Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
APLSInvestment snapshot
Positive
3
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 10
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$6.42
-84.3% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1501 (Top 48.5%) | NEUTRAL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| Margin of Safety | -1029.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -535.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | -223.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 vs 2025-03-31 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Market data at 2026-04-10 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Market data at 2026-04-10 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-04-10 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-04-10 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-04-10 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio14.1x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 204.0x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value1.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.1%, ROC=24.4%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS204.0x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)115.0x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share14.1x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=204.0x✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=204.0x, FCF Yield=0.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=204.0x, P/B=14.1x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share115.8x✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+2.56%; #2528/6340 (top 39.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.0796; #4861/6449 (top 75.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS204.0x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share14.09x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+7.8%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.2120; #3722/5247 (top 70.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.86%; #2424/4519 (top 53.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models0% pass✗ 3▾
APLS overvalued: all 3 models price fair value below $40.79 (median $6.42)
Graham fair value$3.61✗Graham-1029.9% margin vs $40.79Munger fair value$6.42✗Munger-535.4% margin vs $40.79Ackman fair value$12.62✗Ackman-223.2% margin vs $40.79 - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
11 of 12 flag APLS's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.10, IC: 3.8x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity1.10✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities3.63✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.10✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels1.10✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=1.3x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity1.10✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.0990; #3320/4210 (top 78.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Profitability13% pass✓ 11✗ 24▾
14 of 16 flag APLS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/12 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/12 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-222.4%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)5.5% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 204.0x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE32.1%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value1.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.1%, ROC=24.4%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets2.08%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-22.36% -> 2.08% (delta: +24.44%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.22%, ROA=2.08%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue12.2%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity32.1%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=204.0x, P/B=14.1x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-117.4% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/11 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue14.9%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity32.1%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-130.4% (2023) -> 5.5% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -130.4% -> 5.5%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+2.56%; #2528/6340 (top 39.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+32.12%; #408/5226 (top 7.8%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.3531; #4708/5884 (top 80.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts21% pass✓ 3✗ 11▾
Split decision: 10 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 3 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #1501•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Growth25% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag APLS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 204.0x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 59.3% vs Rev: 42.5%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-8.03 (2015) -> $0.20 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/11 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth97.0%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -130.4% -> 5.5%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR32.0%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag APLS's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio3.63✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-7710.5%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-7720.5%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)24.4%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY4.25 -> 3.14✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.88x -> 0.93x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities3.63✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital15.0%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-142.1%; FY2024: ROIC=-40.5%; FY2025: ROIC=9.4%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC9.4% (RR=100% x ROIC=9.4%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 9.4%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Cash Flow30% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾
7 of 10 flag APLS's cash flow — Buffett, Dreman, Pabrai +4 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$45.0M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$45.3M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.22%, ROA=2.08%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)115.0x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=204.0x, FCF Yield=0.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive1/7 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap0.9%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share115.8x✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/11 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$45.0M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.86%; #2424/4519 (top 53.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 1.8% of shares last year, 6.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-03-31 2025-04-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.2Bcurrent | -- | $2.9Best. | $3.6Best. | $7.6Best. | $5.9Best. | $3.9Best. |
| Revenue | $1.1B↑42% | $268.3M↑61% | $1.0B↑28% | $781.4M↑97% | $396.6M↑426% | $75.4M↑13% | $66.6M |
| Operating Income | $165.2M↑189% | $26.5M↑132% | $55.4M↑134% | -$165.0M↑68% | -$517.1M↑13% | -$594.6M↓11% | -$536.3M |
| Net Income | $133.3M↑160% | $18.7M↑120% | $22.4M↑111% | -$197.9M↑63% | -$528.6M↑19% | -$652.2M↑13% | -$746.4M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.15↑120% | $0.20↑113% | $-1.60↑64% | $-4.45↑28% | $-6.15↑30% | $-8.84 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.9%↑162% | 9.9%↑120% | 5.5%↑126% | -21.1%↑84% | -130.4%↑83% | -788.4%↑2% | -805.7% |
| ROE | 32.1%↑124% | — | 6.0%↑107% | -86.6%↑68% | -271.8%↑29% | -383.9%↓2% | -375.7% |
| Total Debt | $456.0M↑388% | $456.0M↑388% | $93.7M | $93.3M | $93.0M | $92.7M↓51% | $189.0M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $414.9M↑153% | $414.9M↑153% | $370.1M↑62% | $228.5M↑17% | $194.5M↑15% | $169.9M↓14% | $198.7M |
| Current Ratio | 3.63↓11% | 3.63↓11% | 3.14↓26% | 4.25↑37% | 3.10↓28% | 4.29↓31% | 6.25 |
| Debt / Equity | 1.10↑93% | 1.10↑93% | 0.25↓38% | 0.41↓15% | 0.48↓12% | 0.55↓43% | 0.95 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $37.8M↑555% | -$61.0M↓14% | $45.3M↑152% | -$87.9M↑85% | -$594.7M↓16% | -$513.7M↑9% | -$563.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | $45.0M↑151% | -$88.3M↑85% | -$595.5M↓16% | -$515.3M↑9% | -$564.2M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
APLS vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |