Bausch Health Companies Inc.
BHCAbout the company
Bausch Health Companies Inc. operates as a diversified specialty pharmaceutical and medical device company. It operates through five segments: Salix, International, Solta Medical, Diversified, and Bausch + Lomb. The company develops, manufactures, and markets products primarily in the therapeutic areas of gastroenterology, hepatology, neurology and dermatology, generic and branded generic pharmaceuticals, dentistry products, over-the-counter products, aesthetic medical devices, and eye health.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
4 / 11
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$30.87
+269.7% vs price
Models with upside
5 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
All 10 investors pass BHC's cash flow
Key risk
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one debt & leverage criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #711 (Top 23%) | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | +73.0% | N/A | +72.8% | N/A | N/A | +72.7% | +78.7% | N/A | N/A | +85.3% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-29 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Cash Flow100% pass✓ 12▾
All 10 investors pass BHC's cash flow
Free Cash Flow Proxy$968.0M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$1.9B✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$1.4B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.31%, ROA=0.60%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)2.2x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=19.9x, FCF Yield=32.1%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive17/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap60.3%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share3.1x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency17/18 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$1.9B✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+59.68%; #87/4519 (top 1.9%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models100% pass✓ 5▾
BHC undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $8.35 (median $30.87)
Buffett fair value$30.87✓Buffett+73.0% margin vs $8.35Greenblatt fair value$30.71✓Greenblatt+72.8% margin vs $8.35Munger fair value$30.54✓Munger+72.7% margin vs $8.35Pabrai fair value$39.18✓Pabrai+78.7% margin vs $8.35Ackman fair value$56.77✓Ackman+85.3% margin vs $8.35
Where It Falls Short
- Debt & Leverage0% pass✓ 2✗ 13▾
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one debt & leverage criterion
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $19.8B vs NCA $2.7B✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: N/A (negative equity), IC: 0.8x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / EquityN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-17.3B✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change71.42% -> 78.10%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.56✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt LevelsN/A (non-positive equity)✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=0.8x, D/EBITDA=8.6x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Profitability6% pass✓ 8✗ 27▾
15 of 16 flag BHC's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)6/18 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)7/18 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-92.0%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)17.7% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$968.0M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROEN/A (negative equity)✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value5.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.9%, ROC=39.6%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets0.60%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-0.17% -> 0.60% (delta: +0.77%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.31%, ROA=0.60%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-3.2%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=19.9x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-141.5% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency7/18 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue11.2%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend11.0% (2023) -> 17.7% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 11.0% -> 17.7%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-26.91%; #4739/6340 (top 74.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0138; #1070/5884 (top 18.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR36.8% over 3 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years2/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts8% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾
Split decision: 11 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #711•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Valuation23% pass✓ 5✗ 23▾
10 of 13 flag BHC's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value5.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.9%, ROC=39.6%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS19.9x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)2.2x✓Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per ShareN/A (negative BVPS)✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=19.9x, OE Yield=31.3%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=19.9x, FCF Yield=32.1%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=19.9x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share3.1x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low184% of trailing low ($4.53)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-26.91%; #4739/6340 (top 74.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization-0.4249; #5928/6449 (top 91.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS19.9x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-199.4%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+3.5560; #702/5247 (top 13.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+59.68%; #87/4519 (top 1.9%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+49.11%; #669/6202 (top 10.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth25% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag BHC's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +3 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -0.4% vs Rev: 10.8%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency7/18 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth7.8%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 11.0% -> 17.7%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR5.0%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR36.8% over 3 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾
5 of 8 flag BHC's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Munger +2 more
Current Ratio1.56✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)4.2%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-5.8%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)39.6%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY0.86 -> 1.47✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.36x -> 0.39x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.56✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital5.1%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=3.6%; FY2024: ROIC=6.0%; FY2025: ROIC=7.1%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC7.1% (RR=100% x ROIC=7.1%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 7.1%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.7% of shares last year, 1.4% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.1Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $2.1Best. | $2.7Best. | $2.9Best. | $2.8Best. | $8.8Best. |
| Revenue | $11.1B↑11% | $2.9B↑10% | $2.9B↑13% | $2.5B↑12% | $10.3B↑7% | $9.6B↑10% | $8.8B↑8% | $8.1B↓4% | $8.4B |
| Operating Income | $1.2B↓34% | $983.0M↑59% | $740.0M↑67% | -$950.0M↓444% | $1.8B↑17% | $1.5B↑61% | $963.0M↑112% | $454.0M↑1% | $450.0M |
| Net Income | -$841.0M↓332% | $436.0M↑144% | $258.0M↑74% | -$1.4B↓2353% | $157.0M↑441% | -$46.0M↑92% | -$592.0M↓163% | -$225.0M↑76% | -$948.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $1.15↑140% | $0.68↑70% | $-3.82↓2287% | $0.42↑423% | $-0.13↑92% | $-1.62↓161% | $-0.62↑77% | $-2.64 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2%↓41% | 33.4%↑45% | 25.9%↑48% | -37.6%↓408% | 17.7%↑10% | 16.1%↑46% | 11.0%↑97% | 5.6%↑5% | 5.3% |
| ROE | 63.3%↑199% | — | — | — | -28.3%↓888% | 3.6%↓94% | 57.9%↑78% | 32.5%↓96% | 894.3% |
| Total Debt | $20.6B↓2% | $20.6B↓2% | $20.7B↓5% | $20.8B↓3% | $20.8B↓4% | $21.6B↓3% | $22.4B↑8% | $20.8B↓8% | $22.7B |
| Shareholders' Equity | -$1.3B↓135% | -$1.3B↓135% | -$1.8B↓132% | -$2.1B↓74% | -$554.0M↑57% | -$1.3B↓25% | -$1.0B↓48% | -$692.0M↓553% | -$106.0M |
| Current Ratio | 1.56↑20% | 1.56↑20% | 1.44↑10% | 1.32↓2% | 1.47↑72% | 0.86↓34% | 1.30↑21% | 1.08 | 1.08 |
| Debt / Equity | -15.54↑58% | -15.54↑58% | -11.71↑59% | -10.08↑45% | -37.58↓122% | -16.90↑23% | -21.91↑27% | -30.01↑86% | -213.72 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $2.2B↑47% | $814.0M↑101% | $670.0M↑132% | $230.0M↑9% | $1.4B↓12% | $1.6B↑55% | $1.0B↑242% | -$728.0M↓151% | $1.4B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.9B↑70% | $748.0M↑138% | $593.0M↑212% | $121.0M↑26% | $1.0B↓20% | $1.3B↑54% | $817.0M↑186% | -$946.0M↓182% | $1.2B |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
BHC vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |