Charlie's Holdings, Inc.

CHUC
About the company

Charlie's Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, formulates, markets, and distributes non-combustible nicotine-related, and non-nicotine vapor products in the United States and internationally. The company offers alternative alkaloid products under the Metatine and SBX brands; nicotine-based disposable products under the Pacha and PACHAMAMA brands; e-liquid products; and nicotine salt products. It sells its products through distributors, specialty retailers, and third-party online resellers. Charlie's Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California.

Country: United StatesPrice: $0.06Market Cap: $18.2M

Investment snapshot

6%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 12

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$0.19

+192.3% vs price

Models with upside

5 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

CHUC undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $0.06 (median $0.19)

Key risk

Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2566 (Top 82.9%)PASSFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+13.3%+65.8%+82.8%N/AN/AN/AN/A+75.0%+50.0%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30 · TTM ended 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-04-01

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-08-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Valuation models100% pass✓ 5▾

    CHUC undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $0.06 (median $0.19)

    Graham fair value$0.07
    ✓Graham+13.3% margin vs $0.06
    Buffett fair value$0.19
    ✓Buffett+65.8% margin vs $0.06
    Lynch fair value$0.38
    ✓Lynch+82.8% margin vs $0.06
    Pabrai fair value$0.26
    ✓Pabrai+75.0% margin vs $0.06
    Akre fair value$0.13
    ✓Akre+50.0% margin vs $0.06

Where It Falls Short

  • Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾

    Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (0/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✗GreenblattRank #2566✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

    11 of 12 flag CHUC's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest Coverage
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change54.70% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.65
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-3.1x, D/EBITDA=N/A
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾

    7 of 8 flag CHUC's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +4 more

    Current Ratio1.65
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-390.7%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-400.7%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-116.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY0.67 -> 1.41
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.97x -> 1.81x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.65
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-73.8%; FY2024: ROIC=-690.5%; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)1/4 years above 12% (latest -690.5%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Cash Flow20% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾

    8 of 10 flag CHUC's cash flow — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +5 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$4.5M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-5.8M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-5.8M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.97%, ROA=38.91%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=3.2x, FCF Yield=-31.8%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive1/14 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-32.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/16 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-5.8M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-31.81%; #3681/4519 (top 81.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation23% pass✓ 7✗ 21▾

    10 of 13 flag CHUC's valuation — Graham, Greenblatt, Dreman +7 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio5.2x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.17
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-12.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-12.8%, ROC=-116.8%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS3.2x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share5.2x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=3.2x, OE Yield=25.3%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=3.2x, FCF Yield=-31.8%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=3.2x, P/B=5.2x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low141% of trailing low ($0.05)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-10.73%; #4210/6340 (top 66.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.1719; #4344/6449 (top 67.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS3.2x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share5.21x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+1.3529; #1448/5247 (top 27.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-31.81%; #3681/4519 (top 81.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-73.32%; #5723/6202 (top 92.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Profitability25% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾

    12 of 16 flag CHUC's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)2/19 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)3/19 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)59.0%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-10.4% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$4.5M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.17
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR18.9%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-62.4%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-12.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-12.8%, ROC=-116.8%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets38.91%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-105.42% -> 38.91% (delta: +144.33%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-49.97%, ROA=38.91%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY37.1% -> 27.0%
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-9.3%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-62.4%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=3.2x, P/B=5.2x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity63.8% (3-yr avg)
    ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/16 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-10.8%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-62.4%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-13.6% (2023) -> -10.4% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -13.6% -> -10.4%
    ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-10.73%; #4210/6340 (top 66.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+52.85%; #604/3702 (top 16.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-62.42%; #4334/5226 (top 82.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.5671; #5011/5884 (top 85.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR18.9% over 4 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years2/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Growth25% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾

    6 of 8 flag CHUC's growth — Graham, Dreman, Marks +3 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.17
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR18.9%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 150.5% vs Rev: 199.1%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$-0.20 (2010) -> $0.02 (2025)
    ✓DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/16 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-38.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -13.6% -> -10.4%
    ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR4.6%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR18.9% over 4 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Pharmaceutical Products
SIC Sector: Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals
Size: Micro Cap($18.2M)
Revenue: $20.9M+169.4% YoY
Net Income: $4.5M+208.2% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-10.4%
Return on Equity131.4%
Debt / Equity--
Current Ratio1.41
EPS (Diluted)$0.02
Shares Retired−6.5% / −19.6% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 6.5% of shares last year, 19.6% issued over two.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-06-30

2025-07-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-04-01
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-05-29
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-04-15
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-04-17
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-04-12
Market Cap$18.2Mcurrent----$76.4Mest.$12.7Mest.$37.8Mest.$23.8Mest.$23.1Mest.
Revenue$24.7M↑199%$3.8M↑49%$4.8M↑108%$20.9M↑169%$7.8M↓52%$16.3M↓39%$26.4M↑23%$21.5M
Operating Income-$2.7M↑23%-$1.2M↓41%-$975.0K↓18%-$2.2M↑34%-$3.3M↓50%-$2.2M↓22%-$1.8M↓419%$565.0K
Net Income-$2.0M↓223%-$1.7M↓134%-$1.1M↑14%$4.5M↑208%-$4.2M↓99%-$2.1M↓31%-$1.6M↓133%$4.8M
EPS (Diluted)------$0.02↑200%$-0.02↓100%$-0.01$-0.01↓200%$0.01
Gross Margin27.4%29.4%24.6%27.0%↓27%37.1%———
Operating Margin-10.8%↑74%-32.5%↑6%-20.3%↑43%-10.4%↑76%-42.5%↓214%-13.6%↓98%-6.8%↓360%2.6%
ROE-62.4%↓186%——131.4%↓44%233.7%↓88%1956.1%↑2189%-93.6%↓161%153.6%
Total Debt--------$2.2M↓12%$2.5M↑114%$1.1M↑667%$150.0K
Shareholders' Equity$3.1M↑43%$3.1M↑43%$3.1M↑211%$3.4M↑292%-$1.8M↓1564%-$107.0K↓106%$1.7M↓46%$3.1M
Current Ratio1.65↑3%1.65↑3%1.52↑196%1.41↑111%0.67↓38%1.07↓13%1.22↓15%1.44
Debt / Equity————-1.21↑95%-23.03↓3504%0.68↑1312%0.05
Operating Cash Flow-$13.4M↓207%-$383.0K↑86%-$1.1M↓170%-$5.8M↓256%-$1.6M↓107%-$783.0K↑54%-$1.7M↓28%-$1.3M
Free Cash Flow-------$5.8M↓258%-$1.6M↓107%-$783.0K↑59%-$1.9M↓31%-$1.5M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products

CHUC vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$20.9MBottom 25%
Net Income$4.5MMedian
ROE131.4%Top 25%
D/E—
Op. Margin-10.4%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio1.41Bottom 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
Merck & Co., Inc.MRK$364.3B$147.76$65.0B$18.3B34.7%0.94—1.542/95/94/70/3F-Score 41/11
ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT$188.0B$108.52$44.3B$6.5B12.5%0.2518.2%1.583/94/92/71/3F-Score 53/11
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY$129.7B$63.43$48.2B$7.1B38.2%2.4419.4%1.262/91/93/71/3F-Score 85/11
BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH$11.4B$72.80$1.2B$73.4M3.8%—8.4%3.464/93/93/70/3F-Score 54/11
REPLIGEN CORPRGEN$10.7B$167.79$738.3M$48.9M2.3%0.267.5%8.373/92/93/70/3F-Score 75/11
IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS$4.8B$29.06$943.7M$381.4M-78.0%3.60-40.4%3.833/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
NEOGEN CORPNEOG$2.5B$11.23$870.4M$7.9M-0.4%0.76-2.5%3.823/91/92/70/3F-Score 64/11
Pharvaris N.V.PHVS$2.4B$33.36—$206.4M-64.8%0.00——0/90/92/70/3F-Score 22/11