KB HOME

KBH
About the company

KB Home operates as a homebuilding company in the United States. It builds and sells homes, including attached and detached single-family residential homes, townhomes, and condominiums primarily for first-time, first move-up, second move-up, and active adult homebuyers. The company also provides financial services, such as mortgage banking services, such as residential consumer mortgage loan originations to homebuyers; property and casualty insurance services, as well as earthquake, flood, and personal property insurance products to homebuyers; and title services.

Country: United StatesPrice: $47.90Market Cap: $2.9B

Investment snapshot

47%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

8

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 4

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$75.34

+57.3% vs price

Models with upside

9 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

Models split on KBH at $47.90 — fair values range $37.60–$138.62

Key risk

All 8 investors flag KBH's efficiency

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictPASSFAILFAILNot rankedPASSFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILBUYPASSBUYNEUTRALNEUTRALPASSBUYNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+48.2%+38.7%+46.1%N/AN/A+55.7%+11.8%+34.0%+65.4%+32.6%-27.4%+29.2%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-01-23

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 vs 2025-08-31 · TTM ended 2026-08-31

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-01-23

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-01-23

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-01-23

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-01-23

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-01-23

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-08-31

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-08-31

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-08-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-08

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Valuation models90% pass✓ 9✗ 1▾

    Models split on KBH at $47.90 — fair values range $37.60–$138.62

    Graham fair value$92.44
    ✓Graham+48.2% margin vs $47.90
    Buffett fair value$78.14
    ✓Buffett+38.7% margin vs $47.90
    Lynch fair value$88.95
    ✓Lynch+46.1% margin vs $47.90
    Dreman fair value$108.15
    ✓Dreman+55.7% margin vs $47.90
    Munger fair value$54.32
    ✓Munger+11.8% margin vs $47.90
    Pabrai fair value$72.55
    ✓Pabrai+34.0% margin vs $47.90
    Akre fair value$138.62
    ✓Akre+65.4% margin vs $47.90
    Marks fair value$71.08
    ✓Marks+32.6% margin vs $47.90
    Ackman fair value$37.60
    ✗Ackman-27.4% margin vs $47.90
    Templeton fair value$67.67
    ✓Templeton+29.2% margin vs $47.90
  • Valuation77% pass✓ 21✗ 7▾

    10 of 13 pass — Greenblatt, Dreman and Oshaughnessy object

    Net income / market capitalization+7.82%; #1031/6340 (top 16.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS6.6x
    ✓Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.8x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B5.20
    ✓Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.54
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=None, ROC=None
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS7.8x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)9.0x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.8x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=7.8x, OE Yield=13.8%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=7.8x, FCF Yield=9.9%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=7.8x, P/B=0.8x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value55.7% (IV=$108.15 vs Price=$47.90)
    ✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share10.5x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low104% of trailing low ($46.17)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.3061; #1080/6449 (top 16.7%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS7.8x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E2.15
    ✓Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.78x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+128.8%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+1.7801; #1181/5247 (top 22.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.98%; #2406/4519 (top 53.2%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-7.17%; #3262/6202 (top 52.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Verdicts67% pass✓ 8✗ 4▾

    Split decision: 5 PASS · 4 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 3 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✓GrahamPASS (5/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✓MarksBUY (4/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)✓TempletonBUY (7/8)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✓NeffPASS (6/6)✓SchlossBUY (6/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Where It Falls Short

  • Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾

    All 8 investors flag KBH's efficiency

    Current Ratio
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)4.5%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-5.5%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.00x -> 0.93x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Profitability25% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾

    12 of 16 flag KBH's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more

    Net income / market capitalization+7.82%; #1031/6340 (top 16.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive EPS (10 years)22/28 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)23/28 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)16.7%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)7.6% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$417.7M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.54
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.5%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE6.0%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=None, ROC=None
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets6.42%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY9.44% -> 6.42% (delta: -3.02%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.02%, ROA=6.42%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue5.6%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity6.0%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=7.8x, P/B=0.8x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity14.2% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value55.7% (IV=$108.15 vs Price=$47.90)
    ✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency23/28 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity6.0%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR14.5% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+5.99%; #2335/5226 (top 44.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0187; #1361/5884 (top 23.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR14.5% over 5 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Debt & Leverage25% pass✓ 5✗ 10▾

    9 of 12 flag KBH's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +6 more

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.43, IC: N/A
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.55
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities
    ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.55
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.55
    ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.55
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.5548; #2574/4210 (top 61.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

    5 of 10 pass — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +2 more object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$417.7M
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$28.7M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$335.7M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=5.02%, ROA=6.42%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)9.0x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=7.8x, FCF Yield=9.9%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive8/9 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap0.9%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share10.5x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency20/25 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$28.7M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.98%; #2406/4519 (top 53.2%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth50% pass✓ 8✗ 5▾

