CALIX, INC
CALXAbout the company
Calix, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of cloud and software platforms, and systems and services in the United States, rest of Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. The company cloud and software platforms, and systems and services enable broadband service providers (BSPs) to provide a range of services.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 11
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$3.22
-90.0% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1742 (Top 56.2%) | BUY | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
| Margin of Safety | -267.7% | -899.1% | N/A | -22878.6% | N/A | -2697.4% | -0.3% | -1584.3% | N/A | -990.5% | +49.0% | -147.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-26 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-26 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-26 vs 2025-09-27 · TTM ended 2026-09-26 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-26 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-26 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-26 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-26 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-20 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-26 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-26 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-26 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-26 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-26 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-03 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Growth0% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 123.7x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-13.6%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 74.0% vs Rev: 22.9%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-6.48 (2009) -> $0.26 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR-13.6% CAGR over 5 years✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency5/17 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth19.8%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR-13.6% CAGR over 5 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 49.9% -> 56.8%, operating margin 2.5% -> 2.1%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR13.1%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-13.6% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Profitability6% pass✓ 7✗ 28▾
15 of 16 flag CALX's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)5/18 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)5/18 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)10.1%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)2.1% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$17.9M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 123.7x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-13.6%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE6.6%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value1.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.1%, ROC=5.0%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets1.69%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-3.17% -> 1.69% (delta: +4.86%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=12.75%, ROA=1.69%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY54.6% -> 56.8%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue6.1%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity6.6%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=123.7x, P/B=2.5x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity0.8% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value-2697.4% (IV=$1.15 vs Price=$32.17)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency5/17 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue5.3%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity6.6%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR-13.6% CAGR over 5 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend2.5% (2023) -> 2.1% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 49.9% -> 56.8%, operating margin 2.5% -> 2.1%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+2.30%; #2626/6340 (top 41.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+69.40%; #348/3702 (top 9.4%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+6.56%; #2274/5226 (top 43.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.1250; #3751/5884 (top 63.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-13.6% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years5/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
11 of 12 flag CALX's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities3.04✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation8% pass✓ 3✗ 25▾
12 of 13 flag CALX's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS419.6x✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio2.5x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B1,030.7✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 123.7x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value1.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.1%, ROC=5.0%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS123.7x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)15.6x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share2.5x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=123.7x, OE Yield=0.8%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=123.7x, FCF Yield=5.8%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=123.7x, P/B=2.5x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-2697.4% (IV=$1.15 vs Price=$32.17)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share18.3x✓Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($32.17)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+2.30%; #2626/6340 (top 41.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.3509; #3459/6449 (top 53.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS123.7x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share2.84x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+191.0%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.5771; #2430/5247 (top 46.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.13%; #2016/4519 (top 44.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-32.60%; #4521/6202 (top 72.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation models11% pass✓ 1✗ 8▾
Models split on CALX at $32.17 — fair values range $0.14–$63.08
Graham fair value$8.75✗Graham-267.7% margin vs $32.17Buffett fair value$3.22✗Buffett-899.1% margin vs $32.17Greenblatt fair value$0.14✗Greenblatt-22878.6% margin vs $32.17Dreman fair value$1.15✗Dreman-2697.4% margin vs $32.17Munger fair value$32.08✗Munger-0.3% margin vs $32.17Pabrai fair value$1.91✗Pabrai-1584.3% margin vs $32.17Marks fair value$2.95✗Marks-990.5% margin vs $32.17Ackman fair value$63.08✓Ackman+49.0% margin vs $32.17Templeton fair value$13.02✗Templeton-147.1% margin vs $32.17 - Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾
Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (0/7)✗GreenblattRank #1742✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag CALX's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio3.04✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-13.3%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-23.3%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)5.0%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY4.46 -> 4.24✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.89x -> 0.94x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities3.04✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
5 of 10 pass — Lynch, Dreman, Pabrai +2 more object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$17.9M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$62.2M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$135.0M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=12.75%, ROA=1.69%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)15.6x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=123.7x, FCF Yield=5.8%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive12/17 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap2.9%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share18.3x✓Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency15/17 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$62.2M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.13%; #2016/4519 (top 44.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 1.6% of shares last year, 0.3% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $93.6M
- Dividends
- —
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-26 2025-09-28 – 2026-09-26 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-06-28 – 2026-09-26 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-03-29 – 2026-06-27 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-28 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.0Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $2.9Best. | $2.6Best. | $2.2Best. | $3.5Best. | $3.2Best. |
| Revenue | $1.1B↑23% | $301.7M↑14% | $293.3M↑21% | $280.0M↑27% | $1.0B↑20% | $831.5M↓20% | $1.0B↑20% | $867.8M↑28% | $679.4M |
| Operating Income | $60.4M↑958% | $16.6M↓5% | $21.8M↑5488% | $12.7M↑309% | $21.0M↑149% | -$43.0M↓268% | $25.6M↓51% | $52.6M↓29% | $73.9M |
| Net Income | $45.8M↑731% | $10.2M↓35% | $17.1M↑8698% | $11.2M↑334% | $17.9M↑160% | -$29.7M↓201% | $29.3M↓28% | $41.0M↓83% | $238.4M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.16↓27% | $0.26 | $0.16↑329% | $0.26↑158% | $-0.45↓207% | $0.42↓30% | $0.60↓83% | $3.51 |
| Gross Margin | 55.6%↓1% | 53.3%↓7% | 54.6%↓3% | 56.9%↑2% | 56.8%↑4% | 54.6%↑9% | 49.9%↓1% | 50.2%↓4% | 52.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3%↑799% | 5.5%↓16% | 7.4%↑4508% | 4.5%↑264% | 2.1%↑141% | -5.2%↓310% | 2.5%↓59% | 6.1%↓44% | 10.9% |
| ROE | 6.6%↑844% | — | — | — | 2.1%↑155% | -3.8%↓193% | 4.1%↓32% | 6.0%↓86% | 41.9% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $697.7M↓15% | $697.7M↓15% | $710.0M↓8% | $738.0M↓4% | $859.2M↑10% | $780.9M↑9% | $719.0M↑6% | $679.6M↑20% | $568.4M |
| Current Ratio | 3.04↓39% | 3.04↓39% | 2.83↓38% | 3.29↓28% | 4.24↓5% | 4.46↑40% | 3.19↓4% | 3.31↑4% | 3.19 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | $83.5M↓20% | $6.3M↓80% | $16.5M↓58% | $14.6M↓15% | $135.0M↑97% | $68.4M↑22% | $56.3M↑107% | $27.2M↓52% | $56.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | $62.2M↓27% | $3.4M↓87% | $11.9M↓67% | $6.5M↓49% | $115.5M↑129% | $50.3M↑31% | $38.4M↑193% | $13.1M↓72% | $46.3M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Communication
CALX vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INCVZ | $192.1B | $46.36 | $138.2B | $17.2B | 16.2% | 1.50 | 21.2% | 0.91 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 6/11 |
| AT&T INC.T | $149.4B | $22.18 | $125.6B | $22.0B | 17.4% | 1.08 | 19.2% | 0.91 | 5/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORPNTTYY | $85.0B | $26.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 6/11 |
| AMERICA MOVIL SAB DE CV/AMX | $76.0B | $25.47 | $42.1B | $1.1B | 6.2% | 1.54 | 20.7% | 0.72 | 1/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/11 |
| VODAFONE GROUP PUBLIC LTD COVOD | $35.6B | $15.37 | $40.5B | $4.5B | -7.9% | 1.01 | -1.1% | — | 1/9 | 2/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/CHTR | $24.8B | $138.39 | $54.8B | $5.0B | 31.1% | 5.90 | 23.6% | 0.39 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| BCE INCBCE | $20.0B | $21.43 | $17.9B | $4.8B | 28.3% | 1.52 | — | 0.58 | 4/9 | 1/9 | 5/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 9/11 |
| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INCRCI | $18.0B | $33.24 | $15.9B | $5.0B | 38.8% | 2.25 | 45.2% | 0.61 | 5/9 | 5/9 | 5/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 4 | 8/11 |