PagerDuty, Inc.

PD
About the company

PagerDuty, Inc. engages in the operation of a digital operations management platform in the United States and internationally. The company collects data and digital signals from virtually any software-enabled system or device and leverages artificial intelligence and powerful machine learning to correlate, process, predict, and remediate incident.

Country: United StatesPrice: $15.95Market Cap: $1.3B

Investment snapshot

24%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

4

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 8

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$23.16

+45.2% vs price

Models with upside

4 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

6 of 10 pass — Piotroski, Dreman, Sleep +1 more object

Key risk

11 of 12 flag PD's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #1752 (Top 56.6%)NEUTRALPASSPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILPASSBUYFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-42.0%+37.8%N/AN/AN/A-1.3%+33.8%+54.9%N/AN/A+31.1%-1108.3%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 vs 2025-07-31 · TTM ended 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-12

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-12

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-12

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-12

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-07-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-27

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Cash Flow60% pass✓ 8✗ 4▾

    6 of 10 pass — Piotroski, Dreman, Sleep +1 more object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$183.6M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$126.6M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$114.9M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.60%, ROA=17.50%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)11.8x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=8.5x, FCF Yield=8.9%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive5/9 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap9.3%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share12.1x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency5/9 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$126.6M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+10.09%; #749/4519 (top 16.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models57% pass✓ 4✗ 3▾

    Models split on PD at $15.95 — fair values range $1.32–$35.40

    Graham fair value$11.23
    ✗Graham-42.0% margin vs $15.95
    Buffett fair value$25.64
    ✓Buffett+37.8% margin vs $15.95
    Dreman fair value$15.75
    ✗Dreman-1.3% margin vs $15.95
    Munger fair value$24.09
    ✓Munger+33.8% margin vs $15.95
    Pabrai fair value$35.40
    ✓Pabrai+54.9% margin vs $15.95
    Ackman fair value$23.16
    ✓Ackman+31.1% margin vs $15.95
    Templeton fair value$1.32
    ✗Templeton-1108.3% margin vs $15.95

Where It Falls Short

  • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

    11 of 12 flag PD's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $420.6M vs NCA $308.3M
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.71, IC: 3.8x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity1.71
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-183.2M
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change52.25% -> 42.46%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.02
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.71
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels1.71
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=3.8x, D/EBITDA=9.0x
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1.71
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.7112; #3685/4210 (top 87.5%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth13% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾

    7 of 8 flag PD's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 8.5x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency1/9 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth8.5%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 81.9% -> 84.9%, operating margin -22.3% -> 1.2%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR18.2%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Profitability19% pass✓ 15✗ 20▾

    13 of 16 flag PD's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)1/10 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)1/10 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-20.4%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)1.2% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$183.6M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 8.5x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE79.3%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value0.4%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=0.4%, ROC=5.8%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets17.50%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-4.61% -> 17.50% (delta: +22.11%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.60%, ROA=17.50%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY83.0% -> 84.9%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue8.5%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity79.3%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=8.5x, P/B=5.3x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-2.8% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-717.9% (IV=$1.95 vs Price=$15.95)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency1/9 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue6.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity79.3%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-22.3% (2023) -> 1.2% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 81.9% -> 84.9%, operating margin -22.3% -> 1.2%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+14.67%; #380/6340 (top 6.0%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+43.80%; #838/3702 (top 22.6%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+79.34%; #117/5226 (top 2.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1183; #3684/5884 (top 62.6%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years1/9 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Valuation23% pass✓ 10✗ 18▾

    10 of 13 flag PD's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS122.7x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio5.3x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B655.80
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 8.5x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value0.4%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=0.4%, ROC=5.8%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS8.5x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)11.8x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share5.3x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=8.5x, OE Yield=13.5%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=8.5x, FCF Yield=8.9%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=8.5x, P/B=5.3x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-717.9% (IV=$1.95 vs Price=$15.95)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share12.1x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low257% of trailing low ($6.21)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+14.67%; #380/6340 (top 6.0%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.1849; #4256/6449 (top 66.0%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS8.5x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share13.48x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change-32.4%
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.3944; #2938/5247 (top 56.0%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+10.09%; #749/4519 (top 16.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+139.85%; #225/6202 (top 3.6%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    6 of 8 flag PD's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

    Current Ratio2.02
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-24.9%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-34.9%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)5.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.93 -> 2.01
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.50x -> 0.50x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.02
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital4.0%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-12.3%; FY2024: ROIC=-8.1%; FY2025: ROIC=0.7%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC0.7% (RR=100% x ROIC=0.7%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 0.7%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Verdicts31% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾

    Split decision: 8 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 3 PASS · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✗GreenblattRank #1752•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #279/2370 (Top 11.8%))✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Business Services
Size: Small Cap($1.3B)
Revenue: $492.5M+5.4% YoY
Net Income: $173.4M+505.7% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin1.2%
Return on Equity68.4%
Debt / Equity1.56
Current Ratio2.01
EPS (Diluted)$1.87
Buybacks (1y)$134.9M
Buybacks (2y)$235.0M
Shares Retired6.7% / 8.4% 2y

Similar Companies

ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
$122.3B
EAELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
$52.9B
RBRKRubrik, Inc.
$22.6B
ACMAECOM
$9.1B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 6.7% of shares last year, 8.4% over two.

Buybacks
$134.9M
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-07-31

2025-08-01 – 2026-07-31

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense.

Q2 FY 2027

2026-05-01 – 2026-07-31

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2027

2026-02-01 – 2026-04-30

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-12
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-03-17
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-03-17
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-03-16
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-17
Market Cap$1.3Bcurrent----$900.8Mest.$1.7Best.$2.2Best.$2.7Best.$2.9Best.
Revenue$494.7M↑2%$124.4M↑1%$121.0M↑1%$492.5M↑5%$467.5M↑9%$430.7M↑16%$370.8M↑32%$281.4M
Operating Income$32.0M↑211%$10.2M↑187%$9.2M↑189%$5.8M↑110%-$59.8M↑38%-$96.2M↑26%-$129.4M↓27%-$101.7M
Net Income$184.0M↑1600%$7.8M↓19%$5.3M↑174%$173.4M↑506%-$42.7M↑43%-$75.2M↑41%-$128.4M↓20%-$107.5M
EPS (Diluted)--$0.06↓40%$0.13↑286%$1.87↑417%$-0.59↑34%$-0.89↑39%$-1.45↓14%$-1.27
Gross Margin84.8%↑1%83.9%↓1%84.3%84.9%↑2%83.0%↑1%81.9%↑1%81.0%↓2%82.8%
Operating Margin6.5%↑209%8.2%↑185%7.6%↑188%1.2%↑109%-12.8%↑43%-22.3%↑36%-34.9%↑3%-36.1%
ROE79.3%↑1268%——68.4%↑308%-32.9%↑25%-43.8%↑18%-53.3%↓32%-40.2%
Total Debt$396.9M↑1%$396.9M↑1%$396.3M↓12%$395.7M↓12%$450.7M↑1%$448.0M↑51%$296.5M↓1%$300.1M
Shareholders' Equity$232.0M↑28%$232.0M↑28%$216.5M↑49%$253.6M↑95%$129.8M↓24%$171.6M↓29%$241.0M↓10%$267.0M
Current Ratio2.02↓16%2.02↓16%1.95↓3%2.01↑4%1.93↓23%2.50↑13%2.21↓22%2.84
Debt / Equity1.71↓22%1.71↓22%1.83↓41%1.56↓55%3.47↑33%2.61↑112%1.23↑9%1.12
Operating Cash Flow$131.4M↑11%$36.9M↑9%$44.3M↑44%$114.9M↓3%$117.9M↑64%$72.0M↑324%$17.0M↑382%-$6.0M
Free Cash Flow$126.6M↑10%$34.7M↑5%$43.3M↑43%$111.9M↓3%$115.1M↑65%$69.8M↑466%$12.3M↑230%-$9.5M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Business Services

PD vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$492.5MBottom 25%
Net Income$173.4MMedian
ROE68.4%Top 25%
D/E1.56Bottom 25%
Op. Margin1.2%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio2.01Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP$122.3B$309.93$21.9B$4.4B73.2%0.8224.2%1.054/95/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA$52.9B$209.70$7.5B$887.0M13.1%0.2215.4%1.051/94/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
Rubrik, Inc.RBRK$22.6B$109.88$1.3B$348.8M67.1%—-26.2%1.691/90/92/70/3F-Score 62/11
AECOMACM$9.1B$70.50$16.1B$561.8M22.5%1.096.4%1.141/93/93/71/3F-Score 82/11
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT$6.2B$152.07$1.2B$70.7M942.8%—6.3%1.951/92/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
WPP plcWPP$6.0B$27.79$18.2B$289.5M-8.5%1.942.8%0.891/92/91/70/3F-Score 32/11
VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS$5.6B$48.94$623.5M$129.3M-21.6%0.76-23.5%1.971/90/91/70/3F-Score 51/11
ROBERT HALF INC.RHI$4.3B$42.00$5.4B$133.0M10.4%—1.4%1.532/95/91/70/3F-Score 52/11