Nano Dimension Ltd.
NNDMAbout the company
Nano Dimension Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides industrial manufacturing solutions for design-to-manufacturing of electronics and mechanical parts in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
4 / 10
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
—
No comparable estimates
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #2761 (Top 89.2%) | PASS | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-31 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.01, IC: -1264.2x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.01✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities7.48✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.01✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.01✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-1264.2x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.01✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0079; #575/4210 (top 13.7%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio0.5x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-318.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-318.1%, ROC=-47.8%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share0.5x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-106.2%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-29.0%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.5x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($1.24)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-119.32%; #5480/6340 (top 86.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+1.7612; #765/6449 (top 11.9%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.52x✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-82.9%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.4167; #2869/5247 (top 54.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-29.02%; #3647/4519 (top 80.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-28.32%; #4341/6202 (top 70.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-273.9M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-71.3M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-70.3M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-11.01%, ROA=-45.95%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-29.0%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive0/6 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-27.7%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/6 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-71.3M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-29.02%; #3647/4519 (top 80.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Profitability13% pass✓ 5✗ 30▾
14 of 16 flag NNDM's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/11 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/11 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-18.0%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-137.0% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-273.9M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-53.1%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-318.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-318.1%, ROC=-47.8%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-45.95%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-10.95% -> -45.95% (delta: -35.00%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-11.01%, ROA=-45.95%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY43.1% -> 33.5%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-105.0%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-53.1%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=0.5x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-23.4% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/10 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-137.0%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-53.1%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-229.6% (2023) -> -137.0% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 46.3% -> 33.5%, operating margin -229.6% -> -137.0%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-119.32%; #5480/6340 (top 86.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+5.38%; #3084/3702 (top 83.3%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-53.13%; #4244/5226 (top 81.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1614; #4001/5884 (top 68.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years0/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
7 of 8 flag NNDM's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 94.6% vs Rev: 77.3%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-0.22 (2016) -> $-1.36 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/10 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth29.1%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 46.3% -> 33.5%, operating margin -229.6% -> -137.0%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR97.6%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts15% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
Split decision: 10 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #2761✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1826/2370 (Top 77.0%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag NNDM's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio7.48✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-19.7%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-29.7%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-47.8%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY26.22 -> 10.02✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.06x -> 0.16x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities7.48✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital-20.0%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-10.1%; FY2024: ROIC=-8.2%; FY2025: ROIC=-20.0%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/3 years above 12% (latest -20.0%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 3.6% of shares last year, 12.8% over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: depreciation amortization, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $245.8Mcurrent | -- | -- | $370.2Mest. | $498.4Mest. | $572.6Mest. | $713.7Mest. | $944.6Mest. |
| Revenue | $31.9M | $29.0M | $29.7M | $102.4M↑77% | $57.8M↑3% | $56.3M↑29% | $43.6M↑366% | $9.4M |
| Operating Income | -$39.0M | -$20.6M | -$64.5M | -$140.3M↓57% | -$89.6M↑31% | -$129.3M↑25% | -$171.5M | -- |
| Net Income | -$38.7M | -$6.8M | -$69.7M | -$293.3M↓197% | -$98.8M↓77% | -$56.0M↑75% | -$227.4M↓483979% | $47.0K |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.03 | $-0.34 | $-1.36↓202% | $-0.45↓96% | $-0.23↑74% | $-0.88↓6% | $-0.83 |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 45.9% | 40.8% | 33.5%↓22% | 43.1%↓7% | 46.3%↑44% | 32.2%↑169% | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | -122.1% | -71.0% | -217.0% | -137.0%↑12% | -155.1%↑32% | -229.6%↑42% | -393.1% | — |
| ROE | — | — | — | -53.1%↓362% | -11.5%↓108% | -5.5%↑72% | -19.8%↓565570% | 0.0% |
| Total Debt | $3.4M | $3.3M | $3.1M | $3.0M↑2055% | $138.0K↓56% | $316.0K | -- | $5.4M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $432.9M | $481.5M | $485.4M | $552.0M↓36% | $860.0M↓15% | $1.0B↓12% | $1.1B↓14% | $1.3B |
| Current Ratio | 7.48 | 10.66 | 9.01 | 10.02↓62% | 26.22↑1% | 25.93↓10% | 28.74↓30% | 41.00 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01↑3258% | 0.00↓48% | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$24.1M | -- | -$7.1M | -$70.3M↓271% | -$18.9M↑72% | -$68.7M↑25% | -$92.1M↓116% | -$42.6M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$24.5M | -- | -$7.2M | -$71.3M↓238% | -$21.1M↑73% | -$77.8M↑23% | -$101.4M↓94% | -$52.4M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Electronic Equipment
NNDM vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPNVDA | $3.93T | $162.85 | $215.9B | $120.1B | 76.3% | 0.05 | 60.4% | 3.91 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 5/11 |
| INTEL CORPINTC | $317.1B | $59.66 | $52.9B | $267.0M | -0.2% | 0.41 | -4.2% | 2.02 | 3/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCTXN | $277.4B | $303.60 | $17.7B | $5.0B | 30.7% | 0.86 | 34.1% | 4.35 | 6/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |
| ANALOG DEVICES INCADI | $192.8B | $397.97 | $11.0B | $2.3B | 6.7% | 0.24 | 26.6% | 2.19 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 4/11 |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc.MSI | $87.8B | $531.20 | $11.7B | $2.2B | 89.4% | 3.49 | 25.6% | 1.04 | 2/9 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/LHX | $50.7B | $272.35 | — | $1.6B | 8.2% | 0.57 | — | 1.19 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 3/11 |
| NOKIA CORPNOK | $45.7B | $8.07 | $23.4B | $764.7M | 3.1% | 0.16 | 4.4% | 1.58 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE COERIC | $34.2B | $10.56 | $25.7B | $3.1B | 26.0% | 0.30 | 16.3% | 1.29 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 5/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |