Vertiv Holdings Co

VRT
About the company

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures, and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and life cycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

Country: United StatesPrice: $202.07Market Cap: $77.8B

Investment snapshot

35%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

6

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 6

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$29.40

-85.5% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

VRT overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $202.07 (median $29.40)

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILPASSBUYFAIL · Rank #684 (Top 22.1%)PASSPASSPASSFAILNEUTRALFAILBUYNEUTRALNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALFAILFAIL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-618.9%-360.3%-137.0%-621.4%N/A-587.3%-71.1%-207.9%-1409.1%-8462.3%-14.0%-991.7%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-13

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-13

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-13

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-28

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Valuation models0% pass✗ 11▾

      VRT overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $202.07 (median $29.40)

      Graham fair value$28.11
      ✗Graham-618.9% margin vs $202.07
      Buffett fair value$43.90
      ✗Buffett-360.3% margin vs $202.07
      Lynch fair value$85.25
      ✗Lynch-137.0% margin vs $202.07
      Greenblatt fair value$28.01
      ✗Greenblatt-621.4% margin vs $202.07
      Dreman fair value$29.40
      ✗Dreman-587.3% margin vs $202.07
      Munger fair value$118.07
      ✗Munger-71.1% margin vs $202.07
      Pabrai fair value$65.63
      ✗Pabrai-207.9% margin vs $202.07
      Akre fair value$13.39
      ✗Akre-1409.1% margin vs $202.07
      Marks fair value$2.36
      ✗Marks-8462.3% margin vs $202.07
      Ackman fair value$177.32
      ✗Ackman-14.0% margin vs $202.07
      Templeton fair value$18.51
      ✗Templeton-991.7% margin vs $202.07
    • Valuation8% pass✓ 3✗ 25▾

      12 of 13 flag VRT's valuation — Graham, Greenblatt, Dreman +9 more

      Price / 3-yr avg EPS103.1x
      ✗Graham<= 15x
      Price-to-Book Ratio19.6x
      ✗Graham<= 1.5x
      P/E x P/B2,022.3
      ✗Graham<= 22.5
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.75
      ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise Value3.4%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.4%, ROC=215.2%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / EPS59.3x
      ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price / (CFO / Shares)36.6x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Price / Book Value per Share19.6x
      ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=59.3x, OE Yield=1.8%
      ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/E or FCF YieldP/E=59.3x, FCF Yield=2.4%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=59.3x, P/B=19.6x
      ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic Value-587.3% (IV=$29.40 vs Price=$202.07)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / FCF per Share40.8x
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Price vs. Trailing Low280% of trailing low ($72.20)
      ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Net income / market capitalization+2.70%; #2488/6340 (top 39.2%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.0707; #4897/6449 (top 75.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS59.3x
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E1.34
      ✓Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share6039.97x
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change+588.0%
      ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization+0.1686; #3939/5247 (top 75.1%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+4.01%; #1791/4519 (top 39.6%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-38.49%; #4745/6202 (top 76.5%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Profitability31% pass✓ 17✗ 18▾

      11 of 16 flag VRT's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +8 more

      Positive EPS (10 years)4/11 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)5/11 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)18.2%
      ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)17.9% (latest)
      ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.4B
      ✓BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)7.88
      ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.75
      ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR79.3%
      ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE38.1%
      ✓Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise Value3.4%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.4%, ROC=215.2%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets10.91%
      ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY5.43% -> 10.91% (delta: +5.48%)
      ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=17.31%, ROA=10.91%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY36.6% -> 36.3%
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue19.9%
      ✓Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity38.1%
      ✓Dreman> 12%
      Margin of SafetyP/E=59.3x, P/B=19.6x
      ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
      Return on Equity25.7% (3-yr avg)
      ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic Value-587.3% (IV=$29.40 vs Price=$202.07)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency5/10 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue20.1%
      ✓Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity38.1%
      ✓Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR79.3% CAGR over 4 years
      ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend12.7% (2023) -> 17.9% (2025)
      ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 35.0% -> 36.3%, operating margin 12.7% -> 17.9%
      ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Net income / market capitalization+2.70%; #2488/6340 (top 39.2%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Gross profit / total assets+30.42%; #1402/3702 (top 37.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity+38.13%; #317/5226 (top 6.1%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0352; #2110/5884 (top 35.9%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR79.3% over 4 years
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years4/8 years positive
      ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Growth38% pass✓ 8✗ 5▾

      5 of 8 flag VRT's growth — Graham, Lynch, Marks +2 more

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.75
      ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR79.3%
      ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 128.8% vs Rev: 35.3%
      ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction$-2.65 (2018) -> $3.41 (2025)
      ✓DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR79.3% CAGR over 4 years
      ✓Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency5/10 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth20.6%
      ✓Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth
      ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR79.3% CAGR over 4 years
      ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 35.0% -> 36.3%, operating margin 12.7% -> 17.9%
      ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR18.5%
      ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR79.3% over 4 years
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Debt & Leverage42% pass✓ 8✗ 7▾

      7 of 12 flag VRT's debt & leverage — Buffett, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

      LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $2.9B vs NCA $3.4B
      ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.53, IC: 73.2x
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity0.53
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt$587.8M
      ✓LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change31.83% -> 23.68%
      ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.39
      ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.53
      ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      Debt Levels0.53
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=73.2x, D/EBITDA=1.0x
      ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.53
      ✓Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.5323; #2535/4210 (top 60.2%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    • Verdicts46% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾

      Split decision: 6 FAIL · 4 PASS · 4 NEUTRAL · 2 BUY

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✓BuffettPASS (5/9)✓LynchBUY (5/7)✗GreenblattRank #684✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✓DremanPASS (6/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)•AkreNEUTRAL (4/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✓AckmanBUY (8/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #795/2370 (Top 33.5%))•NeffNEUTRAL (4/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #940/963 (Top 97.6%))
    • Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

      5 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Ackman +2 more object

      Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.4B
      ✓BuffettPositive and growing
      FCF Positive and Growing$3.1B
      ✓LynchPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$2.1B
      ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=17.31%, ROA=10.91%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)36.6x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      P/E or FCF YieldP/E=59.3x, FCF Yield=2.4%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      FCF Positive6/8 years FCF positive
      ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
      (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap4.0%
      ✓Ackman>= 4%
      Price / FCF per Share40.8x
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency6/9 years positive
      ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$3.1B
      ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+4.01%; #1791/4519 (top 39.6%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Efficiency50% pass✓ 6✗ 5▾

      4 of 8 pass — Graham, Piotroski, Dreman +1 more object

      Current Ratio1.39
      ✗Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)16.0%
      ✓Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC+6.0%
      ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)215.2%
      ✓Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY1.65 -> 1.55
      ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.88x -> 0.84x
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.39
      ✗Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital24.8%
      ✓Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=13.9%; FY2024: ROIC=20.1%; FY2025: ROIC=21.1%
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROIC23.6% (RR=95% x ROIC=24.8%)
      ✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)3/5 years above 12% (latest 21.1%)
      ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Electronic Equipment
    SIC Sector: Electronic & Electrical Equipment
    Size: Large Cap($77.8B)
    Revenue: $10.2B+27.7% YoY
    Net Income: $1.3B+168.8% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin17.9%
    Return on Equity33.8%
    Debt / Equity0.74
    Current Ratio1.55
    EPS (Diluted)$3.41+166.4% 1y
    Buybacks (1y)$0
    Buybacks (2y)$599.9M
    Shares Retired−0.5% / −0.2% 2y

    Shareholder Return

    Fiscal 2025

    Issued 0.5% of shares last year, 0.2% issued over two.

    Buybacks
    $0
    Dividends
    $66.6M

    What drove EPS

    A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

    FY24
    7.6% = 7.7% + −0.2%
    FY25
    166.4% = 168.8% + −0.9%
    Earnings Fewer shares More shares

    The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

    Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

    MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

    2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks.

    Q3 FY 2026

    2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.

    Q2 FY 2026

    2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.

    Q1 FY 2026

    2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

    Sources
    FY 2025
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2026-02-13
    FY 2024
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2025-02-18
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2024-02-23
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-02-27
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2022-03-01
    Market Cap$77.8Bcurrent------$71.2Best.$44.5Best.$21.5Best.$5.4Best.$7.8Best.
    Revenue$13.1B↑35%$4.3B↑61%$3.3B↑24%$2.6B↑30%$10.2B↑28%$8.0B↑17%$6.9B↑21%$5.7B↑14%$5.0B
    Operating Income$2.6B↑55%$983.8M↑90%$637.9M↑44%$440.1M↑51%$1.8B↑34%$1.4B↑57%$872.2M↑290%$223.4M↓14%$259.9M
    Net Income$2.1B↑103%$764.5M↑92%$497.8M↑54%$390.1M↑137%$1.3B↑169%$495.8M↑8%$460.2M↑501%$76.6M↓36%$119.6M
    EPS (Diluted)--$1.95↑91%$1.27↑53%$0.99↑136%$3.41↑166%$1.28↑8%$1.19↑3075%$-0.04↓112%$0.33
    Gross Margin————36.3%↓1%36.6%↑5%35.0%↑23%28.4%↓7%30.5%
    Operating Margin20.1%↑14%22.8%↑18%19.5%↑16%16.6%↑16%17.9%↑5%17.1%↑34%12.7%↑224%3.9%↓25%5.2%
    ROE38.1%↑29%———33.8%↑66%20.4%↓11%22.8%↑330%5.3%↓37%8.4%
    Total Debt$2.9B$2.9B$2.9B↑1%$2.9B$2.9B↓1%$2.9B$2.9B↓8%$3.2B↑7%$3.0B
    Shareholders' Equity$5.5B↑57%$5.5B↑57%$4.8B↑52%$4.2B↑59%$3.9B↑62%$2.4B↑21%$2.0B↑40%$1.4B↑2%$1.4B
    Current Ratio1.39↓24%1.39↓24%1.38↓21%1.49↓13%1.55↓6%1.65↓5%1.74↑4%1.66↑14%1.45
    Debt / Equity0.53↓36%0.53↓36%0.62↓34%0.69↓37%0.74↓39%1.20↓18%1.46↓34%2.21↑6%2.10
    Operating Cash Flow$3.6B↑133%$794.0M↑56%$1.1B↑241%$766.8M↑153%$2.1B↑60%$1.3B↑47%$900.5M↑689%-$152.8M↓172%$210.9M
    Free Cash Flow$3.1B↑127%$654.9M↑41%$926.5M↑233%$654.2M↑145%$1.9B↑64%$1.2B↑49%$772.6M↑406%-$252.8M↓284%$137.5M

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Electronic Equipment

    VRT vs Peers — Financial Grading

    Revenue$10.2BBottom 25%
    Net Income$1.3BBottom 25%
    ROE33.8%Top 25%
    D/E0.74Bottom 25%
    Op. Margin17.9%Median
    Curr. Ratio1.55Median
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    NVIDIA CORPNVDA$3.93T$162.85$215.9B$120.1B76.3%0.0560.4%3.913/96/93/71/3F-Score 45/11
    INTEL CORPINTC$317.1B$59.66$52.9B$267.0M-0.2%0.41-4.2%2.023/90/91/70/3F-Score 63/11
    TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCTXN$277.4B$303.60$17.7B$5.0B30.7%0.8634.1%4.356/95/93/71/3F-Score 77/11
    ANALOG DEVICES INCADI$192.8B$397.97$11.0B$2.3B6.7%0.2426.6%2.192/93/94/71/3F-Score 84/11
    Motorola Solutions, Inc.MSI$87.8B$531.20$11.7B$2.2B89.4%3.4925.6%1.042/94/93/71/3F-Score 65/11
    L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/LHX$50.7B$272.35—$1.6B8.2%0.57—1.192/92/93/71/3F-Score 73/11
    NOKIA CORPNOK$45.7B$8.07$23.4B$764.7M3.1%0.164.4%1.582/91/93/71/3F-Score 53/11
    ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE COERIC$34.2B$10.56$25.7B$3.1B26.0%0.3016.3%1.292/95/95/73/3F-Score 77/11