Ambipar Emergency Response

AMBIQ
About the company

Ambipar Emergency Response provides environmental, emergency response and industrial field service in Brazil and internationally. The company provides emergency response and industrial field service, including response to accidents involving hazardous and non-hazardous chemical and non-chemical products and waste and natural disasters, as well as tank cleaning, silo cleaning, asbestos removal, vessel and container cleaning, waste transportation and disposal, soil remediation, turnaround, and decommissioning.

Country: BrazilPrice: $0.07Market Cap: $3.9M

Investment snapshot

41%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

6

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

2 / 8

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$10.29

+14600.0% vs price

Models with upside

5 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

AMBIQ undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $0.07 (median $10.29)

Key risk

No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictPASSFAILFAILBUY · Rank #359 (Top 11.6%)PASSPASSPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILFAILPASSFAILFAILBUYNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+98.0%N/AN/A+99.3%N/A+95.4%N/A+99.5%+99.7%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-06-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Valuation models100% pass✓ 5▾

    AMBIQ undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $0.07 (median $10.29)

    Graham fair value$3.56
    ✓Graham+98.0% margin vs $0.07
    Greenblatt fair value$10.29
    ✓Greenblatt+99.3% margin vs $0.07
    Dreman fair value$1.51
    ✓Dreman+95.4% margin vs $0.07
    Pabrai fair value$14.42
    ✓Pabrai+99.5% margin vs $0.07
    Akre fair value$22.96
    ✓Akre+99.7% margin vs $0.07

Where It Falls Short

  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 6.5% vs Rev: -1.5%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/5 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth67.5%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 20.6% -> 14.7%, operating margin 20.0% -> 15.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

    11 of 12 flag AMBIQ's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $125.9M vs NCA $124.8M
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.00, IC: 0.8x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity1
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-103.7M
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change14.33% -> 13.41%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.79
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels1
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=0.8x, D/EBITDA=1.8x
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.0031; #3231/4210 (top 76.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Profitability13% pass✓ 7✗ 28▾

    14 of 16 flag AMBIQ's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)5/6 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)3/6 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)19.2%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)15.0% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-1.4%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value36.2%
    ✓Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=36.2%, ROC=21.2%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-0.35%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-1.45% -> -0.35% (delta: +1.10%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.26%, ROA=-0.35%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY19.3% -> 14.7%
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue3.9%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-1.4%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=0.5x, P/B=0.0x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity12.3% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value95.4% (IV=$1.52 vs Price=$0.07)
    ✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/5 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue15.0%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-1.4%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend20.0% (2022) -> 15.0% (2024)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 20.6% -> 14.7%, operating margin 20.0% -> 15.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-85.75%; #5319/6340 (top 83.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+8.25%; #2919/3702 (top 78.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-1.42%; #3011/5226 (top 57.6%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0424; #2356/5884 (top 40.0%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years5/5 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Valuation38% pass✓ 18✗ 10▾

    8 of 13 flag AMBIQ's valuation — Lynch, Greenblatt, Ackman +5 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS0.7x
    ✓Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.0x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B0.00
    ✓Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value36.2%
    ✓Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=36.2%, ROC=21.2%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS0.5x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)0.1x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.0x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=0.5x, OE Yield=1259.7%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.5x
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=0.5x, P/B=0.0x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value95.4% (IV=$1.52 vs Price=$0.07)
    ✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low70000% of trailing low ($0.00)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-85.75%; #5319/6340 (top 83.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+60.4723; #70/6449 (top 1.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS0.5x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+147.8%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+135.5166; #77/5247 (top 1.5%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-69.74%; #5652/6202 (top 91.1%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾

    5 of 8 flag AMBIQ's efficiency — Graham, Greenblatt, Piotroski +2 more

    Current Ratio1.79
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)20.5%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+10.5%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)21.2%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.79 -> 1.79
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.60x -> 0.56x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.79
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital13.2%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2022: ROIC=15.8%; FY2023: ROIC=12.3%; FY2024: ROIC=13.2%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)5/5 years above 12% (latest 13.2%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾

    6 of 10 flag AMBIQ's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Marks +3 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$68.2M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.26%, ROA=-0.35%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)0.1x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.5x
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency5/5 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Verdicts47% pass✓ 7✗ 8▾

    Split decision: 8 FAIL · 5 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✓GrahamPASS (4/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (0/7)✓GreenblattRank #359✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1965/2370 (Top 82.9%))✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✓SchlossBUY (5/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2024. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Almost Nothing
SIC Sector: Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services
Size: Micro Cap($3.9M)
Revenue: $525.8M-1.5% YoY
Net Income: $3.3M+74.2% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin15.0%
Return on Equity-1.4%
Debt / Equity1.00
Current Ratio1.79
EPS (Diluted)$0.13−73.3% 1y
Shares Retired0.0%

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2024

Retired 0.0% of shares last year.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
$8.4M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY21
47.9% = 98.0% + −25.3%
FY22
−73.3% = 29.8% + −79.4%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

MetricFY 2024
Sources
  • 20-F · 2025-06-24
FY 2023
Sources
  • 20-F · 2024-05-13
FY 2022
Sources
  • 20-F · 2023-05-15
FY 2021
Sources
  • 20-F · 2023-05-15
FY 2020
Sources
  • 20-F · 2023-05-15
Market Cap$3.9Mcurrent$374.2Mest.$2.2Best.----
Revenue$525.8M↓2%$534.0M↑67%$318.8M↑116%$147.6M↑110%$70.2M
Operating Income$78.6M↑6%$74.3M↑17%$63.7M↑99%$32.0M↑85%$17.3M
Net Income-$3.3M↑74%-$12.9M↓142%$30.6M↑30%$23.5M↑98%$11.9M
EPS (Diluted)$0.13↑288%$0.03↓75%$0.14↓73%$0.51↑48%$0.34
Gross Margin14.7%↓24%19.3%↓6%20.6%↓17%24.8%↓17%29.7%
Operating Margin15.0%↑7%13.9%↓30%20.0%↓8%21.7%↓12%24.7%
ROE-1.4%↑76%-5.8%↓113%44.2%↑10%40.2%↑113%18.9%
Total Debt$235.4M↓9%$257.2M↑3%$249.4M↑643%$33.6M↑1849%$1.7M
Shareholders' Equity$234.6M↑6%$221.2M↑220%$69.1M↑18%$58.5M↓7%$63.0M
Current Ratio1.791.79↑13%1.58↑21%1.31—
Debt / Equity1.00↓14%1.16↓68%3.61↑529%0.57↑1999%0.03
Operating Cash Flow$68.2M↑322%$16.2M↓82%$89.1M↑672%$11.5M↑84%$6.3M
Free Cash Flow----------

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Almost Nothing

AMBIQ vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$525.8MBottom 25%
Net Income$3.3MBottom 25%
ROE-1.4%Bottom 25%
D/E1.00Median
Op. Margin15.0%Median
Curr. Ratio1.79Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
WASTE MANAGEMENT INCWM$97.0B$243.83$25.2B$2.7B27.1%2.2917.1%0.892/95/94/70/3F-Score 73/11
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.RSG$77.1B$252.99$19.0B$2.1B17.9%1.1317.4%0.643/93/93/71/3F-Score 63/11
Waste Connections, Inc.WCN$48.5B$193.97$9.5B$1.1B13.1%1.0718.1%0.622/92/93/70/3F-Score 73/11
GFL Environmental Inc.GFL$18.5B$41.92$4.8B$2.8B52.5%1.02—0.581/90/92/70/3F-Score 83/11
CLEAN HARBORS INCCLH$15.5B$293.81$6.0B$391.0M14.2%1.0111.2%2.331/95/94/70/3F-Score 74/11
AES CORPAES$10.6B$14.91$12.2B$910.0M22.4%0.18—0.772/91/95/71/3F-Score 46/11
CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS INCCWST$6.4B$100.20$1.8B$7.9M0.5%0.743.5%1.261/91/92/70/3F-Score 51/11
OIO GroupOIO$584.7M$1.68$6.1M$-633257.00-4.3%0.29—0.230/90/91/70/3F-Score 31/11