Teads Holding Co.
TEADAbout the company
Teads Holding Co., together with its subsidiaries, operates a technology platform that connects media owners and advertisers with engaged audiences to drive business outcomes in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. The company operates a two-sided marketplace, forming an end-to-end advertising platform with direct media owner and advertiser relationships.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$0.21
+26.5% vs price
Models with upside
2 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
TEAD undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $0.17 (median $0.21)
Key risk
All 12 investors flag TEAD's debt & leverage
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +33.6% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +2.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-16 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-16 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-16 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-16 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models100% pass✓ 2▾
TEAD undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $0.17 (median $0.21)
Munger fair value$0.25✓Munger+33.6% margin vs $0.17Ackman fair value$0.17✓Ackman+2.4% margin vs $0.17
Where It Falls Short
- Debt & Leverage0% pass✗ 15▾
All 12 investors flag TEAD's debt & leverage
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $639.4M vs NCA $-21.4M✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: N/A (negative equity), IC: -9.9x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / EquityN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-549.1M✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 45.57%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.94✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt LevelsN/A (non-positive equity)✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-11.4x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency3/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-4.9%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 19.7% -> 33.0%, operating margin -0.9% -> -30.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR11.1%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾
All 8 investors flag TEAD's efficiency
Current Ratio0.94✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-0.6%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-10.6%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.19 -> 1.10✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.62x -> 0.98x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.94✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital-170.1%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-3.1%; FY2024: ROIC=-4.3%; FY2025: ROIC=-45.0%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -45.0%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾
15 of 16 flag TEAD's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)2/8 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)3/8 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-108.9%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-30.7% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-504.2M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROEN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-122.3%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-122.3%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-38.94%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-0.13% -> -38.94% (delta: -38.81%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=0.57%, ROA=-38.94%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY21.6% -> 33.0%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-67.3%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=0.2x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-179.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency3/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-60.8%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-0.9% (2023) -> -30.7% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 19.7% -> 33.0%, operating margin -0.9% -> -30.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-5108.76%; #6215/6340 (top 98.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+43.37%; #858/3702 (top 23.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1563; #3976/5884 (top 67.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years2/7 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts8% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 3)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Valuation15% pass✓ 10✗ 18▾
11 of 13 flag TEAD's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +8 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio0.2x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-122.3%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-122.3%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)2.1x✓Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share0.2x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-3167.6%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=12.2%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.2x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share8.0x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($0.17)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-5108.76%; #6215/6340 (top 98.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization-19.4676; #6323/6449 (top 98.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+69.6223; #101/5247 (top 1.9%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-302.44%; #4280/4519 (top 94.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-74.20%; #5740/6202 (top 92.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
5 of 10 pass — Buffett, Lynch, Ackman +2 more object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-504.2M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-49.4M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$7.6M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=0.57%, ROA=-38.94%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)2.1x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=12.2%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive6/7 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-310.6%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share8.0x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency7/7 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-49.4M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-302.44%; #4280/4519 (top 94.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Share retirement not available for this company.
- Buybacks
- $646.0K
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.3Mcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $64.5Mest. | $301.0Mest. | $195.4Mest. | $257.0Mest. | $715.6Mest. |
| Revenue | $1.1B↓4% | $235.1M↓26% | $284.6M↓17% | $266.0M↓7% | $1.3B↑46% | $889.9M↓5% | $935.8M↓6% | $992.1M↓2% | $1.0B |
| Operating Income | -$691.7M↓1271% | -$308.2M↓4807% | -$15.6M↓593% | -$21.8M↑51% | -$399.0M↓3057% | -$12.6M↓46% | -$8.6M↑36% | -$13.5M↓139% | $34.6M |
| Net Income | -$835.0M↓838% | -$325.5M↓1553% | -$42.5M↓197% | -$38.8M↑29% | -$517.1M↓72624% | -$711.0K↓107% | $10.2M↑142% | -$24.6M↓324% | $11.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-3.31↓1476% | $-0.44↓193% | $-0.40↑43% | $-5.69↓5073% | $-0.11↓83% | $-0.06↑86% | $-0.44↓320% | $0.20 |
| Gross Margin | 31.7%↑3% | 25.9%↓22% | 33.6%↓4% | 31.4%↑9% | 33.0%↑53% | 21.6%↑9% | 19.7%↑2% | 19.4%↓18% | 23.7% |
| Operating Margin | -60.8%↓1325% | -131.1%↓6554% | -5.5%↓735% | -8.2%↑47% | -30.7%↓2060% | -1.4%↓54% | -0.9%↑32% | -1.4%↓140% | 3.4% |
| ROE | 262.4%↑1631% | — | — | — | -541.8%↓176187% | -0.3%↓107% | 4.6%↑141% | -11.3%↓364% | 4.3% |
| Total Debt | $639.4M↑6% | $639.4M↑6% | $607.4M↑1% | $606.2M↓1% | $605.1M | $0↓100% | $254.0K↓87% | $2.0M↓99% | $236.0M |
| Shareholders' Equity | -$318.2M↓161% | -$318.2M↓161% | $7.4M↓99% | $50.3M↓89% | $95.4M↓59% | $231.3M↑4% | $223.1M↑2% | $217.8M↓15% | $256.8M |
| Current Ratio | 0.94↓13% | 0.94↓13% | 0.98↓10% | 1.04↓8% | 1.10↓8% | 1.19↓12% | 1.35↓19% | 1.67↓29% | 2.34 |
| Debt / Equity | -2.01↓273% | -2.01↓273% | 82.60↑7188% | 12.06↑837% | 6.34 | 0.00↓100% | 0.00↓88% | 0.01↓99% | 0.92 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$46.3M↓208% | -$27.9M↓17% | $9.2M↓63% | -$34.9M↓3510% | $7.6M↓89% | $68.6M↑399% | $13.7M↑261% | $3.8M↓93% | $56.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$49.4M↓239% | -$28.4M↓16% | $8.0M↓66% | -$35.6M↓816% | $2.0M↓97% | $61.2M↑1591% | $3.6M↑138% | -$9.6M↓120% | $47.0M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
TEAD vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |