap: $432.2M

Investment snapshot

12%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

2

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

1 / 13

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

—

No comparable estimates

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2363 (Top 76.3%)PASSFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILPASSFAILFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-25

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-25

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-25

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-25

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-25

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-25

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾

    8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: N/A
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities3.54
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0007; #344/4210 (top 8.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾

    No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio3.3x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-11.7%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-11.7%, ROC=-47.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share3.3x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-10.5%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-4.2%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=3.3x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low202% of trailing low ($3.25)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-7.36%; #4048/6340 (top 63.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.2775; #3798/6449 (top 58.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share3.42x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.3969; #2931/5247 (top 55.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-4.57%; #2949/4519 (top 65.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+96.42%; #347/6202 (top 5.6%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾

    No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-43.8M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-19.8M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-14.9M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-8.60%, ROA=-25.55%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-4.2%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive0/6 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-4.7%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/6 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-19.8M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-4.57%; #2949/4519 (top 65.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Profitability6% pass✓ 6✗ 29▾

    15 of 16 flag LAW's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)0/7 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/7 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-26.8%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-30.7% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-43.8M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-26.5%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-11.7%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-11.7%, ROC=-47.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-25.55%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-30.93% -> -25.55% (delta: +5.38%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-8.60%, ROA=-25.55%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY74.2% -> 74.9%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-18.1%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-26.5%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/B=3.3x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-31.2% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency0/6 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-19.9%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-26.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-36.1% (2023) -> -30.7% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 74.7% -> 74.9%, operating margin -36.1% -> -30.7%
    ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-7.36%; #4048/6340 (top 63.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+78.56%; #259/3702 (top 7.0%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-26.51%; #3838/5226 (top 73.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0801; #3197/5884 (top 54.3%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years0/6 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Growth13% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾

    7 of 8 flag LAW's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$-1.74 (2020) -> $-0.72 (2025)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency0/6 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth4.9%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 74.7% -> 74.9%, operating margin -36.1% -> -30.7%
    ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR18.0%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Verdicts13% pass✓ 2✗ 14▾

    Split decision: 13 FAIL · 2 PASS · 1 NEUTRAL

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #2363✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1589/2370 (Top 67.0%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    6 of 8 flag LAW's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

    Current Ratio3.54
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-119.8%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-129.8%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-47.9%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY6.11 -> 3.78
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.80x -> 0.90x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities3.54
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital-22.5%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-19.6%; FY2024: ROIC=-33.0%; FY2025: ROIC=-29.6%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -29.6%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Business Services
Size: Small Cap($432.2M)
Revenue: $156.8M+8.3% YoY
Net Income: $44.4M+20.4% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-30.7%
Return on Equity-34.6%
Debt / Equity0.00
Current Ratio3.78
EPS (Diluted)$-0.72
Buybacks (1y)$105.0K
Buybacks (2y)$232.0K
Shares Retired−4.9% / −3.7% 2y

Similar Companies

ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
$122.3B
EAELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
$52.9B
RBRKRubrik, Inc.
$22.6B
ACMAECOM
$9.1B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 4.9% of shares last year, 3.7% issued over two.

Buybacks
$105.0K
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-25
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-20
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-22
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-24
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-02-25
Market Cap$432.2Mcurrent------$395.8Mest.$304.3Mest.$499.5Mest.$494.0Mest.$2.0Best.
Revenue$171.5M↑12%$45.3M↑11%$43.1M↑13%$41.9M↑14%$156.8M↑8%$144.8M↑5%$138.1M↑2%$135.2M↑18%$114.3M
Operating Income-$34.2M↑47%-$5.6M↑61%-$9.2M↑22%-$10.1M↑20%-$48.1M↑22%-$61.7M↓24%-$49.8M↑31%-$71.8M↓201%-$23.8M
Net Income-$31.8M↑48%-$5.0M↑63%-$8.7M↑20%-$9.6M↑16%-$44.4M↑20%-$55.8M↓32%-$42.1M↑40%-$70.8M↓191%-$24.3M
EPS (Diluted)--$-0.08↑64%$-0.13↑28%$-0.15↑21%$-0.72↑23%$-0.93↓33%$-0.70↑42%$-1.20↓64%$-0.73
Gross Margin74.8%75.5%74.4%74.2%74.9%↑1%74.2%↓1%74.7%74.7%↑3%72.8%
Operating Margin-19.9%↑53%-12.4%↑65%-21.4%↑31%-24.1%↑30%-30.7%↑28%-42.6%↓18%-36.1%↑32%-53.1%↓155%-20.8%
ROE-26.5%↑43%———-34.6%↑8%-37.8%↓80%-21.0%↑34%-31.6%↓249%-9.1%
Total Debt$84.0K↓33%$84.0K↓33%$94.0K↓31%$105.0K↓29%$116.0K↓27%$158.0K↓21%$199.0K↓16%$238.0K↑140%$99.0K
Shareholders' Equity$120.0M↓8%$120.0M↓8%$120.2M↓13%$123.9M↓13%$128.1M↓13%$147.5M↓26%$200.3M↓10%$223.6M↓17%$268.7M
Current Ratio3.54↓10%3.54↓10%3.77↓44%4.19↓44%3.78↓38%6.11↓27%8.32↓18%10.17↓32%15.06
Debt / Equity0.00↓27%0.00↓27%0.00↓21%0.00↓19%0.00↓15%0.00↑8%0.00↓7%0.00↑189%0.00
Operating Cash Flow-$15.0M↓10%-$3.0M↓211%-$1.1M↑75%-$11.7M↓11%-$14.9M↓71%-$8.7M↑66%-$25.5M↑45%-$46.0M↓113%-$21.6M
Free Cash Flow-$19.8M↓18%-$5.4M↓165%-$2.2M↑57%-$12.4M↓12%-$18.0M↓56%-$11.5M↑62%-$30.4M↑40%-$50.4M↓104%-$24.7M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Business Services

LAW vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$156.8MBottom 25%
Net Income$44.4MMedian
ROE-34.6%Bottom 25%
D/E0.00Top 25%
Op. Margin-30.7%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio3.78Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP$122.3B$309.93$21.9B$4.4B73.2%0.8224.2%1.054/95/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA$52.9B$209.70$7.5B$887.0M13.1%0.2215.4%1.051/94/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
Rubrik, Inc.RBRK$22.6B$109.88$1.3B$348.8M67.1%—-26.2%1.691/90/92/70/3F-Score 62/11
AECOMACM$9.1B$70.50$16.1B$561.8M22.5%1.096.4%1.141/93/93/71/3F-Score 82/11
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT$6.2B$152.07$1.2B$70.7M942.8%—6.3%1.951/92/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
WPP plcWPP$6.0B$27.79$18.2B$289.5M-8.5%1.942.8%0.891/92/91/70/3F-Score 32/11
VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS$5.6B$48.94$623.5M$129.3M-21.6%0.76-23.5%1.971/90/91/70/3F-Score 51/11
ROBERT HALF INC.RHI$4.3B$42.00$5.4B$133.0M10.4%—1.4%1.532/95/91/70/3F-Score 52/11