ABEONA THERAPEUTICS INC.

ABEO

Abeona Therapeutics Inc., a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company, develops gene and cell therapies for life-threatening diseases in the United States. It develops ZEVASKYN, an autologous, cell-based gene therapy for the treatment of patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. The company also develops ABO-503 to treat X-linked retinoschisis; ABO-504 for the treatment of stargardt disease; and ABO-505 to treat autosomal dominant optic atrophy. In addition, it is developing AAV-based gene therapy through its AIM vector platform programs.

About the company

Country: United StatesPrice: $2.42Market Cap: $149.2M

Investment snapshot

18%positive consensus

Scored 1d ago

Positive

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 9

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$15.28

+531.4% vs price

Models with upside

3 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

ABEO undervalued: all 3 models price fair value above $2.42 (median $15.28)

Key risk

15 of 16 flag ABEO's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

Framework analysis

Verdict	Meaning
BUY	Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASS	The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRAL	Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAIL	The company does not clear the framework's requirements.
Ranked	Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

Metric	Graham Defensive Value	Buffett Quality Compounder	Lynch GARP	Greenblatt Magic Formula	Piotroski F-Score	Dreman Contrarian Value	Munger Quality Focus	Pabrai Dhandho Framework	Akre Three-Legged Stool	Marks Risk-Aware Value	Ackman Activist Value	Templeton Global Bargain Hunter	Sleep Scale Economies Shared	Asness Systematic Factors	Neff Low-P/E Total Return	Schloss Asset-Value Discipline	O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite
Verdict	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL · Rank #2806 (Top 90.6%)	PASS	PASS	PASS	NEUTRAL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	NEUTRAL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	NEUTRAL	NEUTRAL
Score
Analysis	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)			N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Margin of Safety	+70.2%	+84.2%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	+88.6%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Financial Basis	TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14	TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14	TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-09 Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

Valuation models100% pass✓ 3▾
ABEO undervalued: all 3 models price fair value above $2.42 (median $15.28)
Graham fair value$8.11
✓Graham+70.2% margin vs $2.42
Buffett fair value$15.28
✓Buffett+84.2% margin vs $2.42
Pabrai fair value$21.27
✓Pabrai+88.6% margin vs $2.42
Debt & Leverage83% pass✓ 13✗ 2▾
10 of 12 pass — Buffett and Marks object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $11.8M vs NCA $130.0M
✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.09, IC: -24.5x
✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
Total Debt / Equity0.09
✓Lynch< 0.33
Cash - Long-term Debt$54.4M
✓LynchPositive preferred
LT Debt / Total Assets Change11.97% -> 3.56%
✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities5.69
✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.09
✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
Debt Levels0.09
✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-24.5x, D/EBITDA=N/A
✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.09
✓Ackman<= 1.0
Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0941; #1258/4210 (top 29.9%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾
15 of 16 flag ABEO's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)2/23 years positive
✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
✗Graham>= 33% growth
Net Income Positive (10+ years)2/23 years positive
✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-162.9%
✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-1536.9% (latest)
✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
Free Cash Flow Proxy$71.2M
✓BuffettPositive and growing
Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)
✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
Retained Earnings Effectiveness
✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 2.4x (growth N/A)
✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR
✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
ROE-49.7%
✗Lynch> 15%
EBIT / Enterprise Value-76.6%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-76.6%, ROC=-99.2%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Net Income / Total Assets32.42%
✓PiotroskiROA > 0
ROA Change YoY-58.51% -> 32.42% (delta: +90.93%)
✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-34.76%, ROA=32.42%
✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Gross Margin Change YoY
✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-160.8%
✗Dreman>= 8%
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-49.7%
✗Dreman> 12%
Margin of SafetyP/E=2.4x, P/B=0.8x
✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
Return on Equity-155.2% (3-yr avg)
✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Positive Net Income Frequency2/16 years positive
✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
Operating Income / Revenue-186.1%
✗Ackman>= 15%
Net Income / Shareholders Equity-49.7%
✗Ackman>= 15%
5-Year EPS CAGR
✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Operating Margin Trend
✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -1346.7% -> -1536.9%
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
Net income / market capitalization-41.92%; #4968/6340 (top 78.4%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Gross profit / total assets+1.95%; #3270/3702 (top 88.3%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Net income / positive book equity-49.68%; #4202/5226 (top 80.4%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.4744; #4904/5884 (top 83.3%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Positive Diluted-EPS Years1/10 years positive
✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
7 of 8 flag ABEO's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
✗Graham>= 33% growth
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 2.4x (growth N/A)
✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR
✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
Inventory Growth vs Revenue Growth
✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
EPS Growth Direction$-0.60 (2010) -> $1.01 (2025)
✓DremanPositive over recent years
EPS CAGR
✗Dreman> 5% annualized
Positive Net Income Frequency2/16 years positive
✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
3yr Median Revenue Growth88.2%
✓Ackman>= 5%
Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth
✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
5-Year EPS CAGR
✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -1346.7% -> -1536.9%
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
5-year Revenue CAGR-10.3%
✗SleepCAGR > 7%
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Cash Flow20% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
8 of 10 flag ABEO's cash flow — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +5 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$71.2M
✓BuffettPositive and growing
FCF Positive and Growing$-66.3M
✗LynchPositive and growing
Operating Cash Flow$-76.3M
✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-34.76%, ROA=32.42%
✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
✗Dreman< 8x
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=2.4x, FCF Yield=-56.5%
✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
FCF Positive0/16 years FCF positive
✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-49.8%
✗Ackman>= 4%
Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
✗Ackman<= 25
Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency2/17 years positive
✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-66.3M
✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-44.48%; #3818/4519 (top 84.5%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Valuation23% pass✓ 13✗ 15▾
10 of 13 flag ABEO's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more
Price / Book Value per Share0.8x
✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
Price / 3-yr avg EPS
✗Graham<= 15x
Price-to-Book Ratio0.8x
✓Graham<= 1.5x
P/E x P/B
✗Graham<= 22.5
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 2.4x (growth N/A)
✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
EBIT / Enterprise Value-76.6%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-76.6%, ROC=-99.2%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Price / EPS2.4x
✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
✗Dreman< 8x
Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=2.4x, OE Yield=49.4%
✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=2.4x, FCF Yield=-56.5%
✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=2.4x, P/B=0.8x
✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
✗Ackman<= 25
Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($2.42)
✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
Net income / market capitalization-41.92%; #4968/6340 (top 78.4%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.8438; #1813/6449 (top 28.1%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Price / Diluted EPS2.4x
✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.84x
✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
Book Value per Share Change+171.1%
✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
Revenue / market capitalization+0.2615; #3501/5247 (top 66.7%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-44.48%; #3818/4519 (top 84.5%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-50.71%; #5177/6202 (top 83.5%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Verdicts23% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
Split decision: 9 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 3 PASS
Overall verdict
✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #2806✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (0/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1972/2370 (Top 83.2%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag ABEO's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio5.69
✓Graham>= 2.0
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-80.6%
✗Buffett> 10%
ROIC - WACC-90.6%
✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-99.2%
✗Greenblatt> 25%
Current Ratio Change YoY6.08 -> 6.93
✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY
✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities5.69
✓Dreman> 1.5
Return on Invested Capital-41.6%
✗Munger> 15%
ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=-80.5%; FY2025: ROIC=-39.4%
✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
Reinvestment Rate x ROIC-39.4% (RR=100% x ROIC=-39.4%)
✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
ROIC (5-year)0/2 years above 12% (latest -39.4%)
✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Pharmaceutical Products

SIC Sector: Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals

Size: Micro Cap($149.2M)

Revenue: $5.8M

Net Income: $71.2M+211.7% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-1536.9%

Return on Equity44.7%

Debt / Equity0.13

Current Ratio6.93

EPS (Diluted)$1.01

Shares Retired−20.6% / −107.5% 2y

Similar Companies

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.

$364.3B

ABTABBOTT LABORATORIES

$188.0B

BMYBRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO

$129.7B

TECHBIO-TECHNE Corp

$11.4B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 20.6% of shares last year, 107.5% issued over two.

Buybacks: —
Dividends: —

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

Metric	TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-K · 2026-03-17 10-Q · 2026-05-13 10-Q · 2026-08-13 10-Q · 2026-11-09 Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.	Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-Q · 2026-11-09 Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.	Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-Q · 2026-08-13 Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.	Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources 10-Q · 2026-05-13	FY 2025 Sources 10-K · 2026-03-17	FY 2024 Sources 10-K · 2025-03-20	FY 2023 Sources 10-K · 2024-03-18	FY 2022 Sources 10-K · 2023-03-29	FY 2021 Sources 10-K · 2022-03-31
Market Cap	$149.2Mcurrent	--	--	--	$280.2Mest.	$252.9Mest.	$108.0Mest.	$19.8Mest.	$958.0Mest.
Revenue	$39.0M	$13.5M	$11.4M↑2745%	$8.7M	$5.8M	--	$3.5M↑148%	$1.4M↓53%	$3.0M
Operating Income	-$72.6M↑13%	-$13.0M↑46%	-$13.7M↑40%	-$23.0M↓17%	-$89.4M↓39%	-$64.2M↓36%	-$47.1M↑7%	-$50.9M↑43%	-$89.8M
Net Income	-$62.5M↓176%	-$4.8M↑7%	-$20.2M↓119%	-$17.1M↓42%	$71.2M↑212%	-$63.7M↓18%	-$54.2M↓37%	-$39.7M↑53%	-$84.9M
EPS (Diluted)	--	$-0.08↑20%	$-0.35↓120%	$-0.30↓25%	$1.01↑165%	$-1.55↑39%	$-2.53↑54%	$-5.53↓543%	$-0.86
Gross Margin	—	—	—	—	73.7%	—	—	—	—
Operating Margin	-186.1%	-96.4%	-120.0%↑98%	-264.1%	-1536.9%	—	-1346.7%↑63%	-3600.8%↓20%	-2994.5%
ROE	-49.7%↓203%	—	—	—	44.7%↑131%	-144.7%↑60%	-365.5%↓146%	-148.3%↑26%	-200.5%
Total Debt	$11.8M↓40%	$11.8M↓40%	$15.0M↓23%	$18.1M↓6%	$20.0M↑6%	$19.0M	--	--	--
Shareholders' Equity	$125.9M↓26%	$125.9M↓26%	$128.1M↓22%	$144.9M↑250%	$159.2M↑262%	$44.0M↑197%	$14.8M↓45%	$26.8M↓37%	$42.4M
Current Ratio	5.69↓42%	5.69↓42%	6.63↓1%	5.89↑20%	6.93↑14%	6.08↑46%	4.15↓39%	6.83↑102%	3.39
Debt / Equity	0.09↓18%	0.09↓18%	0.12↓2%	0.12↓73%	0.13↓71%	0.43	—	—	—
Operating Cash Flow	-$63.6M↑15%	-$8.3M↑61%	-$17.5M↑7%	-$19.8M↓8%	-$76.3M↓36%	-$56.0M↓51%	-$37.0M↑15%	-$43.5M↑34%	-$65.7M
Free Cash Flow	-$66.3M↑19%	-$8.5M↑64%	-$18.0M↑17%	-$20.7M↓5%	-$84.3M↓44%	-$58.5M↓57%	-$37.3M↑14%	-$43.6M↑38%	-$69.8M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products

ABEO vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$5.8MBottom 25%

Net Income$71.2MMedian

ROE44.7%Top 25%

D/E0.13Top 25%

Op. Margin-1536.9%Bottom 25%

Curr. Ratio6.93Top 25%

Company	Market Cap	Price	Revenue	Net Income	ROE	D/E	Op. Margin	Curr. Ratio	Graham	Buffett	Lynch	Greenblatt	Piotroski	Dreman
Merck & Co., Inc.MRK	$364.3B	$147.76	$65.0B	$18.3B	34.7%	0.94	—	1.54	2/9	5/9	4/7	0/3	F-Score 4	1/11
ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT	$188.0B	$108.52	$44.3B	$6.5B	12.5%	0.25	18.2%	1.58	3/9	4/9	2/7	1/3	F-Score 5	3/11
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY	$129.7B	$63.43	$48.2B	$7.1B	38.2%	2.44	19.4%	1.26	2/9	1/9	3/7	1/3	F-Score 8	5/11
BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH	$11.4B	$72.80	$1.2B	$73.4M	3.8%	—	8.4%	3.46	4/9	3/9	3/7	0/3	F-Score 5	4/11
REPLIGEN CORPRGEN	$10.7B	$167.79	$738.3M	$48.9M	2.3%	0.26	7.5%	8.37	3/9	2/9	3/7	0/3	F-Score 7	5/11
IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS	$4.8B	$29.06	$943.7M	$381.4M	-78.0%	3.60	-40.4%	3.83	3/9	1/9	1/7	0/3	F-Score 4	3/11
NEOGEN CORPNEOG	$2.5B	$11.23	$870.4M	$7.9M	-0.4%	0.76	-2.5%	3.82	3/9	1/9	2/7	0/3	F-Score 6	4/11
Pharvaris N.V.PHVS	$2.4B	$33.36	—	$206.4M	-64.8%	0.00	—	—	0/9	0/9	2/7	0/3	F-Score 2	2/11