Pulmonx Corp

LUNG
About the company

Pulmonx Corporation, a commercial-stage medical technology company that provides a minimally invasive treatment for patients with severe emphysema, a form of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It offers Zephyr Endobronchial Valve; and Chartis Pulmonary Assessment System, a balloon catheter and console system with flow and pressure sensors that are used to assess the presence of collateral ventilation.

Country: United StatesPrice: $2.86Market Cap: $124.6M

Investment snapshot

6%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

1 / 14

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

—

No comparable estimates

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2858 (Top 92.3%)FAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILPASSFAILFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-10

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-10

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-10

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-10

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-03

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾

      No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

      Price / 3-yr avg EPS
      ✗Graham<= 15x
      Price-to-Book Ratio2.2x
      ✗Graham<= 1.5x
      P/E x P/B
      ✗Graham<= 22.5
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise Value-35.9%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-35.9%, ROC=-315.4%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / EPS
      ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Price / Book Value per Share2.2x
      ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Valuation Reasonableness
      ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-26.4%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=2.2x
      ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Price vs. Trailing Low223% of trailing low ($1.28)
      ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Net income / market capitalization-34.16%; #4877/6340 (top 76.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.2746; #3810/6449 (top 59.1%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
      ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share2.33x
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change-94.2%
      ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization+0.7127; #2179/5247 (top 41.5%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-20.56%; #3526/4519 (top 78.0%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+123.44%; #258/6202 (top 4.2%)
      ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾

      No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion

      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-56.3M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      FCF Positive and Growing$-25.6M
      ✗LynchPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$-32.4M
      ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-25.04%, ROA=-41.77%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-26.4%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      FCF Positive0/8 years FCF positive
      ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
      (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-21.2%
      ✗Ackman>= 4%
      Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/8 years positive
      ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-25.6M
      ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-20.56%; #3526/4519 (top 78.0%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Profitability6% pass✓ 5✗ 30▾

      15 of 16 flag LUNG's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

      Positive EPS (10 years)0/9 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/9 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-56.1%
      ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-59.3% (latest)
      ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-56.3M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)
      ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE-124.4%
      ✗Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise Value-35.9%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-35.9%, ROC=-315.4%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets-41.77%
      ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY-34.63% -> -41.77% (delta: -7.14%)
      ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-25.04%, ROA=-41.77%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY74.0% -> 74.2%
      ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-47.2%
      ✗Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-124.4%
      ✗Dreman> 12%
      Margin of SafetyP/B=2.2x
      ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
      Return on Equity-72.3% (3-yr avg)
      ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency0/8 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue-44.4%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity-124.4%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend-90.2% (2023) -> -59.3% (2025)
      ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 73.9% -> 74.2%, operating margin -90.2% -> -59.3%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Net income / market capitalization-34.16%; #4877/6340 (top 76.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Gross profit / total assets+62.36%; #437/3702 (top 11.8%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity-124.42%; #4690/5226 (top 89.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0689; #2993/5884 (top 50.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years0/8 years positive
      ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Verdicts6% pass✓ 1✗ 15▾

      Split decision: 14 FAIL · 1 PASS · 1 NEUTRAL

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #2858✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (1/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1810/2370 (Top 76.4%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
    • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 4✗ 11▾

      11 of 12 flag LUNG's debt & leverage — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +8 more

      LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $37.7M vs NCA $63.3M
      ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.11, IC: -9.4x
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity1.11
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt$15.0M
      ✓LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change20.88% -> 28.61%
      ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.05
      ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.11
      ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      Debt Levels1.11
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-17.2x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)
      ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1.11
      ✗Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.1056; #3330/4210 (top 79.1%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    • Growth25% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾

      6 of 8 flag LUNG's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -5.0% vs Rev: -3.2%
      ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction$-11.03 (2018) -> $-1.33 (2025)
      ✗DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR
      ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency0/8 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth22.0%
      ✓Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
      ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 73.9% -> 74.2%, operating margin -90.2% -> -59.3%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR22.6%
      ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

      6 of 8 flag LUNG's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

      Current Ratio4.05
      ✓Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-100.4%
      ✗Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC-110.4%
      ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-315.4%
      ✗Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY5.58 -> 5.07
      ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.51x -> 0.70x
      ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.05
      ✓Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital-43.2%
      ✗Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-31.5%; FY2024: ROIC=-37.1%; FY2025: ROIC=-46.5%
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
      ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -46.5%)
      ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Medical Equipment
    SIC Sector: Measuring & Medical Instruments
    Size: Micro Cap($124.6M)
    Revenue: $90.5M+8.0% YoY
    Net Income: $54.0M+4.2% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin-59.3%
    Return on Equity-99.8%
    Debt / Equity0.69
    Current Ratio5.07
    EPS (Diluted)$-1.33
    Shares Retired−6.1% / −9.6% 2y

    Shareholder Return

    Fiscal 2025

    Issued 6.1% of shares last year, 9.6% issued over two.

    Buybacks
    —
    Dividends
    —

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

    MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

    2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, capex.

    Q3 FY 2026

    2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex.

    Q2 FY 2026

    2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex.

    Q1 FY 2026

    2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

    Sources
    FY 2025
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2026-03-10
    FY 2024
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2025-02-25
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2024-02-27
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-03-01
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2022-03-01
    Market Cap$124.6Mcurrent------$69.3Mest.$226.0Mest.$511.8Mest.$334.7Mest.$901.4Mest.
    Revenue$88.8M↓3%$22.8M↑6%$22.8M↓5%$20.6M↓9%$90.5M↑8%$83.8M↑22%$68.7M↑28%$53.7M↑11%$48.4M
    Operating Income-$39.4M↑31%-$7.5M↑48%-$9.1M↑39%-$13.0M↑11%-$53.7M↑7%-$57.7M↑7%-$61.9M↓6%-$58.6M↓24%-$47.3M
    Net Income-$42.6M↑25%-$8.4M↑40%-$10.1M↑34%-$13.7M↑5%-$54.0M↑4%-$56.4M↑7%-$60.8M↓3%-$58.9M↓21%-$48.7M
    EPS (Diluted)--$-0.19↑44%$-0.24↑37%$-0.33↑8%$-1.33↑8%$-1.44↑10%$-1.60↓1%$-1.59↓18%$-1.35
    Gross Margin77.4%↑6%76.2%↑2%78.0%↑8%77.9%↑7%74.2%74.0%73.9%↓1%74.3%↑1%73.6%
    Operating Margin-44.4%↑29%-32.8%↑51%-39.8%↑36%-62.9%↑3%-59.3%↑14%-68.9%↑24%-90.2%↑17%-109.3%↓12%-97.7%
    ROE-124.4%↓32%———-99.8%↓52%-65.7%↓28%-51.4%↓34%-38.3%↓52%-25.2%
    Total Debt$37.8M↑2%$37.8M↑2%$37.5M↑1%$37.3M$37.1M$37.2M$37.2M↑115%$17.3M↑3073%$546.0K
    Shareholders' Equity$34.2M↓43%$34.2M↓43%$39.2M↓43%$45.8M↓41%$54.1M↓37%$85.8M↓27%$118.3M↓23%$154.0M↓20%$193.2M
    Current Ratio4.05↓17%4.05↓17%4.32↓19%4.91↓1%5.07↓9%5.58↓14%6.50↓29%9.14↓23%11.85
    Debt / Equity1.11↑79%1.11↑79%0.96↑78%0.82↑70%0.69↑58%0.43↑38%0.31↑180%0.11↑3881%0.00
    Operating Cash Flow-$25.6M↑20%-$3.2M↑61%-$5.2M↓33%-$10.1M↑24%-$32.4M↓3%-$31.5M↑16%-$37.6M↑17%-$45.1M↓9%-$41.4M
    Free Cash Flow-$25.6M↑21%-$3.2M↑61%-$5.2M↓32%-$10.1M↑25%-$32.8M-$33.0M↑14%-$38.4M↑17%-$46.4M↓3%-$45.1M

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Medical Equipment

    LUNG vs Peers — Financial Grading

    Revenue$90.5MBottom 25%
    Net Income$54.0MBottom 25%
    ROE-99.8%Bottom 25%
    D/E0.69Bottom 25%
    Op. Margin-59.3%Bottom 25%
    Curr. Ratio5.07Top 25%
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    ALCON INCALC$35.6B$74.12$10.4B$980.0M4.4%0.2113.1%2.122/91/93/70/3F-Score 64/11
    KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NVPHG$29.7B$30.34$21.0B$1.1B8.2%0.648.0%1.321/91/91/70/3F-Score 53/11
    WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INCWST$29.0B$416.42$3.1B$493.7M15.5%0.0619.0%3.024/96/96/71/3F-Score 75/11
    SMITH & NEPHEW PLCSNN$13.1B$31.28$6.2B$625.0M11.8%0.5912.9%2.572/90/91/70/3F-Score 64/11
    MSA Safety IncMSA$6.7B$174.17$1.9B$278.9M20.4%0.4219.8%3.015/95/94/71/3F-Score 57/11
    STAAR SURGICAL COSTAA$1.3B$26.39$239.4M$80.4M-23.4%—-38.3%4.552/92/92/70/3F-Score 33/11
    ARTIVION, INC.AORT$931.9M$19.10$441.3M$9.8M2.2%0.487.6%3.532/90/90/70/3F-Score 71/11
    InMode Ltd.INMD$763.6M$13.27$370.5M$93.8M13.7%—23.0%9.885/93/90/73/3F-Score 44/11