Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
ZETAAbout the company
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. operates an omnichannel data-driven cloud platform that provides enterprises with consumer intelligence and marketing automation software in the United States and internationally. The company operates Zeta Marketing platform, a single platform designed to enable enterprises to acquire, grow, and retain consumer relationships more efficiently and effectively than alternative solutions.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$10.98
-70.0% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
11 of 12 pass — Asness objects
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1294 (Top 41.8%) | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -2462.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -83.3% | -1760.4% | N/A | N/A | -22.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-25 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-25 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-25 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage92% pass✓ 14✗ 1▾
11 of 12 pass — Asness objects
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $243.9M vs NCA $432.7M✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.24, IC: 23.6x✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.24✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$96.1M✓LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change17.66% -> 13.11%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.30✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.24✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.24✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=23.6x, D/EBITDA=1.6x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.24✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.2444; #1835/4210 (top 43.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow60% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
6 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$26.7M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$260.3M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$198.9M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=13.23%, ROA=-2.10%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)40.7x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=2.0%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive7/7 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap3.2%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share43.7x✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency7/7 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$260.3M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+2.78%; #2084/4519 (top 46.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio10.1x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value0.7%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=0.7%, ROC=54.7%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)40.7x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share10.1x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=0.3%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=2.0%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=10.1x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share43.7x✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low281% of trailing low ($13.06)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+0.42%; #3087/6340 (top 48.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1066; #4707/6449 (top 73.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share137.67x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.1844; #3853/5247 (top 73.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+2.78%; #2084/4519 (top 46.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+98.97%; #335/6202 (top 5.4%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models0% pass✗ 4▾
ZETA overvalued: all 4 models price fair value below $36.65 (median $10.98)
Buffett fair value$1.43✗Buffett-2462.9% margin vs $36.65Munger fair value$20.00✗Munger-83.3% margin vs $36.65Pabrai fair value$1.97✗Pabrai-1760.4% margin vs $36.65Ackman fair value$30.04✗Ackman-22.0% margin vs $36.65 - Profitability6% pass✓ 8✗ 27▾
15 of 16 flag ZETA's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/8 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/8 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-122.4%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)0.4% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$26.7M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE4.0%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value0.7%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=0.7%, ROC=54.7%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-2.10%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-6.28% -> -2.10% (delta: +4.18%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=13.23%, ROA=-2.10%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY60.3% -> 60.6%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue2.1%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity4.0%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=10.1x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-39.4% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue3.6%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity4.0%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-23.0% (2023) -> 0.4% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 62.3% -> 60.6%, operating margin -23.0% -> 0.4%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+0.42%; #3087/6340 (top 48.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+52.62%; #609/3702 (top 16.5%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+3.98%; #2569/5226 (top 49.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.2562; #4467/5884 (top 75.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years0/7 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts13% pass✓ 2✗ 13▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 2 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #1294✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1108/2370 (Top 46.8%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Growth25% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag ZETA's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-1.77 (2019) -> $-0.14 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth29.7%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 62.3% -> 60.6%, operating margin -23.0% -> 0.4%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR28.8%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency38% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
5 of 8 flag ZETA's efficiency — Buffett, Piotroski, Munger +2 more
Current Ratio2.30✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-57.9%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-67.9%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)54.7%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY3.09 -> 1.60✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.90x -> 0.87x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.30✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital3.9%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-36.3%; FY2024: ROIC=-6.1%; FY2025: ROIC=0.4%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 0.4%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 18.7% of shares last year, 40.9% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $120.1M
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.4Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $4.1Best. | $3.4Best. | $1.5Best. | $1.3Best. | $805.0Mest. |
| Revenue | $1.7B↑41% | $492.7M↑46% | $442.8M↑44% | $396.3M↑50% | $1.3B↑30% | $1.0B↑38% | $728.7M↑23% | $591.0M↑29% | $458.3M |
| Operating Income | $61.9M↑1216% | $45.9M↑425% | $16.9M↑432% | -$18.8M↓17% | $5.4M↑108% | -$67.9M↑59% | -$167.7M↑35% | -$259.0M↓4% | -$248.4M |
| Net Income | $39.7M↑274% | $38.3M↑1153% | $8.2M↑164% | -$13.2M↑39% | -$31.5M↑55% | -$69.8M↑63% | -$187.5M↑33% | -$279.2M↓12% | -$249.6M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.14↑800% | $0.03↑150% | $-0.06↑40% | $-0.14↑63% | $-0.38↑68% | $-1.20↑40% | $-2.01↑32% | $-2.95 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | 60.6%↑1% | 60.3%↓3% | 62.3%↓2% | 63.5%↑3% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6%↑892% | 9.3%↑259% | 3.8%↑331% | -4.8%↑22% | 0.4%↑106% | -6.8%↑71% | -23.0%↑48% | -43.8%↑19% | -54.2% |
| ROE | 4.0%↑220% | — | — | — | -3.9%↑62% | -10.3%↑90% | -103.9%↑52% | -218.1%↑21% | -275.8% |
| Total Debt | $243.9M↑24% | $243.9M↑24% | $197.5M | $197.3M | $197.1M | $196.3M↑7% | $184.1M | $184.0M | $183.6M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $998.1M↑45% | $998.1M↑45% | $926.5M↑38% | $880.3M↑30% | $804.6M↑19% | $676.8M↑275% | $180.5M↑41% | $128.0M↑41% | $90.5M |
| Current Ratio | 2.30↓24% | 2.30↓24% | 2.38↓27% | 2.07↓38% | 1.60↓48% | 3.09↑76% | 1.76↓4% | 1.84↓1% | 1.85 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.24↓14% | 0.24↓14% | 0.21↓27% | 0.22↓23% | 0.24↓16% | 0.29↓72% | 1.02↓29% | 1.44↓29% | 2.03 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $274.4M↑54% | $91.3M↑58% | $69.2M↑65% | $49.7M↑43% | $198.9M↑49% | $133.9M↑48% | $90.5M↑15% | $78.5M↑77% | $44.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | $260.3M↑63% | $88.3M↑68% | $64.4M↑62% | $46.7M↑46% | $185.1M↑71% | $108.1M↑54% | $70.0M↑25% | $56.3M↑62% | $34.8M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
ZETA vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $122.3B | $309.93 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $22.6B | $109.88 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| AECOMACM | $9.1B | $70.50 | $16.1B | $561.8M | 22.5% | 1.09 | 6.4% | 1.14 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 2/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.2B | $152.07 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| WPP plcWPP | $6.0B | $27.79 | $18.2B | $289.5M | -8.5% | 1.94 | 2.8% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 3 | 2/11 |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INCVRNS | $5.6B | $48.94 | $623.5M | $129.3M | -21.6% | 0.76 | -23.5% | 1.97 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 1/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $4.3B | $42.00 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |