MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
MMLPAbout the company
Martin Midstream Partners L.P., together with its subsidiaries, provides terminalling, processing, and storage services for petroleum products and by-products in the United States. It operates through four segments: Terminalling and Storage, Transportation, Sulfur Services, and Specialty Products.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
1 / 13
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$4.52
+101.8% vs price
Models with upside
4 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
Models split on MMLP at $2.24 — fair values range $0.69–$11.66
Key risk
No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #839 (Top 27.1%) | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | +30.7% | N/A | +80.8% | N/A | N/A | +61.6% | -224.6% | N/A | N/A | +50.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-23 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-23 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-23 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models80% pass✓ 4✗ 1▾
Models split on MMLP at $2.24 — fair values range $0.69–$11.66
Buffett fair value$3.23✓Buffett+30.7% margin vs $2.24Greenblatt fair value$11.66✓Greenblatt+80.8% margin vs $2.24Munger fair value$5.83✓Munger+61.6% margin vs $2.24Pabrai fair value$0.69✗Pabrai-224.6% margin vs $2.24Ackman fair value$4.52✓Ackman+50.4% margin vs $2.24
Where It Falls Short
- Profitability0% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾
No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion
Positive EPS (10 years)8/25 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)16/25 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)8.5%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)6.8% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$10.7M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROEN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value8.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=8.9%, ROC=15.0%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-2.82%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-0.97% -> -2.82% (delta: -1.86%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.83%, ROA=-2.82%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY58.0% -> 55.5%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-1.1%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman> 12%Margin of Safety✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity11.7% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency16/25 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue6.2%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend8.4% (2023) -> 6.8% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 51.2% -> 55.5%, operating margin 8.4% -> 6.8%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-12.72%; #4297/6340 (top 67.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+76.09%; #281/3702 (top 7.6%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0094; #779/5884 (top 13.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR21.4% over 3 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years3/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage0% pass✗ 15▾
All 12 investors flag MMLP's debt & leverage
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $476.6M vs NCA $48.5M✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: N/A (negative equity), IC: 0.9x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / EquityN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-476.5M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change81.27% -> 81.93%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.35✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt LevelsN/A (non-positive equity)✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=0.9x, D/EBITDA=4.7x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Growth13% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾
7 of 8 flag MMLP's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 39.3% vs Rev: 13.2%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency16/25 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-11.3%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 51.2% -> 55.5%, operating margin 8.4% -> 6.8%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR1.3%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR21.4% over 3 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency13% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
7 of 8 flag MMLP's efficiency — Graham, Greenblatt, Piotroski +4 more
Current Ratio1.35✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)11.5%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+1.5%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)15.0%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.13 -> 1.05✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.31x -> 1.37x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.35✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital10.4%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=14.8%; FY2024: ROIC=12.3%; FY2025: ROIC=11.3%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)2/5 years above 12% (latest 11.3%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Verdicts13% pass✓ 2✗ 14▾
Split decision: 13 FAIL · 2 PASS · 1 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (0/7)✗GreenblattRank #839✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (1/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #814/963 (Top 84.5%)) - Valuation23% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾
10 of 13 flag MMLP's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value8.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=8.9%, ROC=15.0%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)1.9x✓Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per ShareN/A (negative BVPS)✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=12.2%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=24.4%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical Average✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share4.1x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low113% of trailing low ($1.98)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-12.72%; #4297/6340 (top 67.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization-1.0784; #6046/6449 (top 93.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+9.2102; #335/5247 (top 6.4%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-21.29%; #3537/4519 (top 78.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-12.16%; #3554/6202 (top 57.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
5 of 10 pass — Buffett, Lynch, Ackman +2 more object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$10.7M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-18.7M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$46.1M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.83%, ROA=-2.82%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)1.9x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=24.4%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive15/17 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-21.3%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share4.1x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency25/25 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-18.7M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-21.29%; #3537/4519 (top 78.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.1% of shares last year, 0.4% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- $797.0K
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $87.6Mcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $109.2Mest. | $140.4Mest. | $87.0Mest. | $123.0Mest. | $115.4Mest. |
| Revenue | $807.2M↑13% | $231.7M↑37% | $213.6M↑18% | $187.7M↓3% | $716.1M↑1% | $707.6M↓11% | $798.0M↓22% | $1.0B↑15% | $882.4M |
| Operating Income | $50.2M↑17% | $10.2M↑48% | $19.3M↑29% | $8.0M↓44% | $48.9M↓15% | $57.3M↓14% | $66.7M↑30% | $51.3M↓11% | $57.3M |
| Net Income | -$11.2M↑46% | -$4.1M↑51% | $2.6M↑210% | -$6.8M↓554% | -$14.7M↓183% | -$5.2M↓14% | -$4.5M↑56% | -$10.3M↓4798% | -$211.0K |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.10↑52% | $0.07↑217% | $-0.17↓467% | $-0.37↓185% | $-0.13↓18% | $-0.11↑58% | $-0.26↓2500% | $-0.01 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | 55.5%↓4% | 58.0%↑13% | 51.2%↑32% | 38.8%↓2% | 39.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2%↑3% | 4.4%↑8% | 9.0%↑9% | 4.3%↓43% | 6.8%↓16% | 8.1%↓3% | 8.4%↑66% | 5.0%↓22% | 6.5% |
| ROE | 11.8%↓53% | — | — | — | 17.2%↑132% | 7.4%↑5% | 7.0%↓60% | 17.4%↑3858% | 0.4% |
| Total Debt | $476.6M↑8% | $476.6M↑8% | $453.7M↑6% | $458.4M↑2% | $428.0M↓2% | $437.6M↑4% | $421.2M↓18% | $512.9M↑3% | $499.2M |
| Shareholders' Equity | -$94.5M↓14% | -$94.5M↓14% | -$90.2M↓22% | -$92.7M↓29% | -$85.8M↓22% | -$70.4M↓9% | -$64.6M↓9% | -$59.4M↓24% | -$48.0M |
| Current Ratio | 1.35↑13% | 1.35↑13% | 1.21↑7% | 1.26↓7% | 1.05↓7% | 1.13↓1% | 1.14↓40% | 1.90↑14% | 1.67 |
| Debt / Equity | -5.04↑5% | -5.04↑5% | -5.03↑13% | -4.95↑22% | -4.99↑20% | -6.21↑5% | -6.52↑24% | -8.63↑17% | -10.39 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $16.0M↓76% | -$4.9M↓302% | $12.2M↓61% | -$13.8M↓129% | $46.1M↓5% | $48.4M↓65% | $137.5M↑751% | $16.1M↓55% | $35.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$18.7M↓147% | -$15.7M↓98% | $2.7M↓90% | -$21.3M↓79% | $21.4M↑237% | $6.3M↓94% | $103.2M↑1030% | -$11.1M↓156% | $19.7M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Wholesale
MMLP vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCKESSON CORPMCK | $127.3B | $1102.81 | $403.4B | $4.8B | -219.2% | -3.00 | 1.5% | 0.85 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 1/11 |
| W.W. GRAINGER, INC.GWW | $69.7B | $1489.30 | $17.9B | $1.7B | 45.7% | 0.67 | 13.9% | 2.83 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| CARDINAL HEALTH INCCAH | $65.0B | $281.10 | $254.2B | $1.7B | -59.5% | -3.08 | 1.0% | 0.88 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 8 | 1/11 |
| SYSCO CORPSYY | $38.0B | $77.10 | $81.4B | $1.8B | 99.9% | — | 3.8% | 1.21 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 5/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 2/11 |
| RELIANCE, INC.RS | $21.8B | $427.33 | $14.3B | $739.4M | 10.3% | 0.20 | 7.1% | 4.88 | 4/9 | 7/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 5/11 |
| WATSCO INCWSO | $12.8B | $308.46 | $7.2B | $497.0M | 17.9% | 0.17 | 10.0% | 4.12 | 5/9 | 7/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 8/11 |
| APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INCAIT | $10.9B | $297.60 | $4.6B | $393.0M | 21.3% | 0.31 | 10.9% | 3.32 | 6/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 7/11 |
| POOL CORPPOOL | $7.7B | $216.20 | $5.3B | $406.4M | 34.3% | 1.01 | 11.0% | 2.24 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 6/11 |