Sezzle Inc.

SEZL
About the company

Sezzle Inc. operates as a technology-enabled payments company in the United States and Canada.

Country: United StatesPrice: $154.60Market Cap: $5.2B

Investment snapshot

24%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

4

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 8

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$55.84

-63.9% vs price

Models with upside

1 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

6 of 8 pass — Buffett and Greenblatt object

Key risk

12 of 13 flag SEZL's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILNot rankedNEUTRALPASSNEUTRALFAILBUYFAILBUYFAILBUYNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-653.8%-230.4%N/A-605.6%N/AN/A-37.1%-138.2%N/AN/A+30.3%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Efficiency75% pass✓ 8✗ 3▾

    6 of 8 pass — Buffett and Greenblatt object

    Current Ratio4.21
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-102.2%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-112.2%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY2.44 -> 3.92
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.91x -> 1.13x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.21
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital50.6%
    ✓Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=15.1%; FY2024: ROIC=33.9%; FY2025: ROIC=45.1%
    ✓AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC45.1% (RR=100% x ROIC=45.1%)
    ✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)3/5 years above 12% (latest 45.1%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 10✗ 5▾

    8 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Akre +1 more object

    Debt Levels0.37
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.37, IC: 19.1x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.37
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.21
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.37
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=19.1x, D/EBITDA=0.4x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.37
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.3680; #2172/4210 (top 51.6%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation8% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾

    12 of 13 flag SEZL's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio30.8x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 41.6x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value3.3%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.3%, ROC=None
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS41.6x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)24.9x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share30.8x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=41.6x, OE Yield=2.6%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=41.6x, FCF Yield=4.0%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=41.6x, P/B=30.8x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share25.0x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low443% of trailing low ($34.89)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+3.50%; #2210/6340 (top 34.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.0532; #4993/6449 (top 77.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS41.6x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share31.39x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.1114; #4273/5247 (top 81.4%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.70%; #1442/4519 (top 31.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+94.22%; #359/6202 (top 5.8%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth13% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾

    7 of 8 flag SEZL's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 41.6x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/6 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth66.1%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 13.9% -> 39.3%
    ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR50.3%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Valuation models17% pass✓ 1✗ 5▾

    Models split on SEZL at $154.60 — fair values range $20.51–$221.80

    Graham fair value$20.51
    ✗Graham-653.8% margin vs $154.60
    Buffett fair value$46.79
    ✗Buffett-230.4% margin vs $154.60
    Greenblatt fair value$21.91
    ✗Greenblatt-605.6% margin vs $154.60
    Munger fair value$112.79
    ✗Munger-37.1% margin vs $154.60
    Pabrai fair value$64.90
    ✗Pabrai-138.2% margin vs $154.60
    Ackman fair value$221.80
    ✓Ackman+30.3% margin vs $154.60
  • Profitability25% pass✓ 14✗ 21▾

    12 of 16 flag SEZL's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)3/7 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)3/7 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-85.9%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)39.3% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$133.8M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 41.6x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE65.8%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value3.3%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.3%, ROC=None
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets33.26%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY26.32% -> 33.26% (delta: +6.95%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=52.45%, ROA=33.26%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue39.7%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity65.8%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=41.6x, P/B=30.8x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity66.6% (3-yr avg)
    ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/6 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue41.9%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity65.8%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend13.9% (2023) -> 39.3% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 13.9% -> 39.3%
    ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+3.50%; #2210/6340 (top 34.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+65.75%; #153/5226 (top 2.9%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.2615; #4489/5884 (top 76.3%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years3/6 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Verdicts33% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾

    Split decision: 8 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 3 BUY · 1 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)•GreenblattNot ranked•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✓DremanPASS (5/11)•MungerNEUTRAL (3/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✓AkreBUY (5/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✓AckmanBUY (8/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepBUY (5/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

    5 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Marks +2 more object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$133.8M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$297.6M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$209.9M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=52.45%, ROA=33.26%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)24.9x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=41.6x, FCF Yield=4.0%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive3/6 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap5.7%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share25.0x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency3/6 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$297.6M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.70%; #1442/4519 (top 31.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Business Services
Size: Mid Cap($5.2B)
Revenue: $450.3M+66.1% YoY
Net Income: $133.1M+69.5% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin39.3%
Return on Equity78.4%
Debt / Equity0.82
Current Ratio3.92
EPS (Diluted)$3.72−71.7% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$64.7M
Buybacks (2y)$88.3M
Shares Retired−0.2% / 1.1% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 0.2% of shares last year, 1.1% over two.

Buybacks
$64.7M
Dividends
—

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY24
950.4% = 1006.3% + −5.0%
FY25
−71.7% = 69.5% + −83.3%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-26
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-27
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-29
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-28
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-30
Market Cap$5.2Bcurrent------$2.1Best.$219.3Mest.$36.1Mest.$455.2Mest.--
Revenue$581.6M↑39%$166.5M↑43%$149.7M↑52%$135.5M↑29%$450.3M↑66%$271.1M↑70%$159.4M↑27%$125.6M↑9%$114.8M
Operating Income$243.5M↑60%$64.3M↑81%$55.0M↑52%$69.0M↑38%$176.8M↑115%$82.2M↑270%$22.2M↑178%-$28.4M↑59%-$68.7M
Net Income$182.6M↑58%$47.8M↑79%$40.8M↑48%$51.3M↑42%$133.1M↑70%$78.5M↑1006%$7.1M↑119%-$38.1M↑49%-$75.2M
EPS (Diluted)--$1.38↑84%$1.17↑50%$1.47↑47%$3.72↓72%$13.13↑950%$1.25↑794%$-0.18↑53%$-0.38
Gross Margin—————————
Operating Margin41.9%↑15%38.6%↑27%36.7%50.9%↑7%39.3%↑29%30.3%↑118%13.9%↑162%-22.6%↑62%-59.8%
ROE65.8%↓12%———78.4%↓12%89.4%↑178%32.1%↑107%-430.8%↓117%-198.9%
Total Debt$102.2M↓13%$102.2M↓13%$121.5M↓7%$144.4M↑107%$140.0M↑35%$104.0M↑10%$94.4M↑48%$63.8M↓18%$77.7M
Shareholders' Equity$277.7M↑79%$277.7M↑79%$233.0M↑79%$196.7M↑56%$169.8M↑93%$87.8M↑298%$22.1M↑150%$8.8M↓77%$37.8M
Current Ratio4.21↑20%4.21↑20%4.02↑15%3.65↑40%3.92↑61%2.44↑118%1.12↓35%1.72↓17%2.06
Debt / Equity0.37↓51%0.37↓51%0.52↓48%0.73↑32%0.82↓30%1.18↓72%4.27↓41%7.21↑251%2.06
Operating Cash Flow$298.6M↑428%$86.7M↑162%$52.2M↑244%$89.0M↑51%$209.9M↑61%$130.6M↑609%-$25.7M↓402%$8.5M↑112%-$72.1M
Free Cash Flow$297.6M↑432%$86.5M↑163%$51.8M↑241%$88.6M↑51%$209.3M↑60%$130.6M↑607%-$25.8M↓405%$8.5M↑112%-$72.8M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Business Services

SEZL vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$450.3MBottom 25%
Net Income$133.1MMedian
ROE78.4%Top 25%
D/E0.82Median
Op. Margin39.3%Top 25%
Curr. Ratio3.92Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP$122.3B$309.93$21.9B$4.4B73.2%0.8224.2%1.054/95/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA$52.9B$209.70$7.5B$887.0M13.1%0.2215.4%1.051/94/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
Rubrik, Inc.RBRK$22.6B$109.88$1.3B$348.8M67.1%—-26.2%1.691/90/92/70/3F-Score 62/11
AECOMACM$9.1B$70.50$16.1B$561.8M22.5%1.096.4%1.141/93/93/71/3F-Score 82/11
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT$6.2B$152.07$1.2B$70.7M942.8%—6.3%1.951/92/94/70/3F-Score 66/11
WPP plcWPP$6.0B$27.79$18.2B$289.5M-8.5%1.942.8%0.891/92/91/70/3F-Score 32/11
VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS$5.6B$48.94$623.5M$129.3M-21.6%0.76-23.5%1.971/90/91/70/3F-Score 51/11
ROBERT HALF INC.RHI$4.3B$42.00$5.4B$133.0M10.4%—1.4%1.532/95/91/70/3F-Score 52/11