NetApp, Inc.
NTAPAbout the company
NetApp, Inc. provides a range of enterprise software, systems, and services that customers use to transform their data infrastructures in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through two segments, Hybrid Cloud and Public Cloud.
Investment snapshot
Positive
6
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 7
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$79.59
-56.1% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
6 of 8 pass — Graham and Dreman object
Key risk
NTAP overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $181.37 (median $79.59)
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | BUY · Rank #356 (Top 11.5%) | BUY | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | PASS | BUY | BUY | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
| Margin of Safety | -477.8% | -12.7% | -97.3% | -219.4% | N/A | -117.9% | -21.9% | -161.3% | -539.3% | -202.9% | -16.4% | -127.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-06-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 vs 2025-07-25 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-06-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-06-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-06-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-06-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-02 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Efficiency75% pass✓ 9✗ 2▾
6 of 8 pass — Graham and Dreman object
Current Ratio1.24✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)116.0%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+106.0%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)248.5%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.26 -> 1.44✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.55x -> 0.58x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.24✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital36.7%✓Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=27.1%; FY2024: ROIC=24.7%; FY2025: ROIC=34.5%✓AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC26.0% (RR=71% x ROIC=36.7%)✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)5/5 years above 12% (latest 34.5%)✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Cash Flow60% pass✓ 8✗ 4▾
6 of 10 pass — Lynch, Dreman, Pabrai +1 more object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.3B✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$1.6B✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$2.1B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=19.24%, ROA=11.88%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)17.2x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=28.6x, FCF Yield=5.2%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive20/20 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap4.6%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share19.0x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency26/26 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$1.6B✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+4.63%; #1652/4519 (top 36.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation models0% pass✗ 11▾
NTAP overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $181.37 (median $79.59)
Graham fair value$31.39✗Graham-477.8% margin vs $181.37Buffett fair value$160.96✗Buffett-12.7% margin vs $181.37Lynch fair value$91.92✗Lynch-97.3% margin vs $181.37Greenblatt fair value$56.79✗Greenblatt-219.4% margin vs $181.37Dreman fair value$83.25✗Dreman-117.9% margin vs $181.37Munger fair value$148.79✗Munger-21.9% margin vs $181.37Pabrai fair value$69.41✗Pabrai-161.3% margin vs $181.37Akre fair value$28.37✗Akre-539.3% margin vs $181.37Marks fair value$59.88✗Marks-202.9% margin vs $181.37Ackman fair value$155.84✗Ackman-16.4% margin vs $181.37Templeton fair value$79.59✗Templeton-127.9% margin vs $181.37 - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾
11 of 12 flag NTAP's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $1.9B vs NCA $1.1B✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.84, IC: 15.4x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity1.66✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-365.0M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change22.96% -> 23.15%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.24✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.66✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels1.66✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=15.4x, D/EBITDA=1.3x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity1.66✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.6642; #3663/4210 (top 87.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation8% pass✓ 3✗ 25▾
12 of 13 flag NTAP's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS32.7x✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio26.3x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B859.50✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.97✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value5.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.1%, ROC=248.5%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS28.6x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)17.2x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share26.3x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=28.6x, OE Yield=3.5%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=28.6x, FCF Yield=5.2%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=28.6x, P/B=26.3x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-117.9% (IV=$83.25 vs Price=$181.37)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share19.0x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low206% of trailing low ($87.84)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+3.98%; #2016/6340 (top 31.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.0420; #5042/6449 (top 78.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS28.6x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.55✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+124.7%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.2017; #3776/5247 (top 72.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+4.63%; #1652/4519 (top 36.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+89.06%; #382/6202 (top 6.2%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth38% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾
5 of 8 flag NTAP's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +2 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.97✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.5%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 182.0% vs Rev: 9.0%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency28/28 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth4.4%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR14.5% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 78.4% -> 78.5%, operating margin 21.5% -> 26.8%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR1.7%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR14.5% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualized - Profitability50% pass✓ 24✗ 11▾
8 of 16 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +5 more object
Positive EPS (10 years)28/28 years positive✓GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)28/28 years positive✓BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)103.3%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)26.8% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$1.3B✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.97✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.5%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE94.8%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value5.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.1%, ROC=248.5%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets11.88%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY10.96% -> 11.88% (delta: +0.92%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=19.24%, ROA=11.88%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY78.1% -> 78.5%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue25.4%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity94.8%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=28.6x, P/B=26.3x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity98.2% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value-117.9% (IV=$83.25 vs Price=$181.37)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency28/28 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue25.7%✓Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity94.8%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR14.5% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend21.5% (2023) -> 26.8% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 78.4% -> 78.5%, operating margin 21.5% -> 26.8%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+3.98%; #2016/6340 (top 31.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+47.65%; #722/3702 (top 19.5%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+94.85%; #87/5226 (top 1.7%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0130; #1016/5884 (top 17.3%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR14.5% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts50% pass✓ 7✗ 7▾
Split decision: 7 FAIL · 3 PASS · 3 BUY · 3 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✓BuffettPASS (5/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✓GreenblattRank #356✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)•AkreNEUTRAL (4/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (7/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✓SleepBUY (5/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #317/2370 (Top 13.4%))•NeffNEUTRAL (4/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #325/963 (Top 33.7%))
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 2.2% of shares last year, 4.8% over two.
- Buybacks
- $950.0M
- Dividends
- $413.0M
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-07-31 2025-07-26 – 2026-07-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense. | Q1 · 2026-07-31 2026-04-25 – 2026-07-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.6Bcurrent | -- | $18.7Best. | $23.7Best. | $17.1Best. | $13.0Best. | $17.2Best. |
| Revenue | $7.2B↑9% | $1.8B↑17% | $6.2B↑6% | $5.9B↑4% | $5.7B↓11% | $6.4B↑1% | $6.3B |
| Operating Income | $1.8B↑36% | $484.0M↑57% | $1.7B↑25% | $1.3B↑10% | $1.2B↑19% | $1.0B↓12% | $1.2B |
| Net Income | $1.4B↑21% | $375.0M↑61% | $1.3B↑8% | $1.2B↑20% | $986.0M↓23% | $1.3B↑36% | $937.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $1.88↑63% | $6.35↑12% | $5.67↑22% | $4.63↓20% | $5.79↑42% | $4.09 |
| Gross Margin | 72.7%↑4% | 78.0%↑11% | 78.5%↑1% | 78.1% | 78.4%↑18% | 66.2%↓1% | 66.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7%↑24% | 26.6%↑34% | 26.8%↑19% | 22.6%↑5% | 21.5%↑34% | 16.0%↓13% | 18.3% |
| ROE | 94.8%↓21% | — | 94.4%↓17% | 114.0%↑33% | 86.0%↓22% | 109.9%↓2% | 111.8% |
| Total Debt | $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.5B↓23% | $3.2B↑35% | $2.4B | $2.4B↓9% | $2.6B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $1.5B↑53% | $1.5B↑53% | $1.4B↑30% | $1.0B↓9% | $1.1B↓1% | $1.2B↑38% | $838.0M |
| Current Ratio | 1.24↓5% | 1.24↓5% | 1.44↑14% | 1.26↑5% | 1.19↓12% | 1.35↓10% | 1.50 |
| Debt / Equity | 1.66↓35% | 1.66↓35% | 1.84↓41% | 3.11↑49% | 2.09↑1% | 2.06↓34% | 3.15 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.9B↑3% | $503.0M↓25% | $2.1B↑37% | $1.5B↓11% | $1.7B↑52% | $1.1B↓9% | $1.2B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.6B | $401.0M↓35% | $1.9B↑40% | $1.3B↓13% | $1.5B↑76% | $868.0M↓12% | $985.0M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Computers
NTAP vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc.AAPL | $5.18T | $356.27 | $416.2B | $112.0B | 151.9% | 1.23 | 32.0% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 4/11 |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.CSCO | $377.1B | $95.64 | $56.7B | $10.2B | 21.7% | 0.60 | 20.8% | 1.00 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 1/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| Palo Alto Networks IncPANW | $263.8B | $322.24 | $9.2B | $1.1B | 14.5% | 0.00 | 13.5% | 0.94 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPIBM | $233.6B | $247.13 | $67.5B | $10.6B | 32.4% | 1.88 | — | 0.96 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plcSTX | $121.3B | $528.29 | $12.2B | $3.2B | 146.9% | 1.65 | 33.6% | 1.67 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPWDC | $110.7B | $295.65 | $9.5B | $1.9B | 35.6% | 1.31 | 24.5% | 1.08 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 3 | 4/11 |
| Fortinet, Inc.FTNT | $93.5B | $127.22 | $6.8B | $1.9B | 149.8% | 0.81 | 30.7% | 1.17 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise CoHPE | $64.1B | $48.29 | $34.3B | $57.0M | 0.2% | 0.91 | -1.3% | 1.01 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |