MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp

MX
About the company

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and supplies analog and mixed-signal semiconductor platform solutions for communications, the Internet of Things, consumer, computing, industrial, and automotive applications.

Country: United StatesPrice: $2.50Market Cap: $95.1M

Investment snapshot

12%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

2

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 11

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$8.76

+250.4% vs price

Models with upside

1 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictPASSFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2551 (Top 82.4%)FAILFAILPASSFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A+71.5%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-16

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-16

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-16

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-16

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-16

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾

    8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $17.1M vs NCA $105.4M
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: -28.6x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.19
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$69.8M
    ✓LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change7.17% -> 12.69%
    ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.65
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.19
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.19
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-28.6x, D/EBITDA=N/A
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.19
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1920; #1652/4210 (top 39.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation0% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾

    No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.4x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-76.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-76.8%, ROC=-28.0%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.4x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-51.6%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-57.0%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.4x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low104% of trailing low ($2.41)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-31.62%; #4829/6340 (top 76.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+2.5799; #528/6449 (top 8.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.37x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change-29.0%
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+1.8445; #1155/5247 (top 22.0%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-35.26%; #3729/4519 (top 82.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-16.39%; #3799/6202 (top 61.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth0% pass✗ 13▾

    All 8 investors flag MX's growth

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 8.2% vs Rev: -12.8%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$1.89 (2010) -> $-0.82 (2025)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR-4.0% CAGR over 11 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency6/17 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-14.6%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency1/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 22.4% -> 17.6%, operating margin -25.1% -> -20.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR-18.8%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-12.0% over 4 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾

    15 of 16 flag MX's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)6/23 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)6/23 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-6.3%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-20.0% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-46.8M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)7.57
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-12.3%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-76.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-76.8%, ROC=-28.0%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-8.46%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-14.32% -> -8.46% (delta: +5.86%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-6.89%, ROA=-8.46%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY19.7% -> 17.6%
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-24.3%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-12.3%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/B=0.4x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-14.1% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency6/17 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-24.2%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-12.3%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-25.1% (2023) -> -20.0% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 22.4% -> 17.6%, operating margin -25.1% -> -20.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-31.62%; #4829/6340 (top 76.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+7.50%; #2962/3702 (top 80.0%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-12.26%; #3481/5226 (top 66.6%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0825; #3241/5884 (top 55.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-12.0% over 4 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years3/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾

    Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✓GrahamPASS (4/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #2551✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1610/2370 (Top 67.9%))✗NeffFAIL (0/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Cash Flow20% pass✓ 3✗ 9▾

    8 of 10 flag MX's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +5 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-46.8M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-33.5M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-24.2M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-6.89%, ROA=-8.46%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-57.0%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive11/20 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-37.0%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency14/20 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-33.5M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-35.26%; #3729/4519 (top 82.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾

    6 of 8 flag MX's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

    Current Ratio2.65
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-4.5%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-14.5%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-28.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY4.74 -> 4.07
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.52x -> 0.51x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.65
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital-11.5%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-13.2%; FY2024: ROIC=-7.4%; FY2025: ROIC=-11.4%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)1/5 years above 12% (latest -11.4%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Electronic Equipment
SIC Sector: Electronic & Electrical Equipment
Size: Micro Cap($95.1M)
Revenue: $178.9M-8.9% YoY
Net Income: $29.7M+45.3% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-20.0%
Return on Equity-12.0%
Debt / Equity0.00
Current Ratio4.07
EPS (Diluted)$-0.82
Buybacks (1y)$4.4M
Buybacks (2y)$17.3M
Shares Retired1.9% / 6.8% 2y

Similar Companies

NVDANVIDIA CORP
$3.93T
INTCINTEL CORP
$317.1B
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
$277.4B
ADIANALOG DEVICES INC
$192.8B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 1.9% of shares last year, 6.8% over two.

Buybacks
$4.4M
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-16
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-03-14
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-03-08
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-22
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-02-23
Market Cap$95.1Mcurrent------$105.0Mest.$149.5Mest.$253.7Mest.$464.5Mest.$812.3Mest.
Revenue$175.5M↓13%$44.0M↓4%$44.7M↓6%$46.2M↑3%$178.9M↓9%$196.4M↓15%$230.1M↓32%$337.7M↓29%$474.2M
Operating Income-$42.5M↓4%-$12.9M↓12%-$10.0M↓34%-$7.2M↓14%-$35.9M↓38%-$26.0M↑55%-$57.6M↓999%-$5.2M↓106%$83.4M
Net Income-$30.1M↑21%-$12.5M↑4%-$4.8M↓1591%-$4.6M↑48%-$29.7M↑45%-$54.3M↓48%-$36.6M↓356%-$8.0M↓114%$56.7M
EPS (Diluted)--$-0.34↑6%$-0.13↓1400%$-0.13↑46%$-0.82↑43%$-1.44↓62%$-0.89↓394%$-0.18↓115%$1.21
Gross Margin14.7%↓32%14.0%↓24%19.3%↓5%15.6%↓26%17.6%↓11%19.7%↓12%22.4%↓25%30.0%↓7%32.4%
Operating Margin-24.2%↓19%-29.3%↓17%-22.3%↓43%-15.5%↓10%-20.0%↓52%-13.2%↑47%-25.1%↓1513%-1.6%↓109%17.6%
ROE-12.3%↑17%———-12.0%↑39%-19.6%↓85%-10.6%↓466%-1.9%↓115%12.5%
Total Debt$47.1M↑12950%$47.1M↑12950%$41.5M↑10279%$42.3M↑10189%$258.0K↓42%$447.0K↓23%$578.0K↑278%$153.0K↑9%$141.0K
Shareholders' Equity$245.4M↓4%$245.4M↓4%$226.5M↓16%$232.8M↓14%$248.3M↓10%$276.8M↓20%$344.6M↓20%$428.2M↓5%$452.8M
Current Ratio2.65↓39%2.65↓39%2.43↓48%2.37↓47%4.07↓14%4.74↓9%5.23↓27%7.15↑49%4.79
Debt / Equity0.19↑13478%0.19↑13478%0.18↑12278%0.18↑11797%0.00↓36%0.00↓4%0.00↑369%0.00↑15%0.00
Operating Cash Flow-$15.7M↑12%-$21.1M↓13155%-$4.5K↑100%$1.6K↑100%-$24.2M↓295%-$6.1M↓103%-$3.0M↓158%$5.2M↓94%$87.7M
Free Cash Flow-$33.5M↑25%-$28.7M↓283%-$5.8K↑100%-$2.4K↑100%-$54.2M↓206%-$17.7M↓78%-$10.0M↑45%-$18.2M↓133%$55.5M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Electronic Equipment

MX vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$178.9MBottom 25%
Net Income$29.7MBottom 25%
ROE-12.0%Bottom 25%
D/E0.00Top 25%
Op. Margin-20.0%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio4.07Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
NVIDIA CORPNVDA$3.93T$162.85$215.9B$120.1B76.3%0.0560.4%3.913/96/93/71/3F-Score 45/11
INTEL CORPINTC$317.1B$59.66$52.9B$267.0M-0.2%0.41-4.2%2.023/90/91/70/3F-Score 63/11
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCTXN$277.4B$303.60$17.7B$5.0B30.7%0.8634.1%4.356/95/93/71/3F-Score 77/11
ANALOG DEVICES INCADI$192.8B$397.97$11.0B$2.3B6.7%0.2426.6%2.192/93/94/71/3F-Score 84/11
Motorola Solutions, Inc.MSI$87.8B$531.20$11.7B$2.2B89.4%3.4925.6%1.042/94/93/71/3F-Score 65/11
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/LHX$50.7B$272.35—$1.6B8.2%0.57—1.192/92/93/71/3F-Score 73/11
NOKIA CORPNOK$45.7B$8.07$23.4B$764.7M3.1%0.164.4%1.582/91/93/71/3F-Score 53/11
ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE COERIC$34.2B$10.56$25.7B$3.1B26.0%0.3016.3%1.292/95/95/73/3F-Score 77/11