Mistras Group, Inc.

MG
About the company

Mistras Group, Inc. provides technology-enabled industrial asset integrity and laboratory testing solutions in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and South America. The company offers non-destructive testing (NDT) services; pipeline inspections; Plant Condition Management Software; maintenance planning; and specialized engineering solutions.

Country: United StatesPrice: $20.20Market Cap: $643.7M

Investment snapshot

18%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

3

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

2 / 11

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$6.30

-68.8% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

MG overvalued: all 10 models price fair value below $20.20 (median $6.30)

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #1047 (Top 33.8%)NEUTRALFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILPASSPASSFAILBUYFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-114.4%-233.3%-52.5%-208.9%N/A-634.5%-589.4%-182.1%-173.7%N/A-435.8%-656.6%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-11

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-11

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-11

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-02

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Valuation models0% pass✗ 10▾

      MG overvalued: all 10 models price fair value below $20.20 (median $6.30)

      Graham fair value$9.42
      ✗Graham-114.4% margin vs $20.20
      Buffett fair value$6.06
      ✗Buffett-233.3% margin vs $20.20
      Lynch fair value$13.25
      ✗Lynch-52.5% margin vs $20.20
      Greenblatt fair value$6.54
      ✗Greenblatt-208.9% margin vs $20.20
      Dreman fair value$2.75
      ✗Dreman-634.5% margin vs $20.20
      Munger fair value$2.93
      ✗Munger-589.4% margin vs $20.20
      Pabrai fair value$7.16
      ✗Pabrai-182.1% margin vs $20.20
      Akre fair value$7.38
      ✗Akre-173.7% margin vs $20.20
      Ackman fair value$3.77
      ✗Ackman-435.8% margin vs $20.20
      Templeton fair value$2.67
      ✗Templeton-656.6% margin vs $20.20
    • Profitability6% pass✓ 9✗ 26▾

      15 of 16 flag MG's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

      Positive EPS (10 years)8/18 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)14/18 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)2.5%
      ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)5.6% (latest)
      ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy$23.2M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)
      ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.91
      ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR42.1%
      ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE8.4%
      ✗Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise Value5.7%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.7%, ROC=23.1%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets2.91%
      ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY3.62% -> 2.91% (delta: -0.72%)
      ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.70%, ROA=2.91%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY26.3% -> 28.2%
      ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue3.9%
      ✗Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity8.4%
      ✗Dreman> 12%
      Margin of SafetyP/E=38.1x, P/B=2.7x
      ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
      Return on Equity2.5% (3-yr avg)
      ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic Value-634.5% (IV=$2.75 vs Price=$20.20)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency14/17 years positive
      ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue6.1%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity8.4%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR42.1% CAGR over 4 years
      ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend-0.3% (2023) -> 5.6% (2025)
      ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 26.1% -> 28.2%, operating margin -0.3% -> 5.6%
      ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Net income / market capitalization+3.23%; #2294/6340 (top 36.2%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Gross profit / total assets+35.93%; #1129/3702 (top 30.5%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity+8.39%; #2049/5226 (top 39.2%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0240; #1652/5884 (top 28.1%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR42.1% over 4 years
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years6/9 years positive
      ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Valuation8% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾

      12 of 13 flag MG's valuation — Graham, Greenblatt, Dreman +9 more

      Price / 3-yr avg EPS110.2x
      ✗Graham<= 15x
      Price-to-Book Ratio2.7x
      ✗Graham<= 1.5x
      P/E x P/B299.10
      ✗Graham<= 22.5
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.91
      ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise Value5.7%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.7%, ROC=23.1%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / EPS38.1x
      ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price / (CFO / Shares)19.4x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Price / Book Value per Share2.7x
      ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=38.1x, OE Yield=3.6%
      ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/E or FCF YieldP/E=38.1x, FCF Yield=1.3%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=38.1x, P/B=2.7x
      ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic Value-634.5% (IV=$2.75 vs Price=$20.20)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / FCF per Share76.8x
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Price vs. Trailing Low268% of trailing low ($7.55)
      ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Net income / market capitalization+3.23%; #2294/6340 (top 36.2%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.3856; #3337/6449 (top 51.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS38.1x
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
      ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share53.78x
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change+10.4%
      ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization+1.1624; #1608/5247 (top 30.6%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.23%; #1543/4519 (top 34.1%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+20.96%; #1296/6202 (top 20.9%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾

      7 of 8 flag MG's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +4 more

      Current Ratio1.74
      ✗Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)5.0%
      ✗Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC-5.0%
      ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)23.1%
      ✗Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY1.50 -> 1.74
      ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.40x -> 1.25x
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.74
      ✓Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital8.5%
      ✗Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-0.4%; FY2024: ROIC=8.5%; FY2025: ROIC=7.8%
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROIC7.8% (RR=100% x ROIC=7.8%)
      ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 7.8%)
      ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
    • Verdicts20% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

      Split decision: 11 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS · 1 BUY

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✗GreenblattRank #1047•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #305/2370 (Top 12.9%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
    • Growth25% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾

      6 of 8 flag MG's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.91
      ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR42.1%
      ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 13.9% vs Rev: 4.6%
      ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction$0.54 (2014) -> $0.53 (2025)
      ✗DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR-0.2% CAGR over 11 years
      ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency14/17 years positive
      ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth2.6%
      ✗Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
      ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR42.1% CAGR over 4 years
      ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 26.1% -> 28.2%, operating margin -0.3% -> 5.6%
      ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR4.1%
      ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR42.1% over 4 years
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Debt & Leverage50% pass✓ 8✗ 7▾

      6 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +3 more object

      LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $161.0M vs NCA $96.4M
      ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.70, IC: 3.2x
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity0.70
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt$-142.0M
      ✗LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change30.22% -> 28.53%
      ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.74
      ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.70
      ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      Debt Levels0.70
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=3.2x, D/EBITDA=2.2x
      ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.70
      ✓Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.7000; #2840/4210 (top 67.5%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    • Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

      5 of 10 pass — Buffett, Dreman, Pabrai +2 more object

      Free Cash Flow Proxy$23.2M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      FCF Positive and Growing$33.7M
      ✓LynchPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$33.0M
      ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.70%, ROA=2.91%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)19.4x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      P/E or FCF YieldP/E=38.1x, FCF Yield=1.3%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      FCF Positive16/16 years FCF positive
      ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
      (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap5.3%
      ✓Ackman>= 4%
      Price / FCF per Share76.8x
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency16/16 years positive
      ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$33.7M
      ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.23%; #1543/4519 (top 34.1%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Business Services
    SIC Sector: Engineering & Management Services
    Size: Small Cap($643.7M)
    Revenue: $724.0M-0.8% YoY
    Net Income: $16.8M-11.2% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin5.6%
    Return on Equity7.2%
    Debt / Equity0.76
    Current Ratio1.74
    EPS (Diluted)$0.53−11.7% 1y
    Shares Retired−1.8% / −3.1% 2y

    Shareholder Return

    Fiscal 2025

    Issued 1.8% of shares last year, 3.1% issued over two.

    Buybacks
    —
    Dividends
    —

    What drove EPS

    A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

    FY22
    61.5% = 68.4% + −4.1%
    FY25
    −11.7% = −11.2% + −0.5%
    Earnings Fewer shares More shares

    The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

    Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

    MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

    2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

    Q3 FY 2026

    2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

    Q2 FY 2026

    2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

    Q1 FY 2026

    2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

    Sources
    FY 2025
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2026-03-11
    FY 2024
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2025-03-11
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2024-03-11
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-03-15
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2022-03-14
    Market Cap$643.7Mcurrent------$446.8Mest.$307.8Mest.$238.0Mest.$158.6Mest.$198.5Mest.
    Revenue$748.2M↑5%$204.6M↑5%$193.1M↑4%$169.0M↑5%$724.0M↓1%$729.6M↑3%$705.5M↑3%$687.4M↑2%$677.1M
    Operating Income$45.5M↑19%$15.0M↓26%$12.9M↑54%$4.7M↑563%$40.6M↑2%$39.8M↑2192%-$1.9M↓110%$19.8M↑9%$18.2M
    Net Income$20.8M↑15%$6.9M↓47%$7.6M↑151%$2.4M↑175%$16.8M↓11%$19.0M↑209%-$17.5M↓369%$6.5M↑68%$3.9M
    EPS (Diluted)--$0.21↓49%$0.23↑130%$0.07↑170%$0.53↓12%$0.60↑203%$-0.58↓376%$0.21↑62%$0.13
    Gross Margin28.7%30.3%↑2%29.2%26.5%↑5%28.2%↑7%26.3%↑1%26.1%↓9%28.8%↓1%29.1%
    Operating Margin6.1%↑14%7.4%↓29%6.7%↑47%2.8%↑542%5.6%↑3%5.5%↑2122%-0.3%↓109%2.9%↑7%2.7%
    ROE8.4%↑5%———7.2%↓25%9.5%↑204%-9.2%↓380%3.3%↑70%1.9%
    Total Debt$173.8M↓14%$173.8M↓14%$172.1M↓9%$181.4M↑6%$178.0M↑5%$169.6M↓11%$190.4M$191.3M↓6%$202.6M
    Shareholders' Equity$248.2M↑9%$248.2M↑9%$240.0M↑11%$233.2M↑17%$235.1M↑18%$198.6M↑4%$190.2M↓4%$198.4M↓1%$200.7M
    Current Ratio1.74↓8%1.74↓8%1.71↑3%1.81↑21%1.74↑16%1.50↓3%1.55↓4%1.62↑22%1.33
    Debt / Equity0.70↓21%0.70↓21%0.72↓18%0.78↓10%0.76↓11%0.85↓15%1.00↑4%0.96↓5%1.01
    Operating Cash Flow$61.6M↑132%$11.7M↑163%$14.9M↑261%$2.8M↓50%$33.0M↓34%$50.1M↑87%$26.7M↑1%$26.4M↓38%$42.3M
    Free Cash Flow$33.7M↑669%$686.0K↑117%$10.1M↑169%-$3.2M↓390%$8.3M↓74%$32.2M↑447%$5.9M↓57%$13.8M↓43%$24.1M

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Business Services

    MG vs Peers — Financial Grading

    Revenue$724.0MBottom 25%
    Net Income$16.8MMedian
    ROE7.2%Bottom 25%
    D/E0.76Median
    Op. Margin5.6%Median
    Curr. Ratio1.74Top 25%
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP$122.3B$309.93$21.9B$4.4B73.2%0.8224.2%1.054/95/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
    ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA$52.9B$209.70$7.5B$887.0M13.1%0.2215.4%1.051/94/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
    Rubrik, Inc.RBRK$22.6B$109.88$1.3B$348.8M67.1%—-26.2%1.691/90/92/70/3F-Score 62/11
    AECOMACM$9.1B$70.50$16.1B$561.8M22.5%1.096.4%1.141/93/93/71/3F-Score 82/11
    COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT$6.2B$152.07$1.2B$70.7M942.8%—6.3%1.951/92/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
    WPP plcWPP$6.0B$27.79$18.2B$289.5M-8.5%1.942.8%0.891/92/91/70/3F-Score 32/11
    VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS$5.6B$48.94$623.5M$129.3M-21.6%0.76-23.5%1.971/90/91/70/3F-Score 51/11
    ROBERT HALF INC.RHI$4.3B$42.00$5.4B$133.0M10.4%—1.4%1.532/95/91/70/3F-Score 52/11