Profound Medical Corp.

PROF
About the company

Profound Medical Corp. operates as a commercial-stage medical device company that develops and markets AI-powered, MRI-guided, incision-free therapeutic systems for the image guided ablation of diseased tissue. The company's lead product TULSA-PRO system combines magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), robotically driven transurethral sweeping action/thermal ultrasound and closed-loop temperature feedback control to ablate whole gland or physician defined region of malignant or benign prostate tissue.

Country: CanadaPrice: $7.42Market Cap: $271.8M

Investment snapshot

12%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

2

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 11

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$7.62

+2.7% vs price

Models with upside

3 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object

Key risk

9 of 10 flag PROF's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +6 more

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2719 (Top 87.8%)PASSFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+2.6%N/A-115.7%N/AN/A+61.7%N/AN/AN/A+63.8%N/A-27.7%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾

    8 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Marks +1 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $4.5M vs NCA $42.8M
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.11, IC: -105.8x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.11
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$28.8M
    ✓LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change4.16% -> 5.81%
    ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.54
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.11
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.11
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-104.7x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.11
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1061; #1313/4210 (top 31.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models60% pass✓ 3✗ 2▾

    Models split on PROF at $7.42 — fair values range $3.44–$20.47

    Graham fair value$7.62
    ✓Graham+2.6% margin vs $7.42
    Lynch fair value$3.44
    ✗Lynch-115.7% margin vs $7.42
    Dreman fair value$19.35
    ✓Dreman+61.7% margin vs $7.42
    Marks fair value$20.47
    ✓Marks+63.8% margin vs $7.42
    Templeton fair value$5.81
    ✗Templeton-27.7% margin vs $7.42

Where It Falls Short

  • Cash Flow10% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾

    9 of 10 flag PROF's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +6 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-28.9M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-38.4M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-38.2M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.32%, ROA=-54.95%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=5.3x, FCF Yield=-14.1%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive0/2 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-14.3%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/8 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-38.4M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-14.12%; #3371/4519 (top 74.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth13% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾

    7 of 8 flag PROF's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-11.5%
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)2.16
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR2.4%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 42.0% vs Rev: 50.7%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$1.55 (2018) -> $1.41 (2025)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR-1.3% CAGR over 7 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency0/8 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth48.4%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR2.4% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 59.9% -> 70.8%, operating margin -398.0% -> -256.3%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR17.1%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR2.4% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾

    Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #2719✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1937/2370 (Top 81.7%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Profitability19% pass✓ 10✗ 25▾

    13 of 16 flag PROF's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)8/9 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-11.5%
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/9 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-58.7%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-256.3% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-28.9M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.09
    ✓BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)2.16
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR2.4%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-76.4%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-14.1%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-14.1%, ROC=-347.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-54.95%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-39.60% -> -54.95% (delta: -15.34%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.32%, ROA=-54.95%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY65.9% -> 70.8%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-137.1%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-76.4%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=5.3x, P/B=4.1x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-66.9% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value61.7% (IV=$19.35 vs Price=$7.42)
    ✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency0/8 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-145.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-76.4%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR2.4% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-398.0% (2023) -> -256.3% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 59.9% -> 70.8%, operating margin -398.0% -> -256.3%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-11.95%; #4262/6340 (top 67.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+30.01%; #1431/3702 (top 38.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-76.42%; #4451/5226 (top 85.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1058; #3545/5884 (top 60.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR2.4% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years8/8 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Valuation23% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾

    10 of 13 flag PROF's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS5.8x
    ✓Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio4.1x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B23.30
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)2.16
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-14.1%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-14.1%, ROC=-347.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS5.3x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share4.1x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=5.3x
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=5.3x, FCF Yield=-14.1%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=5.3x, P/B=4.1x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value61.7% (IV=$19.35 vs Price=$7.42)
    ✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low166% of trailing low ($4.47)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-11.95%; #4262/6340 (top 67.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.1564; #4429/6449 (top 68.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS5.3x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share4.06x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.0869; #4403/5247 (top 83.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-14.12%; #3371/4519 (top 74.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+10.75%; #1819/6202 (top 29.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾

    5 of 8 flag PROF's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Munger +2 more

