Adient plc

ADNT
About the company

Adient plc engages in the design, development, manufacture, and market of seating systems and components for passenger cars, commercial vehicles, and light trucks in United States. Its automotive seating solutions include complete seating systems, mechanisms, frames, foams, head restraints, armrests, and trim covers.

Country: IrelandPrice: $16.00Market Cap: $1.2B

Investment snapshot

6%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 12

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$27.91

+74.4% vs price

Models with upside

4 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

ADNT undervalued: all 4 models price fair value above $16.00 (median $27.91)

Key risk

No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #1555 (Top 50.2%)NEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILFAILPASSFAILFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/A+42.9%N/AN/A+36.3%N/AN/AN/A+43.4%+42.5%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30 · TTM ended 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-11-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-11-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2025-11-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-11-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-11-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Valuation models100% pass✓ 4▾

    ADNT undervalued: all 4 models price fair value above $16.00 (median $27.91)

    Greenblatt fair value$28.01
    ✓Greenblatt+42.9% margin vs $16.00
    Munger fair value$25.12
    ✓Munger+36.3% margin vs $16.00
    Ackman fair value$28.25
    ✓Ackman+43.4% margin vs $16.00
    Templeton fair value$27.81
    ✓Templeton+42.5% margin vs $16.00
  • Cash Flow90% pass✓ 11✗ 1▾

    9 of 10 pass — Buffett objects

    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$295.0M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$449.0M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.01%, ROA=-3.14%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)2.8x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=17.0%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive6/11 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap23.3%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share6.2x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency10/11 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$295.0M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+24.65%; #225/4519 (top 5.0%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 0.4% vs Rev: 5.0%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$4.90 (2015) -> $-3.39 (2025)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR-29.9% CAGR over 9 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency5/11 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-1.0%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR-74.2% CAGR over 3 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR2.8%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-74.2% over 3 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Profitability6% pass✓ 3✗ 32▾

    15 of 16 flag ADNT's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)5/12 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)5/12 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)7.0%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE2.8%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value3.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.6%, ROC=10.6%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-3.14%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY0.19% -> -3.14% (delta: -3.33%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.01%, ROA=-3.14%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY6.3% -> 6.6%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue1.6%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity2.8%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/B=0.7x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-2.0% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency5/11 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity2.8%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR-74.2% CAGR over 3 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+4.01%; #2008/6340 (top 31.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+10.67%; #2752/3702 (top 74.3%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+2.78%; #2698/5226 (top 51.6%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0466; #2492/5884 (top 42.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-74.2% over 3 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years4/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾

    Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #1555•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1456/2370 (Top 61.4%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾

    11 of 12 flag ADNT's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.38, IC: 2.3x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity1.38
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.10
    ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.38
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels1.38
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=0.5x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1.38
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.3811; #3525/4210 (top 83.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾

    7 of 8 flag ADNT's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +4 more

    Current Ratio1.10
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)10.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.11 -> 1.12
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.57x -> 1.62x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.10
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Valuation15% pass✓ 12✗ 16▾

    11 of 13 flag ADNT's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +8 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.7x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value3.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.6%, ROC=10.6%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)2.8x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.7x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation Reasonableness
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=17.0%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.7x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share6.2x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low126% of trailing low ($12.65)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+4.01%; #2008/6340 (top 31.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.4447; #961/6449 (top 14.9%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+72.7%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+12.6387; #282/5247 (top 5.4%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+24.65%; #225/4519 (top 5.0%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-21.65%; #4053/6202 (top 65.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Automobiles and Trucks
SIC Sector: Transportation Equipment
Size: Small Cap($1.2B)
Revenue: $14.5B-1.0% YoY
Net Income: $281.0M-1661.1% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin--
Return on Equity-15.9%
Debt / Equity1.36
Current Ratio1.12
EPS (Diluted)$-3.39−90.7% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$125.0M
Buybacks (2y)$400.0M
Shares Retired6.7% / 15.5% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 6.7% of shares last year, 15.5% over two.

Buybacks
$125.0M
Dividends
—

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY24
−90.7% = −91.2% + 5.9%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow, buybacks, capex, revenue, net income, gross profit, pre tax income.

Q4 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, gross profit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, capex, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow, capex, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: interest expense, operating cash flow, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-11-18
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-11-18
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-11-17
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-11-22
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2021-11-23
Market Cap$1.2Bcurrent--------$1.6Best.$1.5Best.$3.3Best.$4.3Best.$4.0Best.
Revenue$15.2B↑4%$3.7B↑1%$3.9B↑5%$3.9B↑7%$3.6B↑4%$14.5B↓1%$14.7B↓5%$15.4B↑9%$14.1B↑3%$13.7B
Operating Income--------------------
Net Income-$17.0M↑94%-$47.0M↓361%$25.0M↓31%$27.0M↑108%-$22.0M-$281.0M↓1661%$18.0M↓91%$205.0M↑271%-$120.0M↓111%$1.1B
EPS (Diluted)----$0.32↓26%$0.34↑109%$-0.28$-3.39↓1795%$0.20↓91%$2.15↑269%$-1.27↓111%$11.58
Gross Margin6.3%↓4%6.7%6.0%↓6%6.6%↓8%6.0%↓4%6.6%↑5%6.3%↓6%6.7%↑17%5.7%↓5%6.0%
Operating Margin——————————
ROE-1.0%↑93%————-15.9%↓1986%0.8%↓91%9.2%↑259%-5.8%↓112%46.6%
Total Debt$2.4B↓2%$2.4B↓2%$2.4B$2.4B$2.4B↓1%$2.4B$2.4B↓5%$2.5B↓2%$2.6B↓30%$3.7B
Shareholders' Equity$1.6B↓7%$1.6B↓7%$1.7B↓3%$1.7B↑4%$1.7B↓8%$1.8B↓17%$2.1B↓4%$2.2B↑7%$2.1B↓13%$2.4B
Current Ratio1.09↓3%1.09↓3%1.10↓2%1.10↓1%1.09↑1%1.12↑1%1.11↓4%1.15↓3%1.19↓18%1.45
Debt / Equity1.44↑6%1.44↑6%1.38↑3%1.39↓4%1.38↑8%1.36↑20%1.13↓1%1.14↓8%1.24↓20%1.55
Operating Cash Flow$533.0M↑19%$167.0M↓22%$205.0M↑19%$81.0M↑280%$80.0M↓27%$449.0M↓17%$543.0M↓19%$667.0M↑143%$274.0M↑5%$260.0M
Free Cash Flow$222.0M↑9%$61.0M↓54%$138.0M↑20%$8.0M↑109%$15.0M↓67%$204.0M↓26%$277.0M↓33%$415.0M↑783%$47.0M$0

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Automobiles and Trucks

ADNT vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$14.5BBottom 25%
Net Income$281.0MBottom 25%
ROE-15.9%Bottom 25%
D/E1.36Bottom 25%
Op. Margin—
Curr. Ratio1.12Bottom 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
Tesla, Inc.TSLA$1.54T$390.22$94.8B$3.8B4.6%0.024.6%2.162/95/92/70/3F-Score 53/11
PACCAR INCPCAR$56.2B$106.66$28.4B$2.4B12.3%0.00——3/93/92/70/3F-Score 44/11
FORD MOTOR COF$47.6B$11.91$187.3B$8.2B-22.7%—-4.9%1.072/90/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
HONDA MOTOR CO LTDHMC$44.5B$34.30$145.0B$5.6B6.8%0.715.6%1.361/92/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INCMGA$16.0B$61.82$42.0B$829.0M6.6%0.38—1.253/92/92/70/3F-Score 63/11
BORGWARNER INCBWA$10.2B$50.89$14.3B$277.0M5.1%0.723.7%2.071/92/90/70/3F-Score 63/11
OSHKOSH CORPOSK$8.6B$141.78$10.4B$647.0M14.3%0.249.0%1.942/95/94/70/3F-Score 53/11
Aptiv PLCAPTV$7.8B$38.75$20.4B$165.0M1.8%0.825.8%1.744/90/90/73/3F-Score 85/11