PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp
PRCTAbout the company
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation, a surgical robotics company, develops transformative solutions in urology in the United States and internationally. It develops, manufactures, and sells AquaBeam Robotic System, an image-guided, surgical robotic system for use in minimally invasive urologic surgery focusing on treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
1 / 14
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
—
No comparable estimates
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object
Key risk
No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #2431 (Top 78.5%) | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-26 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-04 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $51.8M vs NCA $343.8M✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.16, IC: -34.7x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.16✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$166.6M✓LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change9.64% -> 10.16%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities5.89✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.16✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.16✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-34.7x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.16✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1574; #1529/4210 (top 36.3%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Profitability0% pass✓ 5✗ 30▾
No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion
Positive EPS (10 years)0/7 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/7 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-30.6%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-33.7% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-95.6M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-34.9%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-9.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-9.8%, ROC=-76.1%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-18.81%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-17.12% -> -18.81% (delta: -1.69%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-9.64%, ROA=-18.81%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY61.1% -> 63.7%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-31.0%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-34.9%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=3.7x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-28.9% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/6 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-33.6%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-34.9%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-80.2% (2023) -> -33.7% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 52.2% -> 63.7%, operating margin -80.2% -> -33.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-8.39%; #4095/6340 (top 64.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+48.08%; #710/3702 (top 19.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-34.92%; #3992/5226 (top 76.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0462; #2478/5884 (top 42.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years0/6 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Valuation0% pass✗ 28▾
All 13 investors flag PRCT's valuation
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio3.7x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-9.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-9.8%, ROC=-76.1%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share3.7x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-7.3%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-4.3%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=3.7x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low129% of trailing low ($18.51)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-8.39%; #4095/6340 (top 64.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.2402; #3976/6449 (top 61.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share3.67x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.2573; #3520/5247 (top 67.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-6.21%; #3051/4519 (top 67.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-1.00%; #2857/6202 (top 46.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-95.6M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-85.1M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-49.0M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-9.64%, ROA=-18.81%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-4.3%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive0/6 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-6.3%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/6 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-85.1M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-6.21%; #3051/4519 (top 67.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Verdicts6% pass✓ 1✗ 15▾
Split decision: 14 FAIL · 1 PASS · 1 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #2431✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1814/2370 (Top 76.5%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
7 of 8 flag PRCT's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 22.0% vs Rev: 17.5%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-14.47 (2020) -> $-1.72 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/6 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth64.8%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 52.2% -> 63.7%, operating margin -80.2% -> -33.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR109.0%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag PRCT's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio5.89✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-163.5%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-173.5%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-76.1%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY9.07 -> 6.85✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.42x -> 0.61x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities5.89✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital-24.6%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-26.0%; FY2024: ROIC=-16.8%; FY2025: ROIC=-19.7%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -19.7%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 2.9% of shares last year, 10.6% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.4Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $1.6Best. | $4.0Best. | $2.4Best. | $1.7Best. | $305.5Mest. |
| Revenue | $352.3M↑17% | $98.3M↑18% | $94.5M↑19% | $83.1M↑20% | $308.1M↑37% | $224.5M↑65% | $136.2M↑82% | $75.0M↑118% | $34.5M |
| Operating Income | -$118.4M↓28% | -$27.4M↓18% | -$27.4M↓23% | -$32.6M↓19% | -$103.9M↓7% | -$96.6M↑12% | -$109.2M↓35% | -$80.7M↓49% | -$54.2M |
| Net Income | -$114.9M↓36% | -$26.5M↓24% | -$26.9M↓37% | -$31.6M↓28% | -$95.6M↓5% | -$91.4M↑14% | -$105.9M↓22% | -$87.2M↓46% | -$59.9M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.46↓21% | $-0.47↓34% | $-0.56↓24% | $-1.72↑2% | $-1.75↑22% | $-2.24↓14% | $-1.96↑46% | $-3.63 |
| Gross Margin | 64.7% | 66.3%↑2% | 66.0%↑1% | 64.9%↑2% | 63.7%↑4% | 61.1%↑17% | 52.2%↑6% | 49.4%↑7% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | -33.6%↓9% | -27.9% | -29.0%↓3% | -39.2%↑1% | -33.7%↑22% | -43.0%↑46% | -80.2%↑26% | -107.6%↑32% | -157.1% |
| ROE | -34.9%↓57% | — | — | — | -26.1%↓15% | -22.7%↑40% | -37.7%↑15% | -44.2%↓97% | -22.4% |
| Total Debt | $51.8M | $51.8M | $51.7M | $51.7M | $51.6M | $51.5M | $51.3M | $51.2M↑2% | $50.0M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $328.9M↓14% | $328.9M↓14% | $340.1M↓12% | $347.7M↓11% | $365.9M↓9% | $402.2M↑43% | $280.8M↑42% | $197.1M↓26% | $267.1M |
| Current Ratio | 5.89↓30% | 5.89↓30% | 6.55↓29% | 6.73↓25% | 6.85↓25% | 9.07↑19% | 7.63↓1% | 7.73↓62% | 20.08 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.16↑16% | 0.16↑16% | 0.15↑14% | 0.15↑12% | 0.14↑10% | 0.13↓30% | 0.18↓30% | 0.26↑39% | 0.19 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$76.7M↓8% | -$9.0M↓35% | -$19.3M↓28% | -$38.1M↓125% | -$49.0M↑51% | -$99.2M↑8% | -$108.0M↓34% | -$80.4M↓40% | -$57.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$85.1M↓7% | -$9.7M↓2% | -$22.2M↓24% | -$41.0M↓118% | -$58.3M↑44% | -$103.6M↑22% | -$133.2M↓60% | -$83.0M↓43% | -$57.9M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Medical Equipment
PRCT vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALCON INCALC | $35.6B | $74.12 | $10.4B | $980.0M | 4.4% | 0.21 | 13.1% | 2.12 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NVPHG | $29.7B | $30.34 | $21.0B | $1.1B | 8.2% | 0.64 | 8.0% | 1.32 | 1/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INCWST | $29.0B | $416.42 | $3.1B | $493.7M | 15.5% | 0.06 | 19.0% | 3.02 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 6/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| SMITH & NEPHEW PLCSNN | $13.1B | $31.28 | $6.2B | $625.0M | 11.8% | 0.59 | 12.9% | 2.57 | 2/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| MSA Safety IncMSA | $6.7B | $174.17 | $1.9B | $278.9M | 20.4% | 0.42 | 19.8% | 3.01 | 5/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 7/11 |
| STAAR SURGICAL COSTAA | $1.3B | $26.39 | $239.4M | $80.4M | -23.4% | — | -38.3% | 4.55 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 3/11 |
| ARTIVION, INC.AORT | $931.9M | $19.10 | $441.3M | $9.8M | 2.2% | 0.48 | 7.6% | 3.53 | 2/9 | 0/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 1/11 |
| InMode Ltd.INMD | $763.6M | $13.27 | $370.5M | $93.8M | 13.7% | — | 23.0% | 9.88 | 5/9 | 3/9 | 0/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |