MATERIALISE NV

MTLS

Materialise NV provides additive manufacturing and medical software tools, and 3D printing services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific. The company operates through three segments: Materialise Software, Materialise Medical, and Materialise Manufacturing. The Materialise Software segment offers proprietary software through programs and platforms that enable and enhance the functionality of 3D printers, and printing operations.

About the company

Price: $6.49Market Cap: $369.9M

Investment snapshot

18%positive consensus

Scored 1d ago

Positive

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 10

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$2.21

-65.9% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

10 of 12 pass — Marks and Asness object

Key risk

MTLS overvalued: all 9 models price fair value below $6.49 (median $2.21)

Framework analysis

Verdict	Meaning
BUY	Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASS	The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRAL	Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAIL	The company does not clear the framework's requirements.
Ranked	Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

Metric	Graham Defensive Value	Buffett Quality Compounder	Lynch GARP	Greenblatt Magic Formula	Piotroski F-Score	Dreman Contrarian Value	Munger Quality Focus	Pabrai Dhandho Framework	Akre Three-Legged Stool	Marks Risk-Aware Value	Ackman Activist Value	Templeton Global Bargain Hunter	Sleep Scale Economies Shared	Asness Systematic Factors	Neff Low-P/E Total Return	Schloss Asset-Value Discipline	O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite
Verdict	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL · Rank #1620 (Top 52.3%)	NEUTRAL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	PASS	NEUTRAL	PASS	BUY	FAIL	FAIL	NEUTRAL
Score
Analysis	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)		N/A			N/A			N/A					N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Margin of Safety	-33.5%	N/A	-8.5%	-1019.0%	N/A	-308.2%	-193.7%	N/A	-153.5%	-1172.5%	-188.4%	-415.1%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Financial Basis	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-22 Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

Debt & Leverage83% pass✓ 13✗ 2▾
10 of 12 pass — Marks and Asness object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $24.1M vs NCA $91.9M
✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.17, IC: 7.3x
✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
Total Debt / Equity0.17
✓Lynch< 0.33
Cash - Long-term Debt$82.3M
✓LynchPositive preferred
LT Debt / Total Assets Change8.47% -> 5.85%
✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.86
✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.17
✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
Debt Levels0.17
✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=7.3x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)
✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.17
✓Ackman<= 1.0
Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1661; #1554/4210 (top 36.9%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

Valuation models0% pass✗ 9▾
MTLS overvalued: all 9 models price fair value below $6.49 (median $2.21)
Graham fair value$4.86
✗Graham-33.5% margin vs $6.49
Lynch fair value$5.98
✗Lynch-8.5% margin vs $6.49
Greenblatt fair value$0.58
✗Greenblatt-1019.0% margin vs $6.49
Dreman fair value$1.59
✗Dreman-308.2% margin vs $6.49
Munger fair value$2.21
✗Munger-193.7% margin vs $6.49
Akre fair value$2.56
✗Akre-153.5% margin vs $6.49
Marks fair value$0.51
✗Marks-1172.5% margin vs $6.49
Ackman fair value$2.25
✗Ackman-188.4% margin vs $6.49
Templeton fair value$1.26
✗Templeton-415.1% margin vs $6.49
Valuation8% pass✓ 5✗ 23▾
12 of 13 flag MTLS's valuation — Graham, Greenblatt, Dreman +9 more
Price / Book Value per Share1.5x
✗Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
Price / 3-yr avg EPS61.1x
✗Graham<= 15x
Price-to-Book Ratio1.5x
✓Graham<= 1.5x
P/E x P/B90.60
✗Graham<= 22.5
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.58
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
EBIT / Enterprise Value3.2%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.2%, ROC=8.2%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Price / EPS27.1x
✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
Price / (CFO / Shares)11.7x
✗Dreman< 8x
Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=27.1x
✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=27.1x, FCF Yield=1.9%
✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=27.1x, P/B=1.5x
✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
Discount to Intrinsic Value-307.6% (IV=$1.59 vs Price=$6.49)
✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Price / FCF per Share54.1x
✗Ackman<= 25
Price vs. Trailing Low132% of trailing low ($4.92)
✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
Net income / market capitalization+3.78%; #2102/6340 (top 33.2%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.6993; #2205/6449 (top 34.2%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Price / Diluted EPS27.1x
✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
Price / Tangible Book Value per Share2.10x
✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
Book Value per Share Change+49.0%
✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
Revenue / market capitalization+0.7504; #2121/5247 (top 40.4%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.91%; #2261/4519 (top 50.0%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+28.01%; #1070/6202 (top 17.3%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Profitability13% pass✓ 11✗ 24▾
14 of 16 flag MTLS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)5/10 years positive
✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
✗Graham>= 33% growth
Net Income Positive (10+ years)5/10 years positive
✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)1.5%
✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
Operating Margin (10-yr trend)3.5% (latest)
✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
Free Cash Flow Proxy
✗BuffettPositive and growing
Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)3.71
✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
Retained Earnings Effectiveness
✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.58
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR46.7%
✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
ROE5.4%
✗Lynch> 15%
EBIT / Enterprise Value3.2%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.2%, ROC=8.2%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Net Income / Total Assets3.39%
✓PiotroskiROA > 0
ROA Change YoY1.69% -> 3.39% (delta: +1.70%)
✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.94%, ROA=3.39%
✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Gross Margin Change YoY56.7% -> 56.5%
✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
Pre-Tax Income / Revenue5.3%
✗Dreman>= 8%
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity5.4%
✗Dreman> 12%
Margin of SafetyP/E=27.1x, P/B=1.5x
✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
Return on Equity2.4% (3-yr avg)
✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
Discount to Intrinsic Value-307.6% (IV=$1.59 vs Price=$6.49)
✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Positive Net Income Frequency5/10 years positive
✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
Operating Income / Revenue3.5%
✗Ackman>= 15%
Net Income / Shareholders Equity5.4%
✗Ackman>= 15%
5-Year EPS CAGR46.7% CAGR over 5 years
✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Operating Margin Trend-1.2% (2022) -> 3.5% (2024)
✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 55.5% -> 56.5%, operating margin -1.2% -> 3.5%
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
Net income / market capitalization+3.78%; #2102/6340 (top 33.2%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Gross profit / total assets+38.06%; #1026/3702 (top 27.7%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Net income / positive book equity+5.41%; #2413/5226 (top 46.2%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0215; #1532/5884 (top 26.0%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR46.7% over 5 years
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Positive Diluted-EPS Years5/10 years positive
✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
7 of 8 flag MTLS's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +4 more
Current Ratio1.86
✗Graham>= 2.0
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)1.9%
✗Buffett> 10%
ROIC - WACC-8.1%
✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)8.2%
✗Greenblatt> 25%
Current Ratio Change YoY1.97 -> 1.86
✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.65x -> 0.67x
✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.86
✓Dreman> 1.5
Return on Invested Capital2.6%
✗Munger> 15%
ROIC (high and growing)FY2022: ROIC=-0.7%; FY2023: ROIC=1.5%; FY2024: ROIC=2.6%
✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
Reinvestment Rate x ROIC2.6% (RR=100% x ROIC=2.6%)
✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 2.6%)
✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Verdicts21% pass✓ 3✗ 11▾
Split decision: 10 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS · 1 BUY
Overall verdict
✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #1620•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #156/2370 (Top 6.6%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
Growth38% pass✓ 7✗ 6▾
5 of 8 flag MTLS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Marks +2 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
✗Graham>= 33% growth
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.58
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR46.7%
✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
Inventory Growth vs Revenue Growth
✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
EPS Growth Direction$-0.07 (2015) -> $0.24 (2024)
✓DremanPositive over recent years
EPS CAGR23.1% CAGR over 6 years
✓Dreman> 5% annualized
Positive Net Income Frequency5/10 years positive
✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
3yr Median Revenue Growth6.3%
✓Ackman>= 5%
Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
5-Year EPS CAGR46.7% CAGR over 5 years
✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 55.5% -> 56.5%, operating margin -1.2% -> 3.5%
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
5-year Revenue CAGR4.7%
✗SleepCAGR > 7%
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR46.7% over 5 years
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾
6 of 10 flag MTLS's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Dreman +3 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy
✗BuffettPositive and growing
FCF Positive and Growing$7.1M
✗LynchPositive and growing
Operating Cash Flow$32.7M
✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.94%, ROA=3.39%
✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Price / (CFO / Shares)11.7x
✗Dreman< 8x
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=27.1x, FCF Yield=1.9%
✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
FCF Positive6/6 years FCF positive
✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap1.8%
✗Ackman>= 4%
Price / FCF per Share54.1x
✗Ackman<= 25
Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency6/6 years positive
✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$7.1M
✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.91%; #2261/4519 (top 50.0%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2024. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Business Services

Size: Small Cap($369.9M)

Revenue: $277.6M-2.1% YoY

Net Income: $14.0M+87.9% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin3.5%

Return on Equity5.4%

Debt / Equity0.17

Current Ratio1.86

EPS (Diluted)$0.24+96.6% 1y

Shares Retired0.0% / 0.0% 2y

Similar Companies

ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC

$122.3B

EAELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2024

Retired 0.0% of shares last year, 0.0% over two.

Buybacks: —
Dividends: —

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY24

96.6% = 87.9% + 4.6%

Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

Metric	FY 2024 Sources 20-F · 2025-04-22	FY 2023 Sources 20-F · 2024-04-12	FY 2022 Sources 20-F · 2023-04-18	FY 2021 Sources 20-F · 2022-05-02	FY 2020 Sources 20-F · 2021-04-30
Market Cap	$369.9Mcurrent	$334.9Mest.	$622.6Mest.	$1.2Best.	$3.5Best.
Revenue	$277.6M↓2%	$283.5M↑15%	$247.4M↑6%	$232.7M↑11%	$209.7M
Operating Income	$9.8M↑58%	$6.2M↑303%	-$3.1M↓122%	$13.8M↑343%	-$5.7M
Net Income	$14.0M↑88%	$7.4M↑429%	-$2.3M↓115%	$14.9M↑272%	-$8.7M
EPS (Diluted)	$0.24↑97%	$0.12↑386%	$-0.04↓116%	$0.26↑259%	$-0.16
Gross Margin	56.5%	56.7%↑2%	55.5%↓4%	57.5%↑4%	55.2%
Operating Margin	3.5%↑61%	2.2%↑277%	-1.2%↓121%	5.9%↑319%	-2.7%
ROE	5.4%↑90%	2.8%↑406%	-0.9%↓116%	5.7%↑207%	-5.3%
Total Debt	$43.0M↓34%	$65.4M↓19%	$80.9M↓28%	$112.2M↓21%	$141.6M
Shareholders' Equity	$258.7M↓1%	$261.9M↑7%	$244.1M↓7%	$263.4M↑61%	$163.8M
Current Ratio	1.86↓5%	1.97↓4%	2.04↓28%	2.82↑48%	1.90
Debt / Equity	0.17↓33%	0.25↓25%	0.33↓22%	0.43↓51%	0.86
Operating Cash Flow	$32.7M↑47%	$22.3M↓6%	$23.8M↓19%	$29.3M↓21%	$36.9M
Free Cash Flow	$7.1M↓41%	$12.1M↑1568%	$724.9K↓96%	$20.3M↓13%	$23.3M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Business Services

MTLS vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$277.6MBottom 25%

Net Income$14.0MMedian

ROE5.4%Bottom 25%

D/E0.17Top 25%

Op. Margin3.5%Median

Curr. Ratio1.86Top 25%

Company	Market Cap	Price	Revenue	Net Income	ROE	D/E	Op. Margin	Curr. Ratio	Graham	Buffett	Lynch	Greenblatt	Piotroski	Dreman
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP	$122.3B	$309.93	$21.9B	$4.4B	73.2%	0.82	24.2%	1.05	4/9	5/9	3/7	0/3	F-Score 6	5/11
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA	$52.9B	$209.70	$7.5B	$887.0M	13.1%	0.22	15.4%	1.05	1/9	4/9	4/7	0/3	F-Score 6	6/11
Rubrik, Inc.RBRK	$22.6B	$109.88	$1.3B	$348.8M	67.1%	—	-26.2%	1.69	1/9	0/9	2/7	0/3	F-Score 6	2/11
AECOMACM	$9.1B	$70.50	$16.1B	$561.8M	22.5%	1.09	6.4%	1.14	1/9	3/9	3/7	1/3	F-Score 8	2/11
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT	$6.2B	$152.07	$1.2B	$70.7M	942.8%	—	6.3%	1.95	1/9	2/9	4/7	0/3	F-Score 6	6/11
WPP plcWPP	$6.0B	$27.79	$18.2B	$289.5M	-8.5%	1.94	2.8%	0.89	1/9	2/9	1/7	0/3	F-Score 3	2/11
VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS	$5.6B	$48.94	$623.5M	$129.3M	-21.6%	0.76	-23.5%	1.97	1/9	0/9	1/7	0/3	F-Score 5	1/11
ROBERT HALF INC.RHI	$4.3B	$42.00	$5.4B	$133.0M	10.4%	—	1.4%	1.53	2/9	5/9	1/7	0/3	F-Score 5	2/11