Profound Medical Corp.
PROFAbout the company
Profound Medical Corp. operates as a commercial-stage medical device company that develops and markets AI-powered, MRI-guided, incision-free therapeutic systems for the image guided ablation of diseased tissue. The company's lead product TULSA-PRO system combines magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), robotically driven transurethral sweeping action/thermal ultrasound and closed-loop temperature feedback control to ablate whole gland or physician defined region of malignant or benign prostate tissue.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 11
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$7.62
+2.7% vs price
Models with upside
3 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object
Key risk
9 of 10 flag PROF's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +6 more
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #2719 (Top 87.8%) | PASS | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Margin of Safety | +2.6% | N/A | -115.7% | N/A | N/A | +61.7% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +63.8% | N/A | -27.7% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $4.5M vs NCA $42.8M✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.11, IC: -105.8x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.11✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$28.8M✓LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change4.16% -> 5.81%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities4.54✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.11✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.11✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-104.7x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.11✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1061; #1313/4210 (top 31.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models60% pass✓ 3✗ 2▾
Models split on PROF at $7.42 — fair values range $3.44–$20.47
Graham fair value$7.62✓Graham+2.6% margin vs $7.42Lynch fair value$3.44✗Lynch-115.7% margin vs $7.42Dreman fair value$19.35✓Dreman+61.7% margin vs $7.42Marks fair value$20.47✓Marks+63.8% margin vs $7.42Templeton fair value$5.81✗Templeton-27.7% margin vs $7.42
Where It Falls Short
- Cash Flow10% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
9 of 10 flag PROF's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +6 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-28.9M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-38.4M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-38.2M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.32%, ROA=-54.95%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=5.3x, FCF Yield=-14.1%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive0/2 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-14.3%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/8 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-38.4M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-14.12%; #3371/4519 (top 74.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth13% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾
7 of 8 flag PROF's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-11.5%✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)2.16✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR2.4%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 42.0% vs Rev: 50.7%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$1.55 (2018) -> $1.41 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR-1.3% CAGR over 7 years✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/8 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth48.4%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR2.4% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 59.9% -> 70.8%, operating margin -398.0% -> -256.3%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR17.1%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR2.4% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾
Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #2719✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1937/2370 (Top 81.7%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability19% pass✓ 10✗ 25▾
13 of 16 flag PROF's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more
Positive EPS (10 years)8/9 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-11.5%✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/9 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-58.7%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-256.3% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-28.9M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.09✓BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)2.16✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR2.4%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-76.4%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-14.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-14.1%, ROC=-347.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-54.95%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-39.60% -> -54.95% (delta: -15.34%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.32%, ROA=-54.95%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY65.9% -> 70.8%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-137.1%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-76.4%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=5.3x, P/B=4.1x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-66.9% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value61.7% (IV=$19.35 vs Price=$7.42)✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/8 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-145.1%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-76.4%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR2.4% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-398.0% (2023) -> -256.3% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 59.9% -> 70.8%, operating margin -398.0% -> -256.3%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-11.95%; #4262/6340 (top 67.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+30.01%; #1431/3702 (top 38.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-76.42%; #4451/5226 (top 85.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1058; #3545/5884 (top 60.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR2.4% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years8/8 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Valuation23% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾
10 of 13 flag PROF's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS5.8x✓Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio4.1x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B23.30✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)2.16✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-14.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-14.1%, ROC=-347.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS5.3x✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share4.1x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=5.3x✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=5.3x, FCF Yield=-14.1%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=5.3x, P/B=4.1x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value61.7% (IV=$19.35 vs Price=$7.42)✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low166% of trailing low ($4.47)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-11.95%; #4262/6340 (top 67.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1564; #4429/6449 (top 68.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS5.3x✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share4.06x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.0869; #4403/5247 (top 83.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-14.12%; #3371/4519 (top 74.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+10.75%; #1819/6202 (top 29.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾
5 of 8 flag PROF's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Munger +2 more
Current Ratio4.54✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-217.4%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-227.4%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-347.9%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY10.52 -> 12.52✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.15x -> 0.21x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities4.54✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital-57.6%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-59.1%; FY2024: ROIC=-40.1%; FY2025: ROIC=-45.9%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -45.9%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 20.8% of shares last year.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $271.8Mcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $272.2Mest. | $193.8Mest. | $190.5Mest. | $257.9Mest. | $205.7Mest. |
| Revenue | $23.6M | $9.8M↑86% | $2.5M↑12% | $5.3M↑104% | $16.1M↑51% | $10.7M↑48% | $7.2M↑8% | $6.7M↓3% | $6.9M |
| Operating Income | -$34.3M | -$7.8M↑12% | -$11.1M↑20% | -$8.0M↑28% | -$41.3M↓25% | -$33.1M↓15% | -$28.7M↑11% | -$32.1M↓6% | -$30.3M |
| Net Income | -$32.5M | -$7.7M↑3% | -$9.5M↑39% | -$7.1M↑34% | -$42.6M↓53% | -$27.8M↑2% | -$28.3M↑1% | -$28.7M↑7% | -$30.7M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.21↓181% | $-0.26↓150% | $0.19↓47% | $1.41↑26% | $1.12↓16% | $1.34↓3% | $1.38↓8% | $1.50 |
| Gross Margin | 73.9% | 78.1%↑5% | 78.4%↑7% | 71.8%↑2% | 70.8%↑7% | 65.9%↑10% | 59.9%↑32% | 45.2%↑5% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | -145.1% | -79.6%↑53% | -445.7%↑29% | -150.3%↑65% | -256.3%↑17% | -309.6%↑22% | -398.0%↑17% | -480.9%↓9% | -440.7% |
| ROE | -76.4% | — | — | — | -64.1%↓39% | -46.0%↑49% | -90.7%↓66% | -54.5%↓43% | -38.1% |
| Total Debt | $4.5M | $4.5M↑1% | $4.5M↑1% | $4.5M | $4.5M↓3% | $4.7M↓34% | $7.1M↓1% | $7.2M↑421% | $1.4M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $42.5M | $42.5M↑32% | $49.8M↑27% | $59.4M↑17% | $66.4M↑10% | $60.4M↑94% | $31.2M↓41% | $52.6M↓35% | $80.6M |
| Current Ratio | 4.54 | 4.54↑9% | 6.46↓24% | 6.56↓42% | 12.52↑19% | 10.52↑60% | 6.58↓56% | 14.82↓20% | 18.56 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11↓24% | 0.09↓20% | 0.08↓14% | 0.07↓12% | 0.08↓66% | 0.23↑67% | 0.14↑699% | 0.02 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$31.5M | -$5.0M↑48% | -$11.3M↑18% | -$8.6M↓4% | -$38.2M↓63% | -$23.5M↓4% | -$22.6M↑12% | -$25.8M↓15% | -$22.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -- | -$38.4M | -- | -- | -- | -$22.4M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Medical Equipment
PROF vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALCON INCALC | $35.6B | $74.12 | $10.4B | $980.0M | 4.4% | 0.21 | 13.1% | 2.12 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NVPHG | $29.7B | $30.34 | $21.0B | $1.1B | 8.2% | 0.64 | 8.0% | 1.32 | 1/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INCWST | $29.0B | $416.42 | $3.1B | $493.7M | 15.5% | 0.06 | 19.0% | 3.02 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 6/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| SMITH & NEPHEW PLCSNN | $13.1B | $31.28 | $6.2B | $625.0M | 11.8% | 0.59 | 12.9% | 2.57 | 2/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| MSA Safety IncMSA | $6.7B | $174.17 | $1.9B | $278.9M | 20.4% | 0.42 | 19.8% | 3.01 | 5/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 7/11 |
| STAAR SURGICAL COSTAA | $1.3B | $26.39 | $239.4M | $80.4M | -23.4% | — | -38.3% | 4.55 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 3/11 |
| ARTIVION, INC.AORT | $931.9M | $19.10 | $441.3M | $9.8M | 2.2% | 0.48 | 7.6% | 3.53 | 2/9 | 0/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 1/11 |
| InMode Ltd.INMD | $763.6M | $13.27 | $370.5M | $93.8M | 13.7% | — | 23.0% | 9.88 | 5/9 | 3/9 | 0/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |