AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
AMTAbout the company
American Tower Corporation one of the largest global REITs, is a leading independent owner, operator and developer of multitenant communications real estate with a portfolio of over 148,000 communications sites and a highly interconnected footprint of U.S. data center facilities. American Tower Corporation was incorporated in 1995 in Delaware and is based in Massachusetts, Boston.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
6 / 9
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$70.52
-63.2% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
4 of 6 pass — Dreman and Oshaughnessy object
Key risk
AMT overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $191.64 (median $70.52)
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1171 (Top 37.8%) | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | PASS | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
| Margin of Safety | -521.2% | -53.5% | -383.7% | -171.8% | N/A | -186.0% | -89.9% | -153.7% | -127.1% | -233.3% | -51.3% | -179.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Cash Flow67% pass✓ 5✗ 2▾
4 of 6 pass — Dreman and Oshaughnessy object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$3.0B✓BuffettPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$5.5B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.65%, ROA=4.16%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)16.4x✗Dreman< 8xPositive Operating Cash Flow frequency25/25 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$4.0B✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+4.46%; #1690/4519 (top 37.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation models0% pass✗ 11▾
AMT overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $191.64 (median $70.52)
Graham fair value$30.85✗Graham-521.2% margin vs $191.64Buffett fair value$124.81✗Buffett-53.5% margin vs $191.64Lynch fair value$39.62✗Lynch-383.7% margin vs $191.64Greenblatt fair value$70.52✗Greenblatt-171.8% margin vs $191.64Dreman fair value$67.00✗Dreman-186.0% margin vs $191.64Munger fair value$100.89✗Munger-89.9% margin vs $191.64Pabrai fair value$75.53✗Pabrai-153.7% margin vs $191.64Akre fair value$84.37✗Akre-127.1% margin vs $191.64Marks fair value$57.49✗Marks-233.3% margin vs $191.64Ackman fair value$126.66✗Ackman-51.3% margin vs $191.64Templeton fair value$68.64✗Templeton-179.2% margin vs $191.64 - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾
11 of 12 flag AMT's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 10.69, IC: 3.5x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity10.69✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.35✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity10.69✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels10.69✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=3.8x, D/EBITDA=5.4x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity10.69✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-10.6861; #4154/4210 (top 98.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation8% pass✓ 2✗ 23▾
12 of 13 flag AMT's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / FFO per Share19.1x✗Graham<= 15x✗Dreman< 12x✓Ackman<= 25Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)4.84✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value3.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.9%, ROC=32.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / (CFO / Shares)16.4x✗Dreman< 8xValuation ReasonablenessP/E=35.5x, OE Yield=3.3%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/FFO or FFO YieldP/FFO=19.1x, FFO Yield=5.3%✗PabraiP/FFO < 15 or FFO Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=35.5x, P/B=24.5x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-186.0% (IV=$67.00 vs Price=$191.64)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / EPS35.5x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price vs. Trailing Low115% of trailing low ($167.35)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Price / Book Value per Share24.5x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Net income / market capitalization+3.81%; #2091/6340 (top 33.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.0396; #5056/6449 (top 78.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS35.5x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.31✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-15.0%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.1239; #4206/5247 (top 80.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+4.46%; #1690/4519 (top 37.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+6.89%; #2033/6202 (top 32.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Verdicts9% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾
Split decision: 9 FAIL · 6 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/7)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #1171•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)•DremanNEUTRAL (6/10)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (7/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)•NeffNEUTRAL (4/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #540/963 (Top 56.1%)) - Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
7 of 8 flag AMT's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Piotroski +4 more
Current Ratio0.35✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)7.1%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-2.9%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)32.9%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY0.45 -> 0.40✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.17x -> 0.17x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.35✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital9.5%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=5.7%; FY2024: ROIC=8.9%; FY2025: ROIC=9.4%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC0.0% (RR=0% x ROIC=9.4%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 9.4%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Profitability44% pass✓ 21✗ 14▾
9 of 16 flag AMT's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +6 more
Positive EPS (10 years)18/28 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)20/28 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)50.6%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)45.5% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$3.0B✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.59✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)4.84✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR7.3%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE96.2%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value3.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.9%, ROC=32.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets4.16%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY3.73% -> 4.16% (delta: +0.43%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.65%, ROA=4.16%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue35.3%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity96.2%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/FFO=19.1x✗PabraiP/FFO < 15Return on Equity57.3% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value-186.0% (IV=$67.00 vs Price=$191.64)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency20/20 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue44.8%✓Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity96.2%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR7.3% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend31.2% (2023) -> 45.5% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 31.2% -> 45.5%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+3.81%; #2091/6340 (top 33.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+96.22%; #85/5226 (top 1.6%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0079; #681/5884 (top 11.6%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR7.3% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Growth50% pass✓ 9✗ 4▾
4 of 8 pass — Graham, Lynch, Ackman +1 more object
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)4.84✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR7.3%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$0.84 (2008) -> $5.40 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR11.6% CAGR over 17 years✓Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency20/20 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth3.8%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR7.3% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 31.2% -> 45.5%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR5.8%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR7.3% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualized
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Depreciation distorts REIT earnings and book value, so FFO-based criteria replace P/E and free-cash-flow tests, and P/B tests are omitted.
