OSHKOSH CORP
OSKAbout the company
Oshkosh Corporation provides purpose-built vehicles and equipment worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Access, Vocational, and Transport segment. The Access segment designs and manufactures aerial work platform and telehandlers for use in construction, industrial, and maintenance applications; and towing and recovery equipment, which includes carriers, wreckers, and rotators, as well as provides financing and leasing solutions, including rental fleet loans, leases, and floor plan and retail financing.
Investment snapshot
Positive
5
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
5 / 6
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$156.69
+10.5% vs price
Models with upside
4 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
9 of 12 pass — Lynch, Piotroski and Asness object
Key risk
14 of 16 flag OSK's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #753 (Top 24.3%) | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | PASS | BUY | BUY | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -6.4% | N/A | -20.8% | N/A | N/A | +22.9% | +9.5% | +52.3% | -118.6% | +46.5% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage75% pass✓ 12✗ 3▾
9 of 12 pass — Lynch, Piotroski and Asness object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $600.7M vs NCA $2.3B✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.24, IC: 9.5x✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.24✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-42.7M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change6.36% -> 10.92%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.72✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.24✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.24✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=9.5x, D/EBITDA=0.9x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.24✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.2419; #1826/4210 (top 43.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow70% pass✓ 9✗ 3▾
7 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai and Oshaughnessy object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$705.7M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$973.5M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$783.4M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.78%, ROA=6.42%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)11.3x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=7.1%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive17/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap11.0%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share14.4x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency24/24 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$973.5M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+11.26%; #635/4519 (top 14.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models57% pass✓ 4✗ 3▾
Models split on OSK at $141.78 — fair values range $64.85–$296.96
Buffett fair value$133.29✗Buffett-6.4% margin vs $141.78Greenblatt fair value$117.33✗Greenblatt-20.8% margin vs $141.78Munger fair value$183.90✓Munger+22.9% margin vs $141.78Pabrai fair value$156.69✓Pabrai+9.5% margin vs $141.78Akre fair value$296.96✓Akre+52.3% margin vs $141.78Marks fair value$64.85✗Marks-118.6% margin vs $141.78Ackman fair value$264.96✓Ackman+46.5% margin vs $141.78
Where It Falls Short
- Profitability13% pass✓ 11✗ 24▾
14 of 16 flag OSK's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Net income / market capitalization+5.77%; #1477/6340 (top 23.3%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive EPS (10 years)16/27 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)26/27 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)13.6%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)9.0% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$705.7M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR12.1%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE11.0%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value8.0%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=8.0%, ROC=21.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets6.42%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY7.23% -> 6.42% (delta: -0.81%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.78%, ROA=6.42%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY18.4% -> 17.5%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue5.9%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity11.0%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=2.0x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity15.6% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency26/27 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue6.8%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity11.0%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend8.7% (2023) -> 9.0% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 17.4% -> 17.5%, operating margin 8.7% -> 9.0%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingGross profit / total assets+16.15%; #2347/3702 (top 63.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+10.95%; #1669/5226 (top 31.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0190; #1384/5884 (top 23.5%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR12.1% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Valuation15% pass✓ 5✗ 23▾
11 of 13 flag OSK's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +8 more
Net income / market capitalization+5.77%; #1477/6340 (top 23.3%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio2.0x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value8.0%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=8.0%, ROC=21.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)11.3x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share2.0x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=8.0%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=7.1%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=2.0x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share14.4x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low169% of trailing low ($83.76)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.5265; #2789/6449 (top 43.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share3.78x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+73.2%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+1.2451; #1543/5247 (top 29.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+11.26%; #635/4519 (top 14.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-6.59%; #3225/6202 (top 52.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth38% pass✓ 7✗ 6▾
5 of 8 flag OSK's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +2 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR12.1%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -7.2% vs Rev: 4.2%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency26/27 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth11.1%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 17.4% -> 17.5%, operating margin 8.7% -> 9.0%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR8.7%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR12.1% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency38% pass✓ 5✗ 6▾
5 of 8 flag OSK's efficiency — Graham, Greenblatt, Piotroski +2 more
Current Ratio1.72✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)14.2%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+4.2%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)21.2%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.52 -> 1.94✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.14x -> 1.03x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.72✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital10.3%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=14.8%; FY2024: ROIC=15.6%; FY2025: ROIC=13.2%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC7.4% (RR=72% x ROIC=10.3%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)3/5 years above 12% (latest 13.2%)✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Verdicts42% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾
Split decision: 6 FAIL · 5 NEUTRAL · 3 PASS · 2 BUY
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✓BuffettPASS (5/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #753✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)•MungerNEUTRAL (3/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)•MarksNEUTRAL (4/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✓SleepBUY (6/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #447/2370 (Top 18.9%))•NeffNEUTRAL (4/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #252/963 (Top 26.2%))
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 3.1% of shares last year, 4.5% over two.
- Buybacks
- $278.0M
- Dividends
- $130.4M
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.6Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $9.0Best. | $7.4Best. | $6.9Best. | $6.2Best. | $7.2Best. |
| Revenue | $10.8B↑4% | $2.8B↑6% | $2.9B↑7% | $2.3B | $10.4B↓3% | $10.7B↑11% | $9.7B↑17% | $8.3B↑7% | $7.7B |
| Operating Income | $734.3M↓23% | $197.1M↓24% | $243.2M↓17% | $82.0M↓53% | $939.5M↓7% | $1.0B↑21% | $837.6M↑125% | $372.3M↓37% | $592.1M |
| Net Income | $498.5M↓25% | $138.4M↓29% | $183.2M↓11% | $43.1M↓62% | $647.0M↓5% | $681.4M↑14% | $598.0M↑244% | $173.9M↓66% | $508.9M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin | 15.4%↓14% | 15.5%↓11% | 16.5%↓14% | 13.5%↓22% | 17.5%↓5% | 18.4%↑5% | 17.4%↑37% | 12.7%↓22% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8%↓26% | 6.9%↓28% | 8.3%↓22% | 3.5%↓53% | 9.0%↓4% | 9.4%↑9% | 8.7%↑93% | 4.5%↓41% | 7.7% |
| ROE | 11.0%↓25% | — | — | — | 14.3%↓13% | 16.4%↑2% | 16.1%↑196% | 5.5%↓66% | 15.9% |
| Total Debt | $1.1B↓9% | $1.1B↓9% | $1.1B↓26% | $1.1B↓22% | $1.1B↑14% | $961.8M↑25% | $772.5M↑28% | $604.7M↓27% | $828.0M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $4.6B | $4.6B | $4.5B↑2% | $4.5B↑5% | $4.5B↑9% | $4.2B↑12% | $3.7B↑16% | $3.2B↓1% | $3.2B |
| Current Ratio | 1.72↓13% | 1.72↓13% | 1.72↓7% | 1.63↓7% | 1.94↑28% | 1.52↑5% | 1.45↓22% | 1.87↓7% | 2.00 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.24↓9% | 0.24↓9% | 0.24↓28% | 0.26↓26% | 0.24↑5% | 0.23↑11% | 0.21↑10% | 0.19↓27% | 0.26 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.1B↑16% | $319.9M↓35% | $374.3M↑320% | -$161.0M↑59% | $783.4M↑42% | $550.1M↓8% | $599.6M | $601.3M↓51% | $1.2B |
| Free Cash Flow | $973.5M↑25% | $274.7M↓41% | $347.6M↑615% | -$189.1M↑57% | $618.0M↑130% | $269.1M↓2% | $274.3M↓17% | $331.8M↓70% | $1.1B |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Automobiles and Trucks
OSK vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla, Inc.TSLA | $1.54T | $390.22 | $94.8B | $3.8B | 4.6% | 0.02 | 4.6% | 2.16 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| General Motors CoGM | $72.5B | $86.00 | $185.0B | $2.7B | 4.4% | 2.15 | 1.6% | 1.17 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| PACCAR INCPCAR | $56.2B | $106.66 | $28.4B | $2.4B | 12.3% | 0.00 | — | — | 3/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |
| FORD MOTOR COF | $47.6B | $11.91 | $187.3B | $8.2B | -22.7% | — | -4.9% | 1.07 | 2/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| HONDA MOTOR CO LTDHMC | $44.5B | $34.30 | $145.0B | $5.6B | 6.8% | 0.71 | 5.6% | 1.36 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INCMGA | $16.0B | $61.82 | $42.0B | $829.0M | 6.6% | 0.38 | — | 1.25 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| BORGWARNER INCBWA | $10.2B | $50.89 | $14.3B | $277.0M | 5.1% | 0.72 | 3.7% | 2.07 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| Aptiv PLCAPTV | $7.8B | $38.75 | $20.4B | $165.0M | 1.8% | 0.82 | 5.8% | 1.74 | 4/9 | 0/9 | 0/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |