Q2 Holdings, Inc.
QTWOAbout the company
Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides digital solutions to financial institutions, financial technology companies, FinTechs, and alternative finance companies (Alt-FIs) in the United States. The company offers Digital Banking Platform, an end-to-end digital banking platform that supports its financial institution customers in their delivery of retail, SMB, and commercial functionalities across digital channels; and risk and fraud solutions that are designed to support financial institutions' efforts to protect end users, comply with regulatory requirements and manage fraud risk efficiently.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$24.76
-66.5% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +1 more object
Key risk
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | BUY | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Margin of Safety | -435.1% | -295.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -30.1% | -198.7% | N/A | N/A | +14.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-28 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.46, IC: 14.2x✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.01✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=14.2x, D/EBITDA=3.3x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0000; #1/4210 (top 0.0%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow60% pass✓ 8✗ 4▾
6 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Marks +1 more object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$98.6M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$233.0M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$201.5M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=15.79%, ROA=4.07%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)22.9x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=92.4x, FCF Yield=4.3%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive5/14 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap5.0%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share23.7x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency10/14 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$233.0M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.10%; #1562/4519 (top 34.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Efficiency0% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion
Current Ratio1.01✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-5.3%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-15.3%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.40 -> 1.02✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.54x -> 0.62x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.01✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital13.0%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-7.2%; FY2024: ROIC=-3.3%; FY2025: ROIC=3.3%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC3.3% (RR=100% x ROIC=3.3%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 3.3%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Valuation8% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾
12 of 13 flag QTWO's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio7.0x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 92.4x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value0.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=0.9%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS92.4x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)22.9x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share7.0x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=92.4x, OE Yield=2.1%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=92.4x, FCF Yield=4.3%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=92.4x, P/B=7.0x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share23.7x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low161% of trailing low ($45.87)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+2.41%; #2583/6340 (top 40.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1440; #4509/6449 (top 69.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS92.4x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share65.40x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-8.3%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.1905; #3825/5247 (top 72.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.10%; #1562/4519 (top 34.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+61.22%; #547/6202 (top 8.8%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Profitability13% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾
14 of 16 flag QTWO's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/15 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/15 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-12.0%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)5.0% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$98.6M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 92.4x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE16.7%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value0.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=0.9%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets4.07%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-2.98% -> 4.07% (delta: +7.05%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=15.79%, ROA=4.07%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY50.9% -> 54.1%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue13.4%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity16.7%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=92.4x, P/B=7.0x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-4.7% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/14 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue12.4%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity16.7%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-13.8% (2023) -> 5.0% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 48.5% -> 54.1%, operating margin -13.8% -> 5.0%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+2.41%; #2583/6340 (top 40.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+50.62%; #658/3702 (top 17.8%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+16.75%; #1010/5226 (top 19.3%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0452; #2441/5884 (top 41.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Growth13% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾
7 of 8 flag QTWO's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 92.4x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/14 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth11.5%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency5/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 48.5% -> 54.1%, operating margin -13.8% -> 5.0%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR14.6%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)•GreenblattNot ranked•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✓AckmanBUY (8/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #949/2370 (Top 40.0%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Valuation models20% pass✓ 1✗ 4▾
Models split on QTWO at $73.95 — fair values range $13.82–$86.19
Graham fair value$13.82✗Graham-435.1% margin vs $73.95Buffett fair value$18.68✗Buffett-295.9% margin vs $73.95Munger fair value$56.82✗Munger-30.1% margin vs $73.95Pabrai fair value$24.76✗Pabrai-198.7% margin vs $73.95Ackman fair value$86.19✓Ackman+14.2% margin vs $73.95
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 2.8% of shares last year, 5.6% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $5.0M
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.6Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $3.8Best. | $5.8Best. | $2.5Best. | $1.9Best. | $3.7Best. |
| Revenue | $870.3M↑13% | $225.8M↑12% | $219.8M↑13% | $216.5M↑14% | $794.8M↑14% | $696.5M↑12% | $624.6M↑10% | $565.7M↑13% | $498.7M |
| Operating Income | $107.9M↑403% | $34.0M↑209% | $29.3M↑198% | $27.7M↑1165% | $39.9M↑194% | -$42.3M↑51% | -$86.1M↑18% | -$104.8M↓34% | -$78.0M |
| Net Income | $110.2M↑247% | $33.2M↑121% | $29.9M↑154% | $26.6M↑460% | $52.0M↑235% | -$38.5M↑41% | -$65.4M↑40% | -$109.0M↑3% | -$112.7M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.52↑126% | $0.46↑156% | $0.40↑471% | $0.80↑225% | $-0.64↑43% | $-1.12↑41% | $-1.90↑5% | $-2.00 |
| Gross Margin | 58.4%↑9% | 59.7%↑11% | 59.2%↑11% | 59.1%↑11% | 54.1%↑6% | 50.9%↑5% | 48.5%↑7% | 45.3% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4%↑344% | 15.0%↑176% | 13.4%↑165% | 12.8%↑1009% | 5.0%↑183% | -6.1%↑56% | -13.8%↑26% | -18.5%↓18% | -15.6% |
| ROE | 16.7%↑229% | — | — | — | 7.9%↑206% | -7.4%↑49% | -14.6%↑44% | -26.0%↓32% | -19.8% |
| Total Debt | $0↓100% | $0↓100% | $0↓100% | $303.7M↓38% | $303.4M↓38% | $492.4M | $490.5M↓27% | $668.7M↑21% | $551.6M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $657.8M↑6% | $657.8M↑6% | $643.5M↑10% | $611.7M↑12% | $661.8M↑28% | $517.8M↑15% | $448.5M↑7% | $419.0M↓27% | $570.3M |
| Current Ratio | 1.01↑5% | 1.01↑5% | 0.94↑5% | 0.93↓35% | 1.02↓27% | 1.40↓37% | 2.23↓19% | 2.77↓11% | 3.10 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00↓100% | 0.00↓100% | 0.00↓100% | 0.50↓45% | 0.46↓52% | 0.95↓13% | 1.09↓31% | 1.60↑65% | 0.97 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $245.4M↑36% | $64.7M↑42% | $60.7M↑25% | $56.3M↑29% | $201.5M↑48% | $135.8M↑93% | $70.3M↑92% | $36.6M↑18% | $31.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | $233.0M↑33% | $62.6M↑46% | $59.0M↑25% | $49.7M↑16% | $194.7M↑51% | $129.1M↑100% | $64.6M↑154% | $25.4M↑124% | $11.3M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
QTWO vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |