ELUTIA INC.
ELUTAbout the company
Elutia Inc., a commercial-stage company, focuses on developing drug-eluting biomatrix products for use in surgical reconstruction and related applications. The company operates in two segments, Women's Health and Cardiovascular. Its lead development programs include NXT-41 and NXT-41x, which are designed as biologic scaffolds combined with local antibiotic delivery.
Investment snapshot
Positive
5
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 9
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$6.67
+713.4% vs price
Models with upside
3 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
ELUT undervalued: all 3 models price fair value above $0.82 (median $6.67)
Key risk
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | PASS | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | PASS | FAIL | BUY | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| Margin of Safety | +76.1% | +94.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +87.7% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-10 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models100% pass✓ 3▾
ELUT undervalued: all 3 models price fair value above $0.82 (median $6.67)
Graham fair value$3.43✓Graham+76.1% margin vs $0.82Buffett fair value$13.96✓Buffett+94.1% margin vs $0.82Pabrai fair value$6.67✓Pabrai+87.7% margin vs $0.82
Where It Falls Short
- Growth0% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 0.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -86.5% vs Rev: -52.8%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-18.48 (2019) -> $0.87 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-15.0%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 44.7% -> 53.7%, operating margin -123.4% -> -218.9%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR-22.0%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Profitability13% pass✓ 11✗ 24▾
14 of 16 flag ELUT's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/8 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/8 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-31.8%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-218.9% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$54.3M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 0.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE354.9%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-180.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-180.1%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets85.61%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-149.33% -> 85.61% (delta: +234.94%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-71.87%, ROA=85.61%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY46.4% -> 53.7%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-286.2%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity354.9%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=0.9x, P/B=1.4x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-31.8% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-279.0%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity354.9%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-123.4% (2023) -> -218.9% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 44.7% -> 53.7%, operating margin -123.4% -> -218.9%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+149.40%; #79/6340 (top 1.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+12.17%; #2636/3702 (top 71.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+354.92%; #22/5226 (top 0.4%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.7712; #5167/5884 (top 87.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/7 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Valuation15% pass✓ 10✗ 18▾
11 of 13 flag ELUT's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +8 more
Price / Book Value per Share1.4x✗Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio1.4x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 0.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-180.1%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-180.1%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS0.9x✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xValuation ReasonablenessP/E=0.9x, OE Yield=144.1%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.9x, FCF Yield=-128.2%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=0.9x, P/B=1.4x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low134% of trailing low ($0.61)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+149.40%; #79/6340 (top 1.2%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.4209; #3184/6449 (top 49.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS0.9x✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share1.44x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-91.8%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.2733; #3451/5247 (top 65.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-139.21%; #4132/4519 (top 91.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-27.43%; #4301/6202 (top 69.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow20% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
8 of 10 flag ELUT's cash flow — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +5 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$54.3M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-50.7M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-44.8M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-71.87%, ROA=85.61%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.9x, FCF Yield=-128.2%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive0/7 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-134.5%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/7 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-50.7M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-139.21%; #4132/4519 (top 91.4%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag ELUT's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio2.63✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-855.6%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-865.6%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY0.69 -> 2.22✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.40x -> 0.20x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.63✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital-93.6%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/2 years above 12% (latest -144.6%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Verdicts36% pass✓ 5✗ 9▾
Split decision: 9 FAIL · 4 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)✓AsnessBUY (Rank #593/2370 (Top 25.0%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Debt & Leverage50% pass✓ 9✗ 6▾
6 of 12 pass — Buffett, Lynch, Munger +3 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $8.1M vs NCA $26.1M✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.53✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$21.0M✓LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change62.57% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities2.63✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.53✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.53✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-3.6x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.53✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.5284; #2524/4210 (top 60.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 58.0% of shares last year, 153.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $36.4Mcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $48.2Mest. | $93.6Mest. | $65.6Mest. | $62.0Mest. | $65.8Mest. |
| Revenue | $9.9M↓53% | $1.1M↓66% | $2.4M↓61% | $3.1M↓48% | $12.3M↓15% | $14.5M↓42% | $24.7M↑4% | $23.8M↓50% | $47.4M |
| Operating Income | -$27.8M↑12% | -$6.9M↓32% | -$8.0M↑19% | -$6.3M↑20% | -$26.9M↑12% | -$30.7M↓1% | -$30.5M↑13% | -$35.2M↓53% | -$23.0M |
| Net Income | $54.4M↑305% | -$1.3M↑67% | -$7.6M↑20% | -$7.5M↓90% | $53.4M↑199% | -$53.9M↓43% | -$37.7M↓14% | -$32.9M↓32% | -$24.8M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.04↑79% | $-0.17↑35% | $-0.17↑19% | $0.87↑147% | $-1.86↑10% | $-2.07↑13% | $-2.38 | $-2.38 |
| Gross Margin | 59.0%↑28% | 61.7%↑11% | 59.6%↑22% | 57.9%↑42% | 53.7%↑16% | 46.4%↑4% | 44.7%↓8% | 48.8%↑22% | 40.1% |
| Operating Margin | -279.0%↓87% | -606.5%↓287% | -327.9%↓108% | -203.9%↓55% | -218.9%↓3% | -212.3%↓72% | -123.4%↑16% | -147.5%↓204% | -48.6% |
| ROE | 354.9%↑489% | — | — | — | 192.9%↑65% | 116.6%↑20% | 97.6%↓85% | 653.6%↑456% | -183.7% |
| Total Debt | $8.1M↓69% | $8.1M↓69% | -- | -- | -- | $23.9M↑1% | $23.7M↓2% | $24.3M↑31% | $18.5M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $15.3M↑135% | $15.3M↑135% | $15.7M↑138% | $22.5M↑162% | $27.7M↑160% | -$46.3M↓20% | -$38.6M↓667% | -$5.0M↓137% | $13.5M |
| Current Ratio | 2.63↑492% | 2.63↑492% | 1.77↑201% | 2.05↑151% | 2.22↑221% | 0.69↓5% | 0.73↓39% | 1.19↓35% | 1.82 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.53↑189% | 0.53↑189% | — | — | — | -0.52↑16% | -0.61↑87% | -4.82↓453% | 1.37 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$49.2M↓53% | -$8.1M↓182% | -$8.5M↓3% | -$7.8M↑12% | -$44.8M↓98% | -$22.7M↓4% | -$21.8M↓2% | -$21.4M↓39% | -$15.4M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$50.7M↓52% | -$8.2M↓132% | -$8.6M↓3% | -$8.3M↑9% | -$46.7M↓100% | -$23.3M↓5% | -$22.1M↓1% | -$22.0M↓39% | -$15.8M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
ELUT vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |