Charlie's Holdings, Inc.
CHUCAbout the company
Charlie's Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, formulates, markets, and distributes non-combustible nicotine-related, and non-nicotine vapor products in the United States and internationally. The company offers alternative alkaloid products under the Metatine and SBX brands; nicotine-based disposable products under the Pacha and PACHAMAMA brands; e-liquid products; and nicotine salt products. It sells its products through distributors, specialty retailers, and third-party online resellers. Charlie's Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$0.19
+192.3% vs price
Models with upside
5 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
CHUC undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $0.06 (median $0.19)
Key risk
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #2566 (Top 82.9%) | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Margin of Safety | +13.3% | +65.8% | +82.8% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +75.0% | +50.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-01 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-17 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models100% pass✓ 5▾
CHUC undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $0.06 (median $0.19)
Graham fair value$0.07✓Graham+13.3% margin vs $0.06Buffett fair value$0.19✓Buffett+65.8% margin vs $0.06Lynch fair value$0.38✓Lynch+82.8% margin vs $0.06Pabrai fair value$0.26✓Pabrai+75.0% margin vs $0.06Akre fair value$0.13✓Akre+50.0% margin vs $0.06
Where It Falls Short
- Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (0/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✗GreenblattRank #2566✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
11 of 12 flag CHUC's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change54.70% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.65✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-3.1x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
7 of 8 flag CHUC's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +4 more
Current Ratio1.65✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-390.7%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-400.7%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-116.8%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY0.67 -> 1.41✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.97x -> 1.81x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.65✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-73.8%; FY2024: ROIC=-690.5%; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)1/4 years above 12% (latest -690.5%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Cash Flow20% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
8 of 10 flag CHUC's cash flow — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +5 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$4.5M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-5.8M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-5.8M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.97%, ROA=38.91%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=3.2x, FCF Yield=-31.8%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive1/14 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-32.5%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/16 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-5.8M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-31.81%; #3681/4519 (top 81.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Valuation23% pass✓ 7✗ 21▾
10 of 13 flag CHUC's valuation — Graham, Greenblatt, Dreman +7 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio5.2x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.17✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-12.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-12.8%, ROC=-116.8%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS3.2x✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share5.2x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=3.2x, OE Yield=25.3%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=3.2x, FCF Yield=-31.8%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=3.2x, P/B=5.2x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low141% of trailing low ($0.05)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-10.73%; #4210/6340 (top 66.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1719; #4344/6449 (top 67.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS3.2x✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share5.21x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+1.3529; #1448/5247 (top 27.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-31.81%; #3681/4519 (top 81.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-73.32%; #5723/6202 (top 92.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Profitability25% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾
12 of 16 flag CHUC's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more
Positive EPS (10 years)2/19 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)3/19 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)59.0%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-10.4% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$4.5M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.17✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR18.9%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-62.4%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-12.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-12.8%, ROC=-116.8%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets38.91%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-105.42% -> 38.91% (delta: +144.33%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.97%, ROA=38.91%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY37.1% -> 27.0%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-9.3%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-62.4%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=3.2x, P/B=5.2x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity63.8% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency3/16 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-10.8%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-62.4%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-13.6% (2023) -> -10.4% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -13.6% -> -10.4%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-10.73%; #4210/6340 (top 66.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+52.85%; #604/3702 (top 16.3%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-62.42%; #4334/5226 (top 82.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.5671; #5011/5884 (top 85.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR18.9% over 4 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years2/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Growth25% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾
6 of 8 flag CHUC's growth — Graham, Dreman, Marks +3 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.17✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR18.9%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 150.5% vs Rev: 199.1%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-0.20 (2010) -> $0.02 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency3/16 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-38.5%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -13.6% -> -10.4%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR4.6%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR18.9% over 4 years✓Neff7%-20% annualized
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 6.5% of shares last year, 19.6% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-06-30 2025-07-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18.2Mcurrent | -- | -- | $76.4Mest. | $12.7Mest. | $37.8Mest. | $23.8Mest. | $23.1Mest. |
| Revenue | $24.7M↑199% | $3.8M↑49% | $4.8M↑108% | $20.9M↑169% | $7.8M↓52% | $16.3M↓39% | $26.4M↑23% | $21.5M |
| Operating Income | -$2.7M↑23% | -$1.2M↓41% | -$975.0K↓18% | -$2.2M↑34% | -$3.3M↓50% | -$2.2M↓22% | -$1.8M↓419% | $565.0K |
| Net Income | -$2.0M↓223% | -$1.7M↓134% | -$1.1M↑14% | $4.5M↑208% | -$4.2M↓99% | -$2.1M↓31% | -$1.6M↓133% | $4.8M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | -- | -- | $0.02↑200% | $-0.02↓100% | $-0.01 | $-0.01↓200% | $0.01 |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 29.4% | 24.6% | 27.0%↓27% | 37.1% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.8%↑74% | -32.5%↑6% | -20.3%↑43% | -10.4%↑76% | -42.5%↓214% | -13.6%↓98% | -6.8%↓360% | 2.6% |
| ROE | -62.4%↓186% | — | — | 131.4%↓44% | 233.7%↓88% | 1956.1%↑2189% | -93.6%↓161% | 153.6% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | $2.2M↓12% | $2.5M↑114% | $1.1M↑667% | $150.0K |
| Shareholders' Equity | $3.1M↑43% | $3.1M↑43% | $3.1M↑211% | $3.4M↑292% | -$1.8M↓1564% | -$107.0K↓106% | $1.7M↓46% | $3.1M |
| Current Ratio | 1.65↑3% | 1.65↑3% | 1.52↑196% | 1.41↑111% | 0.67↓38% | 1.07↓13% | 1.22↓15% | 1.44 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | -1.21↑95% | -23.03↓3504% | 0.68↑1312% | 0.05 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$13.4M↓207% | -$383.0K↑86% | -$1.1M↓170% | -$5.8M↓256% | -$1.6M↓107% | -$783.0K↑54% | -$1.7M↓28% | -$1.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -$5.8M↓258% | -$1.6M↓107% | -$783.0K↑59% | -$1.9M↓31% | -$1.5M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
CHUC vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |