IMPERIAL OIL LTD

IMO
About the company

Imperial Oil Limited engages in exploration, production, and sale of crude oil and natural gas in Canada. The company operates in three segments: Upstream, Downstream and Chemical segments. The Upstream segment explores and produces crude oil, natural gas, synthetic crude oil, and bitumen. The Downstream segment transports and refines crude oil; blends refined products; and distributes and markets refined products.

Country: CanadaPrice: $128.70Market Cap: $60.7B

Investment snapshot

35%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

6

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 6

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$72.78

-43.4% vs price

Models with upside

1 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

6 of 10 pass — Buffett, Dreman, Pabrai +1 more object

Key risk

12 of 13 flag IMO's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILPASSFAILFAIL · Rank #1327 (Top 42.8%)PASSPASSPASSFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALPASSBUYNEUTRALNEUTRALNEUTRALFAIL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-112.9%-31.3%-76.8%-93.0%N/A-47.8%-60.1%-242.4%+8.6%-156.9%-106.9%-49.6%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-02-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Cash Flow60% pass✓ 8✗ 4▾

    6 of 10 pass — Buffett, Dreman, Pabrai +1 more object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$2.8B
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$3.5B
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$4.9B
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=15.85%, ROA=7.72%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)12.6x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=26.9x, FCF Yield=5.7%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive11/18 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap5.6%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share17.9x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency18/18 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$3.5B
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.71%; #1434/4519 (top 31.7%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation8% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾

    12 of 13 flag IMO's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS22.2x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio3.8x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B84.00
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.77
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value5.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.0%, ROC=13.5%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS26.9x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)12.6x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share3.8x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=26.9x, OE Yield=4.6%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=26.9x, FCF Yield=5.7%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=26.9x, P/B=3.8x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-47.8% (IV=$87.08 vs Price=$128.70)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share17.9x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low193% of trailing low ($66.64)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+3.97%; #2023/6340 (top 31.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.2703; #3838/6449 (top 59.5%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS26.9x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.63
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share3.82x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+47.0%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.5719; #2443/5247 (top 46.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.71%; #1434/4519 (top 31.7%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-0.37%; #2815/6202 (top 45.4%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models9% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾

    Models split on IMO at $128.70 — fair values range $37.59–$140.77

    Graham fair value$60.44
    ✗Graham-112.9% margin vs $128.70
    Buffett fair value$97.99
    ✗Buffett-31.3% margin vs $128.70
    Lynch fair value$72.78
    ✗Lynch-76.8% margin vs $128.70
    Greenblatt fair value$66.68
    ✗Greenblatt-93.0% margin vs $128.70
    Dreman fair value$87.08
    ✗Dreman-47.8% margin vs $128.70
    Munger fair value$80.39
    ✗Munger-60.1% margin vs $128.70
    Pabrai fair value$37.59
    ✗Pabrai-242.4% margin vs $128.70
    Akre fair value$140.77
    ✓Akre+8.6% margin vs $128.70
    Marks fair value$50.09
    ✗Marks-156.9% margin vs $128.70
    Ackman fair value$62.20
    ✗Ackman-106.9% margin vs $128.70
    Templeton fair value$86.02
    ✗Templeton-49.6% margin vs $128.70
  • Profitability19% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾

    13 of 16 flag IMO's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)17/18 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)119.4%
    ✓Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)17/18 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)20.2%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)9.1% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$2.8B
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.74
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.77
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR15.2%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE14.7%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value5.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.0%, ROC=13.5%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets7.72%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY11.16% -> 7.72% (delta: -3.43%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=15.85%, ROA=7.72%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue9.1%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity14.7%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=26.9x, P/B=3.8x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity19.0% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-47.8% (IV=$87.08 vs Price=$128.70)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency17/18 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue9.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity14.7%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR15.2% CAGR over 4 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend12.5% (2023) -> 9.1% (2025)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin 12.5% -> 9.1%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+3.97%; #2023/6340 (top 31.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+14.69%; #1192/5226 (top 22.8%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0374; #2191/5884 (top 37.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR15.2% over 4 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years9/10 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    6 of 8 flag IMO's efficiency — Graham, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

    Current Ratio1.27
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)19.5%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+9.5%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)13.5%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.33 -> 1.27
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.20x -> 1.11x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.27
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital13.1%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=19.5%; FY2024: ROIC=18.3%; FY2025: ROIC=13.1%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC7.5% (RR=57% x ROIC=13.1%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)4/5 years above 12% (latest 13.1%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Verdicts46% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾

    Split decision: 6 FAIL · 5 PASS · 4 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✓BuffettPASS (5/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #1327✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✓SleepBUY (5/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)•NeffNEUTRAL (4/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #272/963 (Top 28.2%))
  • Debt & Leverage50% pass✓ 9✗ 6▾

    6 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Piotroski +3 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $2.5B vs NCA $1.3B
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.16, IC: 355.2x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.16
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-1.7B
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change8.03% -> 8.15%
    ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.27
    ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.16
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.16
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=355.2x, D/EBITDA=0.5x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.16
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1557; #1524/4210 (top 36.2%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth50% pass✓ 9✗ 4▾

    4 of 8 pass — Lynch, Dreman, Ackman +1 more object

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)119.4%
    ✓Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.77
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR15.2%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$3.59 (2008) -> $4.78 (2025)
    ✓DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR1.7% CAGR over 17 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency17/18 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-4.3%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR15.2% CAGR over 4 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin 12.5% -> 9.1%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR14.4%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR15.2% over 4 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Petroleum and Natural Gas
SIC Sector: Petroleum Refining
Size: Large Cap($60.7B)
Revenue: $34.7B-4.3% YoY
Net Income: $2.4B-28.6% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin9.1%
Return on Equity14.7%
Debt / Equity0.16
Current Ratio1.27
EPS (Diluted)$4.78−24.8% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$2.4B
Buybacks (2y)$4.3B
Shares Retired5.0% / 9.8% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 5.0% of shares last year, 9.8% over two.

Buybacks
$2.4B
Dividends
$1.0B

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
214.9% = 183.6% + 11.0%
FY23
−26.6% = −34.1% + 11.4%
FY24
1.5% = −6.5% + 8.6%
FY25
−24.8% = −28.6% + 5.2%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

Values marked CAD retain their reported currency.

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources
Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources
Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-18
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-19
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-28
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-22
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-02-23
Market Cap$60.7Bcurrent------$48.7Best.$32.9Best.$29.2Best.$29.4Best.$24.9Best.
RevenueCAD 56.0B↑16%CAD 16.2B↑34%CAD 16.1B↑43%CAD 12.4B↓1%$34.7B↓4%$36.3B↓4%$37.6B↓16%$44.6B↑52%$29.3B
Operating Income--------$3.1B↓28%$4.4B↓7%$4.7B↓34%$7.1B↑177%$2.6B
Net IncomeCAD 6.1B↑52%CAD 2.5B↑355%CAD 2.2B↑131%CAD 940.0M↓27%$2.4B↓29%$3.4B↓7%$3.6B↓34%$5.5B↑184%$1.9B
EPS (Diluted)--CAD 5.11↑378%CAD 4.52↑143%CAD 1.94↓23%$4.78↓25%$6.36↑1%$6.27↓27%$8.54↑215%$2.71
Gross Margin—————————
Operating Margin————9.1%↓25%12.1%↓3%12.5%↓21%15.9%↑82%8.7%
ROE24.8%↑47%———14.7%↓28%20.4%↓7%22.0%↓33%32.7%↑187%11.4%
Total DebtCAD 3.5BCAD 3.5BCAD 3.5BCAD 3.5B$2.6B↑5%$2.4B↓7%$2.6B↓1%$2.7B↓25%$3.6B
Shareholders' EquityCAD 24.5B↑3%CAD 24.5B↑3%CAD 24.5B↓2%CAD 22.7B↓7%$16.4B↓1%$16.5B↑1%$16.4B↓2%$16.7B↓1%$16.9B
Current Ratio1.30↓11%1.30↓11%1.38↓13%1.23↓17%1.27↓5%1.33↑6%1.26↑4%1.21↓14%1.41
Debt / Equity0.14↓3%0.14↓3%0.14↑2%0.15↑7%0.16↑5%0.15↓8%0.16↑1%0.16↓24%0.21
Operating Cash FlowCAD 8.6B↑31%CAD 3.2B↑80%CAD 2.7B↑85%CAD 756.0M↓50%$4.9B↑17%$4.2B↑53%$2.8B↓65%$7.8B↑83%$4.3B
Free Cash FlowCAD 6.3B↑32%CAD 2.6B↑98%CAD 2.2B↑119%CAD 281.0M↓75%$3.5B↑20%$2.9B↑101%$1.4B↓78%$6.7B↑96%$3.4B

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Petroleum and Natural Gas

IMO vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$34.7BMedian
Net Income$2.4BMedian
ROE14.7%Top 25%
D/E0.16Top 25%
Op. Margin9.1%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio1.27Median
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
TotalEnergies SETTE$199.0B$90.74$201.2B$13.1B11.4%0.49—0.974/94/91/70/3F-Score 46/11
CONOCOPHILLIPSCOP$168.2B$142.28$58.9B$8.0B12.4%0.36—1.302/93/93/70/3F-Score 76/11
BP PLCBP$117.7B$45.70$192.5B$55.0M0.1%1.096.6%1.261/93/91/70/3F-Score 52/11
SUNCOR ENERGY INCSU$80.5B$69.92$38.2B$4.3B13.1%0.22—1.392/92/92/70/3F-Score 46/11
CENOVUS ENERGY INC.CVE$52.6B$29.08$36.3B$2.9B12.4%0.35—1.571/91/93/70/3F-Score 55/11
WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDWDS$40.1B$21.08$13.0B$2.7B7.6%0.3330.0%1.593/94/90/70/3F-Score 47/11
EXPAND ENERGY CorpEXE$20.4B$88.53$12.1B$1.8B9.8%0.2720.4%1.012/95/93/71/3F-Score 77/11
YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMAYPF$14.9B$37.90$18.4B$826.0M-7.6%0.989.4%0.872/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11