Douglas Emmett Inc

DEI
About the company

Douglas Emmett, Inc. is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust , and one of the largest owners and operators of high-quality office and multifamily properties located in the premier coastal submarkets of Los Angeles and Honolulu. Douglas Emmett focuses on owning and acquiring a substantial share of top-tier office properties and premier multifamily communities in neighborhoods that possess significant supply constraints, high-end executive housing and key lifestyle amenities.

Country: United StatesPrice: $9.90Market Cap: $2.0B

Investment snapshot

29%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

5

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 8

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$8.10

-18.2% vs price

Models with upside

1 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

4 of 6 pass — Neff and Oshaughnessy object

Key risk

All 12 investors flag DEI's debt & leverage

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictPASSFAILFAILNot rankedPASSPASSPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-106.3%N/AN/A-15.1%N/AN/AN/A+27.7%-9.4%-30.4%N/A-275.0%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-20

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Cash Flow67% pass✓ 5✗ 2▾

    4 of 6 pass — Neff and Oshaughnessy object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$147.6M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$386.9M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.17%, ROA=0.18%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)4.3x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency22/22 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Debt & Leverage0% pass✗ 15▾

    All 12 investors flag DEI's debt & leverage

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 2.91, IC: 0.8x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity3.14
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-5.4B
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change58.47% -> 59.74%
    ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities
    ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity3.14
    ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels3.14
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=0.8x, D/EBITDA=9.4x
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity3.14
    ✗Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-3.1376; #3942/4210 (top 93.6%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency0% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion

    Current Ratio
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)2.2%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-7.8%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.10x -> 0.11x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital2.0%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=1.5%; FY2024: ROIC=2.2%; FY2025: ROIC=2.0%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC0.0% (RR=0% x ROIC=2.0%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 2.0%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Profitability13% pass✓ 9✗ 26▾

    14 of 16 flag DEI's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)16/24 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-100.0%
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)16/24 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)1.3%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)19.0% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$147.6M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)4.26
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 110.0x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR-20.3%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-1.1%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value2.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.6%, ROC=None
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets0.18%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY0.25% -> 0.18% (delta: -0.07%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.17%, ROA=0.18%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY64.5% -> 63.4%
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-1.1%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/FFO=4.0x
    ✓PabraiP/FFO < 15
    Return on Equity0.0% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency16/20 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue19.0%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-1.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR-20.3% CAGR over 5 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend14.7% (2023) -> 19.0% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 64.6% -> 63.4%, operating margin 14.7% -> 19.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-1.05%; #3414/6340 (top 53.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+6.66%; #3016/3702 (top 81.5%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-1.14%; #2988/5226 (top 57.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0049; #473/5884 (top 8.0%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-20.3% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years9/10 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾

    7 of 8 flag DEI's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-100.0%
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 110.0x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR-20.3%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$117308.00 (2003) -> $0.09 (2025)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR-47.3% CAGR over 22 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency16/20 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth1.8%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR-20.3% CAGR over 5 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 64.6% -> 63.4%, operating margin 14.7% -> 19.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR2.4%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-20.3% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Valuation models17% pass✓ 1✗ 5▾

    Models split on DEI at $9.90 — fair values range $2.64–$13.70

    Graham fair value$4.80
    ✗Graham-106.3% margin vs $9.90
    Greenblatt fair value$8.60
    ✗Greenblatt-15.1% margin vs $9.90
    Pabrai fair value$13.70
    ✓Pabrai+27.7% margin vs $9.90
    Akre fair value$9.05
    ✗Akre-9.4% margin vs $9.90
    Marks fair value$7.59
    ✗Marks-30.4% margin vs $9.90
    Templeton fair value$2.64
    ✗Templeton-275.0% margin vs $9.90
  • Valuation38% pass✓ 11✗ 14▾

    8 of 13 flag DEI's valuation — Lynch, Greenblatt, Marks +5 more

    Price / Book Value per Share0.9x
    ✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Price / FFO per Share4.0x
    ✓Graham<= 15x✓Dreman< 12x✓Ackman<= 25
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 110.0x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value2.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.6%, ROC=None
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / (CFO / Shares)4.3x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=110.0x, OE Yield=25.0%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/FFO or FFO YieldP/FFO=4.0x, FFO Yield=20.9%
    ✓PabraiP/FFO < 15 or FFO Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=110.0x, P/B=0.9x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / EPS110.0x
    ✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price vs. Trailing Low105% of trailing low ($9.42)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-1.05%; #3414/6340 (top 53.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.9172; #1647/6449 (top 25.5%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS110.0x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E-0.11
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.87x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change-18.1%
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.5112; #2598/5247 (top 49.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+2.27%; #2377/6202 (top 38.3%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Verdicts38% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾

    Split decision: 8 FAIL · 5 PASS · 3 NEUTRAL

    Overall verdict
    ✓GrahamPASS (3/7)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✓DremanPASS (4/10)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1628/2370 (Top 68.7%))✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Trading
SIC Sector: Holding & Investment Offices
Size: Small Cap($2.0B)
Revenue: $1.0B+1.8% YoY
Net Income: $16.3M-30.8% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin19.0%
Return on Equity0.9%
Debt / Equity2.91
Current Ratio--
EPS (Diluted)$0.09−30.8% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$0
Buybacks (2y)$0
Shares Retired−0.0% / −0.2% 2y
Sector-adjusted criteria: REIT

Depreciation distorts REIT earnings and book value, so FFO-based criteria replace P/E and free-cash-flow tests, and P/B tests are omitted.

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 0.0% of shares last year, 0.2% issued over two.

Buybacks
$0
Dividends
$127.3M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
48.6% = 48.8% + −0.1%
FY25
−30.8% = −30.8% + 0.1%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, gross profit, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, dividends paid.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-20
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-14
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-16
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-17
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-02-18
Market Cap$2.0Bcurrent------$1.7Best.$2.9Best.$2.0Best.$2.5Best.$4.3Best.
Revenue$1.0B↑2%$260.9M↑4%$256.5M↑2%$251.0M$1.0B↑2%$986.5M↓3%$1.0B↑3%$993.7M↑8%$918.4M
Operating Income--------$190.4M↓8%$206.8M↑38%$149.7M↓38%$241.6M↑20%$201.2M
Net Income-$20.8M↓194%-$8.8M↑19%-$2.7M↑54%-$2.5M↓106%$16.3M↓31%$23.5M↑155%-$42.7M↓144%$97.1M↑49%$65.3M
EPS (Diluted)--$-0.05↑29%$-0.02↑50%$-0.02↓108%$0.09↓31%$0.13↑150%$-0.26↓147%$0.55↑49%$0.37
Gross Margin62.6%↓2%61.4%↓3%63.2%63.7%↓1%63.4%↓2%64.5%64.6%↓3%66.4%↓1%67.0%
Operating Margin————19.0%↓10%21.0%↑43%14.7%↓40%24.3%↑11%21.9%
ROE-1.1%↓200%———0.9%↓25%1.1%↑159%-1.9%↓151%3.8%↑40%2.7%
Total Debt$5.7B↑3%$5.7B↑3%$5.7B↑3%$5.6B↓1%$5.5B↑1%$5.5B↓1%$5.5B↑7%$5.2B↑4%$5.0B
Shareholders' Equity$1.8B↓6%$1.8B↓6%$1.8B↓8%$1.9B↓9%$1.9B↓7%$2.1B↓7%$2.2B↓13%$2.6B↑6%$2.4B
Current Ratio—————————
Debt / Equity3.14↑10%3.14↑10%3.11↑12%2.97↑8%2.91↑9%2.67↑7%2.50↑23%2.03↓2%2.07
Operating Cash Flow$367.0M↓8%$90.8M↓17%$96.1M↑18%$116.9M↓12%$386.9M↓5%$408.7M↓4%$427.0M↓14%$496.9M↑11%$447.0M
Free Cash Flow------------------

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Trading

DEI vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$1.0BMedian
Net Income$16.3MBottom 25%
ROE0.9%Bottom 25%
D/E2.91Bottom 25%
Op. Margin19.0%Median
Curr. Ratio—
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
REALTY INCOME CORPO$56.1B$58.82$5.7B$1.1B2.7%0.6316.8%—2/71/93/70/3F-Score 64/10
Ventas, Inc.VTR$47.0B$88.92$5.8B$261.5M2.1%1.043.5%—2/71/92/70/3F-Score 62/10
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INCRJF$32.4B$168.64$15.9B$2.1B17.1%0.28——3/93/93/71/3F-Score 64/11
ROYAL GOLD INCRGLD$21.7B$256.89$1.0B$466.3M6.5%0.1361.9%3.124/92/94/70/3F-Score 44/11
iShares Ethereum Trust ETFETHA$19.4B$44.02—$2.3B——————————
KIMCO REALTY CORPKIM$17.0B$25.55$2.1B$584.7M5.6%0.7436.0%—3/72/94/70/3F-Score 75/10
LandBridge Co LLCLB$5.6B$73.15$199.1M$30.1M8.9%1.6559.5%4.872/93/92/70/3F-Score 63/11
Digital Turbine, Inc.APPS$927.6M$7.61$565.3M$37.7M-19.6%1.886.0%1.161/92/92/71/3F-Score 70/11