EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES INC
ELSAbout the company
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. is a self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust. As of June 30, 2026, they own or have an interest in 453 properties in 35 states and British Columbia consisting of 173,419 sites. Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. is headquartered in Chicago. Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. was incorporated in 1992 in Maryland and based in Chicago, Illinois.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
4 / 10
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$23.83
-61.6% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
All 12 investors flag ELS's debt & leverage
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | PASS | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
| Margin of Safety | -206.9% | N/A | -210.1% | -318.9% | N/A | -119.5% | N/A | -160.7% | +8.4% | N/A | N/A | -140.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-18 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-10-27 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Debt & Leverage0% pass✗ 15▾
All 12 investors flag ELS's debt & leverage
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.56, IC: 3.0x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity1.56✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change56.76% -> 58.24%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.56✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels1.56✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=3.0x, D/EBITDA=5.6x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity1.56✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.5618; #3620/4210 (top 86.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾
All 8 investors flag ELS's efficiency
Current Ratio✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)5.4%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-4.6%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.27x -> 0.27x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital7.3%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=5.1%; FY2024: ROIC=6.1%; FY2025: ROIC=6.1%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC0.0% (RR=0% x ROIC=7.3%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 6.1%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Valuation models14% pass✓ 1✗ 6▾
Models split on ELS at $62.12 — fair values range $14.83–$67.78
Graham fair value$20.24✗Graham-206.9% margin vs $62.12Lynch fair value$20.03✗Lynch-210.1% margin vs $62.12Greenblatt fair value$14.83✗Greenblatt-318.9% margin vs $62.12Dreman fair value$28.30✗Dreman-119.5% margin vs $62.12Pabrai fair value$23.83✗Pabrai-160.7% margin vs $62.12Akre fair value$67.78✓Akre+8.4% margin vs $62.12Templeton fair value$25.86✗Templeton-140.2% margin vs $62.12 - Valuation15% pass✓ 4✗ 21▾
11 of 13 flag ELS's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +8 more
Price / FFO per Share19.7x✗Graham<= 15x✗Dreman< 12x✓Ackman<= 25Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)3.10✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value2.5%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.5%, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / (CFO / Shares)21.1x✗Dreman< 8xValuation ReasonablenessP/E=30.9x, OE Yield=5.1%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/FFO or FFO YieldP/FFO=19.7x, FFO Yield=4.9%✗PabraiP/FFO < 15 or FFO Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=30.9x, P/B=6.9x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-119.5% (IV=$28.30 vs Price=$62.12)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / EPS30.9x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price vs. Trailing Low106% of trailing low ($58.71)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Price / Book Value per Share6.9x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Net income / market capitalization+3.23%; #2295/6340 (top 36.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1399; #4527/6449 (top 70.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS30.9x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.43✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share7.08x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+33.8%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.1263; #4194/5247 (top 79.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-3.03%; #3010/6202 (top 48.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Verdicts17% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
Split decision: 10 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/7)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (2/10)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (7/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (5/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability38% pass✓ 20✗ 15▾
10 of 16 flag ELS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +7 more
Positive EPS (10 years)18/24 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)24/24 years positive✓BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)21.7%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)25.6% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$368.4M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)3.10✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR10.0%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE23.1%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value2.5%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.5%, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets7.00%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY6.82% -> 7.00% (delta: +0.18%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=9.94%, ROA=7.00%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity23.1%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/FFO=19.7x✗PabraiP/FFO < 15Return on Equity22.7% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value-119.5% (IV=$28.30 vs Price=$62.12)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency24/24 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue26.1%✓Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity23.1%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR10.0% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend21.5% (2023) -> 25.6% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 21.5% -> 25.6%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+3.23%; #2295/6340 (top 36.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+23.10%; #670/5226 (top 12.8%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0072; #628/5884 (top 10.7%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR10.0% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Growth38% pass✓ 7✗ 6▾
5 of 8 flag ELS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +2 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)3.10✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR10.0%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency24/24 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth2.5%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency5/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR10.0% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 21.5% -> 25.6%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR6.5%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR10.0% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualized - Cash Flow50% pass✓ 4✗ 3▾
3 of 6 pass — Dreman, Neff and Oshaughnessy object
Free Cash Flow Proxy$368.4M✓BuffettPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$571.1M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=9.94%, ROA=7.00%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)21.1x✗Dreman< 8xPositive Operating Cash Flow frequency22/22 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Depreciation distorts REIT earnings and book value, so FFO-based criteria replace P/E and free-cash-flow tests, and P/B tests are omitted.
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 1.5% of shares last year, 4.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $2.3M
- Dividends
- $388.0M
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, interest expense, operating cash flow, dividends paid. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.5Bcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $12.1Best. | $12.0Best. | $11.8Best. | $12.1Best. | $12.9Best. |
| Revenue | $1.6B↑3% | $409.9M↑4% | $397.8M↑6% | $397.6M↑3% | $1.5B | $1.5B↑2% | $1.5B↑3% | $1.4B↑10% | $1.3B |
| Operating Income | $411.4M↑4% | $100.7M↑2% | $99.4M↑18% | $112.4M↑3% | $391.3M↑3% | $380.7M↑19% | $320.1M↑8% | $295.5M↑9% | $272.2M |
| Net Income | $404.1M↑1% | $89.3M↓11% | $99.5M↑19% | $111.5M↓3% | $402.1M↑4% | $384.8M↑17% | $329.7M↑10% | $298.8M↑8% | $276.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.45↓10% | $0.50↑19% | $0.56↓2% | $2.01↑3% | $1.96↑16% | $1.69↑10% | $1.53↑7% | $1.43 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.1%↑1% | 24.6%↓2% | 25.0%↑12% | 28.3% | 25.6%↑2% | 24.9%↑16% | 21.5%↑5% | 20.4%↓1% | 20.7% |
| ROE | 23.1%↑2% | — | — | — | 22.9%↑4% | 22.1%↓4% | 23.1%↑12% | 20.7%↑6% | 19.5% |
| Total Debt | $2.7B↓2% | $2.7B↓2% | $2.7B↓2% | $2.8B↓5% | $3.3B↑4% | $3.2B↓9% | $3.5B↑4% | $3.4B↑3% | $3.3B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.8B↑2% | $1.8B↑1% | $1.8B↑1% | $1.7B↑22% | $1.4B↓1% | $1.4B↑2% | $1.4B |
| Current Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / Equity | 1.56↓2% | 1.56↓2% | 1.56↓4% | 1.57↓6% | 1.91↑3% | 1.84↓25% | 2.46↑5% | 2.34↑1% | 2.31 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $593.4M↑3% | $151.8M↑3% | $147.9M↑13% | $194.2M | $571.1M↓4% | $596.7M↑9% | $548.0M↑15% | $475.8M↓7% | $509.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | $343.0M↑209% | $111.0M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Trading
ELS vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REALTY INCOME CORPO | $56.1B | $58.82 | $5.7B | $1.1B | 2.7% | 0.63 | 16.8% | — | 2/7 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/10 |
| Ventas, Inc.VTR | $47.0B | $88.92 | $5.8B | $261.5M | 2.1% | 1.04 | 3.5% | — | 2/7 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/10 |
| RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INCRJF | $32.4B | $168.64 | $15.9B | $2.1B | 17.1% | 0.28 | — | — | 3/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| ROYAL GOLD INCRGLD | $21.7B | $256.89 | $1.0B | $466.3M | 6.5% | 0.13 | 61.9% | 3.12 | 4/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETFETHA | $19.4B | $44.02 | — | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KIMCO REALTY CORPKIM | $17.0B | $25.55 | $2.1B | $584.7M | 5.6% | 0.74 | 36.0% | — | 3/7 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/10 |
| LandBridge Co LLCLB | $5.6B | $73.15 | $199.1M | $30.1M | 8.9% | 1.65 | 59.5% | 4.87 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| Digital Turbine, Inc.APPS | $927.6M | $7.61 | $565.3M | $37.7M | -19.6% | 1.88 | 6.0% | 1.16 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 0/11 |