    4 of 8 pass — Graham, Dreman, Ackman +1 more object

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.54
    ✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.5%
    ✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency23/28 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-7.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR14.5% CAGR over 5 years
    ✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR8.3%
    ✓SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR14.5% over 5 years
    ✓Neff7%-20% annualized

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Construction
SIC Sector: Building Construction
Size: Mid Cap($2.9B)
Revenue: $6.2B-10.0% YoY
Net Income: $428.8M-34.5% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin--
Return on Equity11.0%
Debt / Equity0.43
Current Ratio--
EPS (Diluted)$6.15−27.2% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$541.3M
Buybacks (2y)$895.0M
Shares Retired12.4% / 23.5% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 12.4% of shares last year, 23.5% over two.

Buybacks
$541.3M
Dividends
$68.6M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
51.2% = 44.6% + 4.6%
FY23
−22.7% = −27.7% + 7.0%
FY24
20.2% = 11.0% + 8.3%
FY25
−27.2% = −34.5% + 11.2%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-08-31

2025-09-01 – 2026-08-31

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-06-01 – 2026-08-31

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-03-01 – 2026-05-31

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, dividends paid, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2025-12-01 – 2026-02-28

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-01-23
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-01-24
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-01-19
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-01-20
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-01-21
Market Cap$2.9Bcurrent------$3.6Best.$4.7Best.$4.8Best.$3.3Best.$3.7Best.
Revenue$5.2B↓21%$1.3B↓20%$1.1B↓27%$1.1B↓23%$6.2B↓10%$6.9B↑8%$6.4B↓7%$6.9B↑21%$5.7B
Operating Income------------------
Net Income$227.6M↓56%$65.3M↓41%$27.3M↓75%$33.4M↓69%$428.8M↓35%$655.0M↑11%$590.2M↓28%$816.7M↑45%$564.7M
EPS (Diluted)--$1.05↓35%$0.43↓71%$0.52↓65%$6.15↓27%$8.45↑20%$7.03↓23%$9.09↑51%$6.01
Gross Margin—————————
Operating Margin—————————
ROE6.0%↓55%———11.0%↓32%16.1%↑4%15.5%↓31%22.3%↑19%18.7%
Total Debt$2.1B↑9%$2.1B↑9%$2.0B↑4%$1.9B↑6%$1.7B$1.7B$1.7B↓8%$1.8B↑9%$1.7B
Shareholders' Equity$3.8B↓3%$3.8B↓3%$3.8B↓5%$3.9B↓6%$3.9B↓4%$4.1B↑7%$3.8B↑4%$3.7B↑21%$3.0B
Current Ratio—————————
Debt / Equity0.55↑11%0.55↑11%0.52↑9%0.49↑12%0.43↑4%0.42↓6%0.44↓12%0.50↓10%0.56
Operating Cash Flow$75.0M↓81%-$135.4M↓168%$31.9M↓81%-$125.4M↑63%$335.7M↓7%$362.7M↓66%$1.1B↑490%$183.4M↑592%-$37.3M
Free Cash Flow$28.7M↓92%-$145.0M↓178%$22.2M↓86%-$138.6M↑60%$287.3M↓11%$323.4M↓69%$1.0B↑658%$138.2M↑280%-$76.7M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Construction

KBH vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$6.2BBottom 25%
Net Income$428.8MMedian
ROE11.0%Bottom 25%
D/E0.43Median
Op. Margin—
Curr. Ratio—
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
HITACHI LTDHTHIY$137.0B$30.83——————1/90/92/70/3F-Score 73/11
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.PWR$90.7B$602.01$28.5B$1.0B11.5%0.675.7%1.141/91/93/71/3F-Score 53/11
HORTON D R INC /DE/DHI$39.5B$145.55$34.3B$3.6B14.8%0.25——4/92/94/70/3F-Score 44/11
EMCOR Group, Inc.EME$28.9B$659.36$17.0B$1.3B34.6%0.0010.1%1.223/96/96/71/3F-Score 76/11
PULTEGROUP INC/MI/PHM$23.4B$127.01$17.3B$2.2B17.1%———3/92/95/71/3F-Score 35/11
JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC.J$18.7B$158.23$12.0B$289.3M7.9%0.617.2%1.303/91/92/71/3F-Score 71/11
MASTEC INCMTZ$14.7B$182.78$14.3B$399.0M12.2%0.72—1.321/91/92/71/3F-Score 83/11
Toll Brothers, Inc.TOL$13.6B$147.85$11.0B$1.3B16.3%0.1115.7%—3/94/95/71/3F-Score 47/11