C4 Therapeutics, Inc.

CCCC
About the company

C4 Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, develops novel therapeutic candidates to degrade disease-causing proteins. Its lead product candidate is Cemsidomide, an orally bioavailable monodac targeting IKZF1 and IKZF3, or IKZF1/3 to address a need across multiple lines of therapy in multiple myeloma, which has competed its phase 1.

Country: United StatesPrice: $2.76Market Cap: $362.4M

Investment snapshot

6%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

2 / 13

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

—

No comparable estimates

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2662 (Top 86%)PASSFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-26

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-05

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Valuation0% pass✓ 4✗ 24▾

      No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

      Price / Book Value per Share1.0x
      ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Price / 3-yr avg EPS
      ✗Graham<= 15x
      Price-to-Book Ratio1.0x
      ✓Graham<= 1.5x
      P/E x P/B
      ✗Graham<= 22.5
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise Value-40.0%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-40.0%, ROC=-74.2%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / EPS
      ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-38.5%
      ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-27.4%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=1.0x
      ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic Value
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Price vs. Trailing Low221% of trailing low ($1.25)
      ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Net income / market capitalization-25.13%; #4700/6340 (top 74.1%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.6295; #2429/6449 (top 37.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
      ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share1.05x
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change
      ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization+0.0891; #4391/5247 (top 83.7%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-22.00%; #3547/4519 (top 78.5%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+8.88%; #1920/6202 (top 31.0%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾

      No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion

      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-103.6M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      FCF Positive and Growing$-99.3M
      ✗LynchPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$-98.7M
      ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-27.49%, ROA=-29.24%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-27.4%
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      FCF Positive1/7 years FCF positive
      ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
      (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-29.6%
      ✗Ackman>= 4%
      Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/7 years positive
      ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-79.7M
      ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-22.00%; #3547/4519 (top 78.5%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾

      No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
      ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction
      ✗DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR
      ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency0/7 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth1.0%
      ✗Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency
      ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -669.8% -> -320.5%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR
      ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾

      Split decision: 13 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #2662✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
    • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

      11 of 12 flag CCCC's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

      LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
      ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest Coverage
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt
      ✗LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
      ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities5.17
      ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity
      ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      Debt Levels
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA
      ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity
      ✗Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    • Profitability13% pass✓ 5✗ 30▾

      14 of 16 flag CCCC's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

      Positive EPS (10 years)0/8 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/8 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-41.9%
      ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-320.5% (latest)
      ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-103.6M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
      ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE-39.9%
      ✗Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise Value-40.0%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-40.0%, ROC=-74.2%
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets-29.24%
      ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY-30.12% -> -29.24% (delta: +0.88%)
      ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-27.49%, ROA=-29.24%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-291.7%
      ✗Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-39.9%
      ✗Dreman> 12%
      Margin of SafetyP/B=1.0x
      ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
      Return on Equity-47.8% (3-yr avg)
      ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic Value
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency0/7 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue-315.9%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity-39.9%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend-669.8% (2023) -> -320.5% (2025)
      ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -669.8% -> -320.5%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Net income / market capitalization-25.13%; #4700/6340 (top 74.1%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Gross profit / total assets
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity-39.92%; #4081/5226 (top 78.1%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0619; #2855/5884 (top 48.5%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years0/7 years positive
      ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

      6 of 8 flag CCCC's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

      Current Ratio5.17
      ✓Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-48.4%
      ✗Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC-58.4%
      ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-74.2%
      ✗Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY5.71 -> 7.81
      ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.10x -> 0.10x
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities5.17
      ✓Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital
      ✗Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-44.6%; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
      ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)0/3 years above 12% (latest -44.6%)
      ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Pharmaceutical Products
    SIC Sector: Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals
    Size: Small Cap($362.4M)
    Revenue: $35.9M+1.0% YoY
    Net Income: $105.0M+0.3% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin-320.5%
    Return on Equity-40.9%
    Debt / Equity--
    Current Ratio7.81
    EPS (Diluted)$-1.27
    Buybacks (1y)$193.0K
    Buybacks (2y)$387.0K

    Shareholder Return

    Fiscal 2025

    Share retirement not available for this company.

    Buybacks
    $193.0K
    Dividends
    —

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

    MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

    2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, capex, buybacks, depreciation amortization.

    Q3 FY 2026

    2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

    Q2 FY 2026

    2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, buybacks.

    Q1 FY 2026

    2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

    Sources
    FY 2025
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2026-02-26
    FY 2024
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2025-02-27
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2024-02-22
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-02-23
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-02-23
    Market Cap$362.4Mcurrent------$185.4Mest.$246.3Mest.$373.7Mest.$382.1Mest.$1.2Best.
    Revenue$32.3M$8.5M↓25%$6.6M↑3%$6.2M↓15%$35.9M↑1%$35.6M↑71%$20.8M↓33%$31.1M↓32%$45.8M
    Operating Income-$101.9M-$24.6M↑29%-$26.4M↑7%-$27.8M↑5%-$115.2M↑4%-$119.6M↑14%-$139.0M↓7%-$129.5M↓58%-$82.1M
    Net Income-$91.1M-$21.8M↑32%-$23.6M↑9%-$25.1M↑5%-$105.0M-$105.3M↑21%-$132.5M↓3%-$128.2M↓53%-$83.9M
    EPS (Diluted)--$-0.16↑64%$-0.18↑51%$-0.20↑46%$-1.27↑16%$-1.52↑43%$-2.67↓2%$-2.62↓44%$-1.82
    Gross Margin—————————
    Operating Margin-315.9%-290.5%↑5%-397.9%↑10%-451.6%↓12%-320.5%↑5%-336.1%↑50%-669.8%↓61%-416.6%↓132%-179.4%
    ROE-39.9%———-40.9%↑16%-48.8%↑9%-53.8%↓21%-44.3%↓106%-21.5%
    Total Debt------------$0↓100%$11.5M↑7%$10.8M
    Shareholders' Equity$228.2M$228.2M↑48%$247.3M↑42%$234.2M↑20%$256.6M↑19%$216.0M↓12%$246.1M↓15%$289.2M↓26%$389.6M
    Current Ratio5.175.17↓10%5.45↑8%9.00↑58%7.81↑37%5.71↓10%6.34↓2%6.46↑2%6.36
    Debt / Equity——————0.00↓100%0.04↑44%0.03
    Operating Cash Flow-$79.6M-$26.0M↑17%-$1.6M↑87%-$29.9M↑10%-$98.7M↓51%-$65.2M↑39%-$106.8M↓1%-$105.9M↓22%-$87.0M
    Free Cash Flow-$79.7M-$26.0M↑18%-$1.6M-$30.0M-$99.3M↓52%-$65.3M↑40%-$108.5M↑3%-$111.4M↓26%-$88.2M

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products

    CCCC vs Peers — Financial Grading

    Revenue$35.9MBottom 25%
    Net Income$105.0MBottom 25%
    ROE-40.9%Bottom 25%
    D/E—
    Op. Margin-320.5%Bottom 25%
    Curr. Ratio7.81Top 25%
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    Merck & Co., Inc.MRK$364.3B$147.76$65.0B$18.3B34.7%0.94—1.542/95/94/70/3F-Score 41/11
    ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT$188.0B$108.52$44.3B$6.5B12.5%0.2518.2%1.583/94/92/71/3F-Score 53/11
    BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY$129.7B$63.43$48.2B$7.1B38.2%2.4419.4%1.262/91/93/71/3F-Score 85/11
    BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH$11.4B$72.80$1.2B$73.4M3.8%—8.4%3.464/93/93/70/3F-Score 54/11
    REPLIGEN CORPRGEN$10.7B$167.79$738.3M$48.9M2.3%0.267.5%8.373/92/93/70/3F-Score 75/11
    IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS$4.8B$29.06$943.7M$381.4M-78.0%3.60-40.4%3.833/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
    NEOGEN CORPNEOG$2.5B$11.23$870.4M$7.9M-0.4%0.76-2.5%3.823/91/92/70/3F-Score 64/11
    Pharvaris N.V.PHVS$2.4B$33.36—$206.4M-64.8%0.00——0/90/92/70/3F-Score 22/11