BUDA JUICE, INC.

BUDA
About the company

Buda Juice, Inc. engages in producing and distributing juice, lemonades, limeades, and wellness shots in the United States. The company offers clean-label beverages; citrus juices; and cold-pressed juices made from fruits and vegetables. The company serves wholesale clients. The company was incorporated in 2013 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Country: United StatesPrice: $5.99Market Cap: $75.4M

Investment snapshot

29%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

4

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 9

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$3.20

-46.6% vs price

Models with upside

1 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

11 of 12 pass — Buffett objects

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILBUY · Rank #445 (Top 14.4%)PASSFAILNEUTRALFAILBUYFAILPASSFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-416.4%-80.4%N/A-177.3%N/A-99.7%-60.6%-40.6%-87.2%-99.7%+8.5%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2026-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2026-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-14

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2026-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-03-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage92% pass✓ 14✗ 1▾

    11 of 12 pass — Buffett objects

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $0.8M vs NCA $20.1M
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: N/A
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.03
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$18.1M
    ✓LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities15.21
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.03
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.03
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=N/A (no interest expense), D/EBITDA=0.0x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.03
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0349; #894/4210 (top 21.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency75% pass✓ 9✗ 2▾

    6 of 8 pass — Piotroski and Akre object

    Current Ratio15.21
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)171.0%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+161.0%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)194.9%
    ✓Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY4.69 -> 5.50
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY3.02x -> 2.54x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities15.21
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital72.9%
    ✓Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=83.0%; FY2025: ROIC=72.9%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC72.9% (RR=100% x ROIC=72.9%)
    ✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)2/2 years above 12% (latest 72.9%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation0% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾

    No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Net income / market capitalization+4.68%; #1782/6340 (top 28.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS29.9x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio20.1x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B603.10
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 29.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value4.7%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=4.7%, ROC=194.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS29.9x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)23.9x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share20.1x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=29.9x, OE Yield=4.7%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=29.9x, FCF Yield=3.9%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=29.9x, P/B=20.1x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-99.7% (IV=$3.00 vs Price=$5.99)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share25.9x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($5.99)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.2869; #3749/6449 (top 58.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS29.9x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share20.14x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.1672; #3948/5247 (top 75.2%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.85%; #1830/4519 (top 40.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-42.29%; #4897/6202 (top 79.0%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models11% pass✓ 1✗ 8▾

    Models split on BUDA at $5.99 — fair values range $1.16–$6.55

    Graham fair value$1.16
    ✗Graham-416.4% margin vs $5.99
    Buffett fair value$3.32
    ✗Buffett-80.4% margin vs $5.99
    Greenblatt fair value$2.16
    ✗Greenblatt-177.3% margin vs $5.99
    Dreman fair value$3.00
    ✗Dreman-99.7% margin vs $5.99
    Munger fair value$3.73
    ✗Munger-60.6% margin vs $5.99
    Pabrai fair value$4.26
    ✗Pabrai-40.6% margin vs $5.99
    Akre fair value$3.20
    ✗Akre-87.2% margin vs $5.99
    Marks fair value$3.00
    ✗Marks-99.7% margin vs $5.99
    Ackman fair value$6.55
    ✓Ackman+8.5% margin vs $5.99
  • Profitability13% pass✓ 11✗ 24▾

    14 of 16 flag BUDA's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

    Net income / market capitalization+4.68%; #1782/6340 (top 28.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive EPS (10 years)2/3 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)2/3 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)103.9%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$3.5M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 29.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR0.0%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE94.5%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value4.7%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=4.7%, ROC=194.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets71.09%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY95.79% -> 71.09% (delta: -24.71%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=63.38%, ROA=71.09%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY46.2% -> 44.6%
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity94.5%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=29.9x, P/B=20.1x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity103.9% (3-yr avg)
    ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-99.7% (IV=$3.00 vs Price=$5.99)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency2/2 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue27.4%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity94.5%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Gross profit / total assets+113.26%; #114/3702 (top 3.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+94.52%; #89/5226 (top 1.7%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾

    7 of 8 flag BUDA's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 29.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR0.0%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -7.0% vs Rev: 11.8%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency2/2 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth11.8%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency0/1 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Cash Flow30% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾

    7 of 10 flag BUDA's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +4 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$3.5M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$2.9M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$3.1M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=63.38%, ROA=71.09%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)23.9x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=29.9x, FCF Yield=3.9%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive2/2 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap3.9%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share25.9x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency2/2 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$2.9M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.85%; #1830/4519 (top 40.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Verdicts36% pass✓ 5✗ 9▾

    Split decision: 9 FAIL · 3 PASS · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✓GreenblattRank #445✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)•MungerNEUTRAL (3/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✓AkreBUY (5/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Beer & Liquor
SIC Sector: Food Products
Size: Micro Cap($75.4M)
Revenue: $12.6M+11.8% YoY
Net Income: $3.5M-1.1% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin27.4%
Return on Equity94.5%
Debt / Equity0.00
Current Ratio5.50
EPS (Diluted)$0.20+0.0% 1y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Share retirement not available for this company.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
—

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY25
0.0% = −1.1% + 1.2%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricQ3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-26
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-26
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-26
Market Cap$75.4Mcurrent----$124.4Mest.----
Revenue$5.2M$4.5M$3.5M$12.6M↑12%$11.3M--
Operating Income$996.0K$444.0K$593.0K$3.4M↑1%$3.4M--
Net Income$866.0K$470.0K$388.0K$3.5M↓1%$3.6M--
EPS (Diluted)$0.07$0.04$0.03$0.20$0.20--
Gross Margin40.8%36.6%39.5%44.6%↓3%46.2%—
Operating Margin19.1%9.8%16.9%27.4%↓10%30.3%—
ROE———94.5%↓17%113.2%—
Total Debt$652.0K$755.0K$792.0K$0↓100%$89.0K--
Shareholders' Equity$22.9M$21.6M$21.0M$3.7M↑18%$3.2M↑687%$401.0K
Current Ratio15.5215.2120.165.50↑17%4.69—
Debt / Equity0.030.030.040.00↓100%0.03—
Operating Cash Flow$710.0K-$365.0K$1.3M$3.1M↓21%$4.0M--
Free Cash Flow----$1.1M$2.9M↓12%$3.3M--

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Beer & Liquor

BUDA vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$12.6MBottom 25%
Net Income$3.5MBottom 25%
ROE94.5%Top 25%
D/E0.00Top 25%
Op. Margin27.4%Top 25%
Curr. Ratio5.50Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
COCA COLA COKO$427.0B$99.25$47.9B$13.1B40.7%1.3728.7%1.463/96/94/71/3F-Score 73/11
PEPSICO INCPEP$198.2B$145.44$93.9B$8.2B40.4%2.4112.2%0.854/96/93/71/3F-Score 56/11
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NVBUD$167.0B$84.81$59.3B$6.8B7.8%0.8426.0%0.721/91/93/71/3F-Score 72/11
DIAGEO PLCDEO$56.6B$101.59$28.0B$2.5B22.9%2.1415.5%1.631/94/92/71/3F-Score 45/11
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.KDP$49.5B$36.34$16.6B$2.1B8.1%0.6321.5%0.642/92/92/71/3F-Score 62/11
AMBEV S.A.ABEV$42.5B$2.76$16.1B$2.8B17.6%0.0426.4%0.961/95/96/73/3F-Score 64/11
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.STZ$24.6B$145.61$9.1B$1.7B20.9%1.2729.8%1.081/92/92/71/3F-Score 55/11
BROWN FORMAN CORPBF-B$14.1B$30.65$3.9B$715.0M17.8%0.6125.5%3.245/96/92/71/3F-Score 75/11