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 0.2% of shares last year, 0.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $364.6M
- Dividends
- $3.2B
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $88.9Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $83.6Best. | $83.5Best. | $85.3Best. | $94.0Best. | $100.9Best. |
| Revenue | $11.0B↑5% | $2.8B↑3% | $2.7B↑5% | $2.7B↑7% | $10.6B↑5% | $10.1B↑1% | $10.0B↑4% | $9.6B↑3% | $9.4B |
| Operating Income | $4.9B↑4% | $1.3B↑3% | $1.3B↑6% | $1.2B↓1% | $4.8B↑7% | $4.5B↑45% | $3.1B↑14% | $2.7B↓13% | $3.1B |
| Net Income | $3.4B↑12% | $780.8M↓14% | $887.5M↑133% | $878.5M↑76% | $2.6B↑15% | $2.3B↑67% | $1.4B↓19% | $1.7B↓34% | $2.6B |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $1.64↓10% | $1.86↑138% | $1.84↑77% | $5.40↑12% | $4.82↑52% | $3.18↓17% | $3.82↓33% | $5.66 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 44.8%↓2% | 45.6% | 46.2%↑1% | 45.3%↓7% | 45.5%↑2% | 44.6%↑43% | 31.2%↑10% | 28.4%↓15% | 33.5% |
| ROE | 96.2%↑26% | — | — | — | 72.0%↑7% | 67.4%↑107% | 32.6%↑7% | 30.4%↓40% | 50.5% |
| Total Debt | $37.6B↑1% | $37.6B↑1% | $37.2B↓1% | $37.3B↑1% | $37.2B↑2% | $36.5B↓6% | $38.8B | $38.7B↓11% | $43.3B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $3.5B↓11% | $3.5B↓11% | $3.7B | $3.5B | $3.7B↑8% | $3.4B↓19% | $4.2B↓25% | $5.6B↑10% | $5.1B |
| Current Ratio | 0.35↓40% | 0.35↓40% | 0.35↓43% | 0.30↓45% | 0.40↓12% | 0.45↓12% | 0.51↑17% | 0.44↑6% | 0.41 |
| Debt / Equity | 10.69↑13% | 10.69↑13% | 10.00↓1% | 10.59↑2% | 10.19↓6% | 10.79↑17% | 9.24↑33% | 6.94↓18% | 8.51 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $5.7B↑9% | $1.4B↓5% | $1.5B↑16% | $1.4B↑8% | $5.5B↑3% | $5.3B↑12% | $4.7B↑28% | $3.7B↓23% | $4.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | $4.0B↑7% | $995.4M | $1.2B↑19% | $951.1M↓1% | $3.8B↑2% | $3.7B↑27% | $2.9B↑60% | $1.8B↓47% | $3.4B |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Trading
AMT vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REALTY INCOME CORPO | $56.1B | $58.82 | $5.7B | $1.1B | 2.7% | 0.63 | 16.8% | — | 2/7 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/10 |
| Ventas, Inc.VTR | $47.0B | $88.92 | $5.8B | $261.5M | 2.1% | 1.04 | 3.5% | — | 2/7 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/10 |
| RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INCRJF | $32.4B | $168.64 | $15.9B | $2.1B | 17.1% | 0.28 | — | — | 3/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| ROYAL GOLD INCRGLD | $21.7B | $256.89 | $1.0B | $466.3M | 6.5% | 0.13 | 61.9% | 3.12 | 4/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETFETHA | $19.4B | $44.02 | — | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KIMCO REALTY CORPKIM | $17.0B | $25.55 | $2.1B | $584.7M | 5.6% | 0.74 | 36.0% | — | 3/7 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/10 |
| LandBridge Co LLCLB | $5.6B | $73.15 | $199.1M | $30.1M | 8.9% | 1.65 | 59.5% | 4.87 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| Digital Turbine, Inc.APPS | $927.6M | $7.61 | $565.3M | $37.7M | -19.6% | 1.88 | 6.0% | 1.16 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 0/11 |