CAMECO CORP

CCJ
About the company

Cameco Corporation provides uranium for the generation of electricity in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. It operates in three segments: Uranium, Fuel Services, and Westinghouse. The Uranium segment engages in the exploration for, mining, milling, purchase, and sale of uranium concentrate. Its Fuel Services segment is involved in the refining, conversion, and fabrication of uranium concentrate, as well as purchase and sale of conversion services.

Price: $70.73Market Cap: $30.8B

Investment snapshot

24%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

4

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

5 / 7

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$9.42

-86.7% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

10 of 12 pass — Lynch and Asness object

Key risk

CCJ overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $70.73 (median $9.42)

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILBUYFAIL · Rank #1609 (Top 52%)BUYPASSPASSFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALNEUTRALNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALNEUTRALFAIL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-341.5%-505.6%-187.1%-1046.4%N/A-650.8%-214.9%-719.6%-810.3%-2740.6%-9.5%-1179.0%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-03-19

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage83% pass✓ 13✗ 2▾

    10 of 12 pass — Lynch and Asness object

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $727.5M vs NCA $1.1B
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.14, IC: 11.8x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.14
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-139.1M
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change10.05% -> 9.67%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.47
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.14
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.14
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=11.8x, D/EBITDA=1.1x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.14
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1443; #1480/4210 (top 35.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Cash Flow60% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

    6 of 10 pass — Dreman, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$430.5M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$785.3M
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$1.0B
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=13.67%, ROA=5.72%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)29.9x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=71.8x, FCF Yield=2.5%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive9/10 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap2.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share39.2x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency10/10 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$785.3M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+2.55%; #2139/4519 (top 47.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation models0% pass✗ 11▾

    CCJ overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $70.73 (median $9.42)

    Graham fair value$16.02
    ✗Graham-341.5% margin vs $70.73
    Buffett fair value$11.68
    ✗Buffett-505.6% margin vs $70.73
    Lynch fair value$24.64
    ✗Lynch-187.1% margin vs $70.73
    Greenblatt fair value$6.17
    ✗Greenblatt-1046.4% margin vs $70.73
    Dreman fair value$9.42
    ✗Dreman-650.8% margin vs $70.73
    Munger fair value$22.46
    ✗Munger-214.9% margin vs $70.73
    Pabrai fair value$8.63
    ✗Pabrai-719.6% margin vs $70.73
    Akre fair value$7.77
    ✗Akre-810.3% margin vs $70.73
    Marks fair value$2.49
    ✗Marks-2740.6% margin vs $70.73
    Ackman fair value$64.60
    ✗Ackman-9.5% margin vs $70.73
    Templeton fair value$5.53
    ✗Templeton-1179.0% margin vs $70.73
  • Valuation8% pass✓ 3✗ 25▾

    12 of 13 flag CCJ's valuation — Graham, Greenblatt, Dreman +9 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS112.6x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio6.1x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B687.80
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.87
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value1.5%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.5%, ROC=15.1%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS71.8x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)29.9x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share6.1x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=71.8x, OE Yield=1.3%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=71.8x, FCF Yield=2.5%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=71.8x, P/B=6.1x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-650.5% (IV=$9.42 vs Price=$70.73)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share39.2x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low172% of trailing low ($41.16)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+1.40%; #2881/6340 (top 45.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.1636; #4394/6449 (top 68.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS71.8x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E1.15
    ✓Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share6.11x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+18.0%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.0825; #4416/5247 (top 84.2%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+2.55%; #2139/4519 (top 47.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-39.05%; #4771/6202 (top 76.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Profitability13% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾

    14 of 16 flag CCJ's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)6/11 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)6/11 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)3.3%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)17.8% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$430.5M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)2.36
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.87
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR82.4%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE8.5%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value1.5%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.5%, ROC=15.1%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets5.72%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY1.73% -> 5.72% (delta: +3.99%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=13.67%, ROA=5.72%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY25.0% -> 27.9%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue22.3%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity8.5%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=71.8x, P/B=6.1x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity5.7% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-650.5% (IV=$9.42 vs Price=$70.73)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency6/10 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue17.8%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity8.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR82.4% CAGR over 3 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend10.9% (2023) -> 17.8% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 21.7% -> 27.9%, operating margin 10.9% -> 17.8%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+1.40%; #2881/6340 (top 45.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+9.42%; #2842/3702 (top 76.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+8.54%; #2029/5226 (top 38.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0240; #1648/5884 (top 28.0%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR82.4% over 3 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years6/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Verdicts33% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾

    Split decision: 7 FAIL · 5 NEUTRAL · 2 BUY · 2 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✓LynchBUY (5/7)✗GreenblattRank #1609✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)✓DremanPASS (6/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1563/2370 (Top 65.9%))•NeffNEUTRAL (4/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #945/963 (Top 98.1%))
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾

    5 of 8 flag CCJ's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Munger +2 more

    Current Ratio2.47
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)2.6%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-7.4%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)15.1%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.62 -> 2.47
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.32x -> 0.34x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.47
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital6.2%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=2.8%; FY2024: ROIC=5.3%; FY2025: ROIC=6.2%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC5.1% (RR=82% x ROIC=6.2%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 6.2%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Growth50% pass✓ 9✗ 4▾

    4 of 8 pass — Graham, Marks, Sleep +1 more object

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.87
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR82.4%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 7.0% vs Rev: 16.4%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$-0.12 (2016) -> $0.99 (2025)
    ✓DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR18.1% CAGR over 7 years
    ✓Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency6/10 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth16.4%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR82.4% CAGR over 3 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 21.7% -> 27.9%, operating margin 10.9% -> 17.8%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR12.5%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR82.4% over 3 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Non-Metallic Mining
SIC Sector: Metal Mining
Size: Large Cap($30.8B)
Revenue: $2.5B+16.4% YoY
Net Income: $430.5M+259.5% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin17.8%
Return on Equity8.5%
Debt / Equity0.14
Current Ratio2.47
EPS (Diluted)$0.99+262.7% 1y
Shares Retired−0.0% / −0.3% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 0.0% of shares last year, 0.3% issued over two.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
$76.3M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY23
286.5% = 313.6% + −6.5%
FY24
−56.7% = −56.1% + −1.3%
FY25
262.7% = 259.5% + 0.9%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

MetricFY 2025
Sources
  • 40-F · 2026-03-19
FY 2024
Sources
  • 40-F · 2025-03-21
FY 2023
Sources
  • 40-F · 2024-03-22
FY 2022
Sources
  • 40-F · 2023-03-29
FY 2021
Sources
  • 40-F · 2022-03-22
Market Cap$30.8Bcurrent$21.5Best.$20.7Best.$12.0Best.$7.7Best.
Revenue$2.5B↑16%$2.2B↑12%$2.0B↑42%$1.4B↑19%$1.2B
Operating Income$451.4M↑27%$355.5M↑66%$213.8M↑1825%$11.1M↑110%-$106.9M
Net Income$430.5M↑259%$119.8M↓56%$272.8M↑314%$66.0M↑182%-$80.5M
EPS (Diluted)$0.99↑263%$0.27↓57%$0.63↑286%$0.16↑180%$-0.20
Gross Margin27.9%↑12%25.0%↑15%21.7%↑74%12.5%↑9425%0.1%
Operating Margin17.8%↑9%16.3%↑49%10.9%↑1257%0.8%↑109%-9.2%
ROE8.5%↑216%2.7%↓54%5.9%↑287%1.5%↑172%-2.1%
Total Debt$727.5M↓19%$892.9M↓34%$1.3B↑83%$735.7M↑5848%$12.4M
Shareholders' Equity$5.0B↑14%$4.4B↓4%$4.6B↑7%$4.3B↑13%$3.8B
Current Ratio2.47↑52%1.62↑5%1.55↓74%5.92↑14%5.18
Debt / Equity0.14↓28%0.20↓31%0.29↑71%0.17↑5152%0.00
Operating Cash Flow$1.0B↑63%$630.9M↑21%$520.1M↑131%$224.8M↓37%$359.6M
Free Cash Flow$785.3M↑62%$483.4M↑20%$404.0M↑240%$118.9M↓58%$282.1M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Non-Metallic Mining

CCJ vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$2.5BBottom 25%
Net Income$430.5MBottom 25%
ROE8.5%Bottom 25%
D/E0.14Top 25%
Op. Margin17.8%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio2.47Median
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
BHP Group LtdBHP$202.0B$79.49$51.3B$9.0B18.9%0.4538.0%1.461/96/92/71/3F-Score 57/11
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP/SCCO$140.0B$164.08$13.4B$4.3B39.4%0.6152.2%3.894/95/94/71/3F-Score 75/11
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INCFCX$85.0B$59.24$25.9B$4.2B22.0%0.5025.2%2.292/95/93/70/3F-Score 57/11
Vale S.A.VALE$47.7B$11.22$38.4B$2.4B7.0%0.0215.4%1.151/94/92/71/3F-Score 34/11
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INCMLM$36.5B$513.61$6.2B$1.1B11.3%0.5323.4%3.574/93/91/70/3F-Score 87/11
Vulcan Materials COVMC$35.8B$278.63$7.9B$1.1B12.6%0.5120.4%2.692/92/92/70/3F-Score 95/11
TECK RESOURCES LTDTECK$29.6B$60.19$7.9B$1.0B5.6%0.1620.9%2.543/92/92/70/3F-Score 84/11
HECLA MINING CO/DE/HL$8.8B$13.10$1.4B$321.7M12.4%0.1036.2%2.723/92/95/70/3F-Score 85/11