    Current Ratio4.54
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-217.4%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-227.4%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-347.9%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY10.52 -> 12.52
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.15x -> 0.21x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.54
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital-57.6%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-59.1%; FY2024: ROIC=-40.1%; FY2025: ROIC=-45.9%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -45.9%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Medical Equipment
SIC Sector: Measuring & Medical Instruments
Size: Micro Cap($271.8M)
Revenue: $16.1M+50.7% YoY
Net Income: $42.6M-53.0% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-256.3%
Return on Equity-64.1%
Debt / Equity0.07
Current Ratio12.52
EPS (Diluted)$1.41
Shares Retired−20.8%

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 20.8% of shares last year.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-05
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-03-07
FY 2023
Sources
  • 40-F · 2024-03-07
FY 2022
Sources
  • 40-F · 2023-03-07
FY 2021
Sources
  • 40-F · 2022-03-03
Market Cap$271.8Mcurrent------$272.2Mest.$193.8Mest.$190.5Mest.$257.9Mest.$205.7Mest.
Revenue$23.6M$9.8M↑86%$2.5M↑12%$5.3M↑104%$16.1M↑51%$10.7M↑48%$7.2M↑8%$6.7M↓3%$6.9M
Operating Income-$34.3M-$7.8M↑12%-$11.1M↑20%-$8.0M↑28%-$41.3M↓25%-$33.1M↓15%-$28.7M↑11%-$32.1M↓6%-$30.3M
Net Income-$32.5M-$7.7M↑3%-$9.5M↑39%-$7.1M↑34%-$42.6M↓53%-$27.8M↑2%-$28.3M↑1%-$28.7M↑7%-$30.7M
EPS (Diluted)--$-0.21↓181%$-0.26↓150%$0.19↓47%$1.41↑26%$1.12↓16%$1.34↓3%$1.38↓8%$1.50
Gross Margin73.9%78.1%↑5%78.4%↑7%71.8%↑2%70.8%↑7%65.9%↑10%59.9%↑32%45.2%↑5%43.0%
Operating Margin-145.1%-79.6%↑53%-445.7%↑29%-150.3%↑65%-256.3%↑17%-309.6%↑22%-398.0%↑17%-480.9%↓9%-440.7%
ROE-76.4%———-64.1%↓39%-46.0%↑49%-90.7%↓66%-54.5%↓43%-38.1%
Total Debt$4.5M$4.5M↑1%$4.5M↑1%$4.5M$4.5M↓3%$4.7M↓34%$7.1M↓1%$7.2M↑421%$1.4M
Shareholders' Equity$42.5M$42.5M↑32%$49.8M↑27%$59.4M↑17%$66.4M↑10%$60.4M↑94%$31.2M↓41%$52.6M↓35%$80.6M
Current Ratio4.544.54↑9%6.46↓24%6.56↓42%12.52↑19%10.52↑60%6.58↓56%14.82↓20%18.56
Debt / Equity0.110.11↓24%0.09↓20%0.08↓14%0.07↓12%0.08↓66%0.23↑67%0.14↑699%0.02
Operating Cash Flow-$31.5M-$5.0M↑48%-$11.3M↑18%-$8.6M↓4%-$38.2M↓63%-$23.5M↓4%-$22.6M↑12%-$25.8M↓15%-$22.4M
Free Cash Flow---------$38.4M-------$22.4M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Medical Equipment

PROF vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$16.1MBottom 25%
Net Income$42.6MBottom 25%
ROE-64.1%Bottom 25%
D/E0.07Top 25%
Op. Margin-256.3%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio12.52Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
ALCON INCALC$35.6B$74.12$10.4B$980.0M4.4%0.2113.1%2.122/91/93/70/3F-Score 64/11
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NVPHG$29.7B$30.34$21.0B$1.1B8.2%0.648.0%1.321/91/91/70/3F-Score 53/11
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INCWST$29.0B$416.42$3.1B$493.7M15.5%0.0619.0%3.024/96/96/71/3F-Score 75/11
SMITH & NEPHEW PLCSNN$13.1B$31.28$6.2B$625.0M11.8%0.5912.9%2.572/90/91/70/3F-Score 64/11
MSA Safety IncMSA$6.7B$174.17$1.9B$278.9M20.4%0.4219.8%3.015/95/94/71/3F-Score 57/11
STAAR SURGICAL COSTAA$1.3B$26.39$239.4M$80.4M-23.4%—-38.3%4.552/92/92/70/3F-Score 33/11
ARTIVION, INC.AORT$931.9M$19.10$441.3M$9.8M2.2%0.487.6%3.532/90/90/70/3F-Score 71/11
InMode Ltd.INMD$763.6M$13.27$370.5M$93.8M13.7%—23.0%9.885/93/90/73/3F-Score 44/11