TANDY LEATHER FACTORY INC

TLF

Tandy Leather Factory, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, retails leather and leathercraft-related items in the United States, Canada, and Spain. It offers leather, hand tools, hardware, kits, liquids, teaching materials, open workbenches, machines, and other supplies. The company manufactures leather laces, cut leather pieces, do-it-yourself kits, thread laces, belt strips and straps, and Craftaid tooling template through its stores and website, as well as direct account representative.

About the company

Country: United StatesPrice: $2.26Market Cap: $18.5M

Investment snapshot

35%positive consensus

Scored 1d ago

Positive

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

6 / 4

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$4.58

+102.9% vs price

Models with upside

6 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

Models split on TLF at $2.26 — fair values range $0.81–$27.50

Key risk

Split decision: 6 NEUTRAL · 4 FAIL · 3 PASS · 3 BUY

Framework analysis

Verdict	Meaning
BUY	Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASS	The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRAL	Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAIL	The company does not clear the framework's requirements.
Ranked	Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

Metric	Graham Defensive Value	Buffett Quality Compounder	Lynch GARP	Greenblatt Magic Formula	Piotroski F-Score	Dreman Contrarian Value	Munger Quality Focus	Pabrai Dhandho Framework	Akre Three-Legged Stool	Marks Risk-Aware Value	Ackman Activist Value	Templeton Global Bargain Hunter	Sleep Scale Economies Shared	Asness Systematic Factors	Neff Low-P/E Total Return	Schloss Asset-Value Discipline	O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite
Verdict	PASS	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL · Rank #2249 (Top 72.6%)	NEUTRAL	NEUTRAL	NEUTRAL	NEUTRAL	FAIL	BUY	FAIL	NEUTRAL	PASS	BUY	PASS	BUY	NEUTRAL
Score
Analysis	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)		N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Margin of Safety	+82.2%	N/A	+91.8%	-69.9%	N/A	+72.4%	+10.7%	N/A	+57.4%	+41.6%	N/A	-179.0%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Financial Basis	TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14	TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14	TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

Valuation models75% pass✓ 6✗ 2▾
Models split on TLF at $2.26 — fair values range $0.81–$27.50
Graham fair value$12.70
✓Graham+82.2% margin vs $2.26
Lynch fair value$27.50
✓Lynch+91.8% margin vs $2.26
Greenblatt fair value$1.33
✗Greenblatt-69.9% margin vs $2.26
Dreman fair value$8.20
✓Dreman+72.4% margin vs $2.26
Munger fair value$2.53
✓Munger+10.7% margin vs $2.26
Akre fair value$5.30
✓Akre+57.4% margin vs $2.26
Marks fair value$3.87
✓Marks+41.6% margin vs $2.26
Templeton fair value$0.81
✗Templeton-179.0% margin vs $2.26
Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: N/A
✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
Total Debt / Equity0
✓Lynch< 0.33
Cash - Long-term Debt
✗LynchPositive preferred
LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.69
✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0
✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
Debt Levels0
✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA
✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0
✓Ackman<= 1.0
Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0000; #1/4210 (top 0.0%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Growth63% pass✓ 9✗ 4▾
5 of 8 pass — Ackman, Sleep and Neff object
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)37.8%
✓Graham>= 33% growth
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.03
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR61.9%
✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 4.3% vs Rev: 5.3%
✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
EPS Growth Direction$0.31 (2009) -> $1.10 (2025)
✓DremanPositive over recent years
EPS CAGR8.2% CAGR over 16 years
✓Dreman> 5% annualized
Positive Net Income Frequency15/17 years positive
✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
3yr Median Revenue Growth-2.4%
✗Ackman>= 5%
Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
5-Year EPS CAGR61.9% CAGR over 4 years
✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 59.2% -> 57.0%, operating margin 5.8% -> -1.3%
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
5-year Revenue CAGR3.6%
✗SleepCAGR > 7%
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR61.9% over 4 years
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Valuation62% pass✓ 19✗ 9▾
8 of 13 pass — Greenblatt, Dreman, Ackman +2 more object
Price / 3-yr avg EPS4.1x
✓Graham<= 15x
Price-to-Book Ratio0.3x
✓Graham<= 1.5x
P/E x P/B1.40
✓Graham<= 22.5
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.03
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
EBIT / Enterprise Value-39.7%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-39.7%, ROC=-2.8%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Price / EPS2.1x
✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
✗Dreman< 8x
Price / Book Value per Share0.3x
✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=2.1x
✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=2.1x, FCF Yield=-43.7%
✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=2.1x, P/B=0.3x
✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
Discount to Intrinsic Value72.4% (IV=$8.20 vs Price=$2.26)
✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
✗Ackman<= 25
Price vs. Trailing Low103% of trailing low ($2.20)
✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
Net income / market capitalization+0.94%; #2993/6340 (top 47.2%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Positive book equity / market capitalization+2.5665; #534/6449 (top 8.3%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Price / Diluted EPS2.1x
✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E64.14
✓Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.35x
✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
Book Value per Share Change+14.2%
✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
Revenue / market capitalization+4.2384; #623/5247 (top 11.9%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-0.57%; #2618/4519 (top 57.9%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-1.74%; #2907/6202 (top 46.9%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Verdicts55% pass✓ 6✗ 5▾
Split decision: 6 NEUTRAL · 4 FAIL · 3 PASS · 3 BUY
Overall verdict
✓GrahamPASS (5/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #2249•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)•DremanNEUTRAL (7/11)•MungerNEUTRAL (3/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✓MarksBUY (4/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (6/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #338/2370 (Top 14.3%))✓NeffPASS (4/6)✓SchlossBUY (6/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Where It Falls Short

Profitability19% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾
13 of 16 flag TLF's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more
Positive EPS (10 years)15/17 years positive
✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)37.8%
✓Graham>= 33% growth
Net Income Positive (10+ years)15/17 years positive
✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)6.1%
✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-1.3% (latest)
✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
Free Cash Flow Proxy$5.1M
✓BuffettPositive and growing
Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.99
✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
Retained Earnings Effectiveness
✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.03
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR61.9%
✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
ROE0.4%
✗Lynch> 15%
EBIT / Enterprise Value-39.7%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-39.7%, ROC=-2.8%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Net Income / Total Assets10.51%
✓PiotroskiROA > 0
ROA Change YoY1.10% -> 10.51% (delta: +9.40%)
✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-0.64%, ROA=10.51%
✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Gross Margin Change YoY56.2% -> 57.0%
✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
Pre-Tax Income / Revenue0.6%
✗Dreman>= 8%
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity0.4%
✗Dreman> 12%
Margin of SafetyP/E=2.1x, P/B=0.3x
✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
Return on Equity8.5% (3-yr avg)
✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
Discount to Intrinsic Value72.4% (IV=$8.20 vs Price=$2.26)
✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Positive Net Income Frequency15/17 years positive
✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
Operating Income / Revenue1.1%
✗Ackman>= 15%
Net Income / Shareholders Equity0.4%
✗Ackman>= 15%
5-Year EPS CAGR61.9% CAGR over 4 years
✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Operating Margin Trend5.8% (2023) -> -1.3% (2025)
✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 59.2% -> 57.0%, operating margin 5.8% -> -1.3%
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
Net income / market capitalization+0.94%; #2993/6340 (top 47.2%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Gross profit / total assets+57.76%; #511/3702 (top 13.8%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Net income / positive book equity+0.37%; #2877/5226 (top 55.1%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0351; #2109/5884 (top 35.8%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR61.9% over 4 years
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Positive Diluted-EPS Years8/10 years positive
✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag TLF's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio4.69
✓Graham>= 2.0
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)2.8%
✗Buffett> 10%
ROIC - WACC-7.2%
✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-2.8%
✗Greenblatt> 25%
Current Ratio Change YoY5.11 -> 5.16
✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.99x -> 0.88x
✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.69
✓Dreman> 1.5
Return on Invested Capital-1.4%
✗Munger> 15%
ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=6.2%; FY2024: ROIC=0.9%; FY2025: ROIC=-1.4%
✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
Reinvestment Rate x ROIC-0.0% (RR=0% x ROIC=-1.4%)
✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -1.4%)
✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Cash Flow40% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾
6 of 10 flag TLF's cash flow — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +3 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$5.1M
✓BuffettPositive and growing
FCF Positive and Growing$-0.1M
✗LynchPositive and growing
Operating Cash Flow$-0.6M
✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-0.64%, ROA=10.51%
✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
✗Dreman< 8x
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=2.1x, FCF Yield=-43.7%
✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
FCF Positive13/17 years FCF positive
✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-0.6%
✗Ackman>= 4%
Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
✗Ackman<= 25
Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency15/17 years positive
✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-0.1M
✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-0.57%; #2618/4519 (top 57.9%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Apparel

SIC Sector: Leather Products

Size: Micro Cap($18.5M)

Revenue: $76.3M+2.6% YoY

Net Income: $9.1M+1000.6% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-1.3%

Return on Equity17.3%

Debt / Equity0.00

Current Ratio5.16

EPS (Diluted)$1.10+1122.2% 1y

Buybacks (1y)$1.4M

Buybacks (2y)$1.4M

Shares Retired5.0% / 3.9% 2y

Similar Companies

LULUlululemon athletica inc.

$12.2B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 5.0% of shares last year, 3.9% over two.

Buybacks: $1.4M
Dividends: $12.7M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22

−6.3% = −9.4% + 3.5%

FY23

200.0% = 207.1% + −2.3%

FY24

−80.0% = −78.1% + −8.9%

FY25

1122.2% = 1000.6% + 11.1%

Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

Metric	TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-K · 2026-02-24 10-Q · 2026-05-11 10-Q · 2026-08-11 10-Q · 2026-11-10 Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.	Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-Q · 2026-11-10 Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.	Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-Q · 2026-08-11 Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.	Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources 10-Q · 2026-05-11	FY 2025 Sources 10-K · 2026-02-24	FY 2024 Sources 10-K · 2025-02-26	FY 2023 Sources 10-K · 2024-03-22	FY 2022 Sources 10-K · 2023-03-31	FY 2021 Sources 10-K · 2022-03-31
Market Cap	$18.5Mcurrent	--	--	--	$17.4Mest.	$22.6Mest.	$20.0Mest.	$20.2Mest.	$23.4Mest.
Revenue	$78.5M↑5%	$18.5M↑7%	$18.0M↑2%	$19.7M↑3%	$76.3M↑3%	$74.4M↓2%	$76.2M↓5%	$80.3M↓3%	$82.7M
Operating Income	$852.0K↑610%	$556.0K↑182%	$543.0K↑723%	$365.0K↑39%	-$963.0K↓253%	$628.0K↓86%	$4.4M↑218%	$1.4M↓40%	$2.3M
Net Income	$174.0K↓98%	$473.0K↑135%	$409.0K↑306%	$222.0K↓98%	$9.1M↑1001%	$827.0K↓78%	$3.8M↑207%	$1.2M↓9%	$1.4M
EPS (Diluted)	--	$0.06↑135%	$0.05↑350%	$0.03↓98%	$1.10↑1122%	$0.09↓80%	$0.45↑200%	$0.15↓6%	$0.16
Gross Margin	60.3%↑6%	62.4%↑6%	64.8%↑9%	61.0%↑8%	57.0%↑2%	56.2%↓5%	59.2%↑2%	57.9%↑2%	56.9%
Operating Margin	1.1%↑585%	3.0%↑176%	3.0%↑710%	1.9%↑35%	-1.3%↓249%	0.8%↓85%	5.8%↑235%	1.7%↓38%	2.8%
ROE	0.4%↓98%	—	—	—	17.3%↑1096%	1.4%↓78%	6.7%↑180%	2.4%↓9%	2.6%
Total Debt	--	--	--	--	$0	$0↓100%	$1.0K	$0↓100%	$415.0K
Shareholders' Equity	$47.5M↓11%	$47.5M↓11%	$47.0M↓18%	$46.5M↓18%	$52.6M↓8%	$57.2M↑1%	$56.3M↑9%	$51.5M	$51.5M
Current Ratio	4.69↓10%	4.69↓10%	4.55↓7%	4.23↓6%	5.16↑1%	5.11↓11%	5.74↑8%	5.33↑29%	4.13
Debt / Equity	—	—	—	—	0.00	0.00↓100%	0.00	0.00↓100%	0.01
Operating Cash Flow	$2.2M↑314%	-$423.0K↑59%	-$3.3M↑18%	$906.0K↑269%	-$556.0K↓112%	$4.5M	$4.5M↑293%	$1.2M↓69%	$3.7M
Free Cash Flow	-$106.0K↑99%	-$772.0K↑74%	-$3.7M↑49%	$319.0K↑117%	-$8.1M↓617%	$1.6M↓60%	$4.0M↑663%	$519.0K↓81%	$2.7M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Apparel

TLF vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$76.3MBottom 25%

Net Income$9.1MBottom 25%

ROE17.3%Median

D/E0.00Top 25%

Op. Margin-1.3%Bottom 25%

Curr. Ratio5.16Top 25%

Company	Market Cap	Price	Revenue	Net Income	ROE	D/E	Op. Margin	Curr. Ratio	Graham	Buffett	Lynch	Greenblatt	Piotroski	Dreman
CINTAS CORPCTAS	$89.8B	$226.24	$10.3B	$1.8B	38.7%	0.52	22.8%	2.09	2/9	6/9	3/7	1/3	F-Score 7	4/11
TAPESTRY, INC.TPR	$26.0B	$132.41	$7.0B	$183.2M	21.4%	2.79	5.9%	1.87	1/9	3/9	3/7	1/3	F-Score 5	3/11
Amer Sports, Inc.AS	$17.4B	$29.94	$6.6B	$427.4M	7.4%	0.14	10.7%	1.50	2/9	3/9	2/7	1/3	F-Score 7	4/11
lululemon athletica inc.LULU	$12.2B	$105.65	$11.1B	$1.6B	31.8%	0.00	19.9%	2.26	4/9	6/9	6/7	3/3	F-Score 6	7/11
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPDECK	$11.6B	$86.82	$5.5B	$1.0B	41.0%	—	23.1%	3.54	2/9	5/9	3/7	3/3	F-Score 7	4/11
On Holding AGONON	$11.3B	$33.63	$3.8B	$257.3M	12.5%	0.32	12.5%	2.71	2/9	5/9	2/7	1/3	F-Score 7	4/11
LEVI STRAUSS & COLEVI	$9.3B	$24.29	$6.3B	$578.1M	25.4%	0.46	10.8%	1.55	3/9	5/9	4/7	1/3	F-Score 7	5/11
V F CORPVFC	$8.1B	$20.68	$9.6B	$254.9M	13.8%	1.90	6.0%	1.84	2/9	0/9	1/7	1/3	F-Score 7	2/11