AEye, Inc.

LIDR
About the company

AEye, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides physical AI sensing solutions for vehicle autonomy, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), robotic vision applications, and non-automotive applications in the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. The company offers Apollo, an intelligent sensing lidar platform for ADAS and autonomous vehicles applications, as well as non-automotive market, including rail, construction, mining and agriculture, aerospace and defense, security and foreign object detection, and intelligent transportation systems.

Country: United StatesPrice: $0.74Market Cap: $34.8M

Investment snapshot

12%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

2

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

2 / 12

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

—

No comparable estimates

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILNot rankedPASSFAILPASSFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾

    8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: N/A
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities7.51
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0024; #430/4210 (top 10.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation0% pass✓ 7✗ 21▾

    No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.4x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=-82.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.4x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-100.5%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-80.1%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.4x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low131% of trailing low ($0.57)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-106.10%; #5413/6340 (top 85.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.7245; #782/6449 (top 12.1%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.41x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.0260; #4717/5247 (top 89.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-91.33%; #4045/4519 (top 89.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-62.80%; #5465/6202 (top 88.1%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾

    No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-33.9M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-31.8M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-27.8M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-30.56%, ROA=-37.36%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-80.1%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive0/6 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-94.3%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/6 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-31.8M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-91.33%; #4045/4519 (top 89.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 175.8% vs Rev: 397.8%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$-0.26 (2020) -> $-14.95 (2023)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency0/7 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-59.9%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency0/3 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin -946.4% -> -137.8%, operating margin -5995.6% -> -13618.5%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR-31.8%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾

    15 of 16 flag LIDR's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)0/8 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/8 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-144.0%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-13618.5% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-33.9M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-61.5%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=-82.9%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-37.36%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-130.75% -> -37.36% (delta: +93.39%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-30.56%, ROA=-37.36%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY-285.1% -> -137.8%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-14569.5%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-61.5%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/B=0.4x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-192.1% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency0/7 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-4357.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-61.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-5995.6% (2023) -> -13618.5% (2025)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin -946.4% -> -137.8%, operating margin -5995.6% -> -13618.5%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-106.10%; #5413/6340 (top 85.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets-0.84%; #3552/3702 (top 95.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-61.52%; #4325/5226 (top 82.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.5029; #4935/5884 (top 83.9%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾

    Split decision: 12 FAIL · 2 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (0/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #2066/2370 (Top 87.2%))✗NeffFAIL (0/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    6 of 8 flag LIDR's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more

    Current Ratio7.51
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-268.3%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-278.3%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-82.9%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY2.23 -> 10.46
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.01x -> 0.00x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities7.51
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital-51.8%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-238.9%; FY2024: ROIC=-185.4%; FY2025: ROIC=-30.8%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -30.8%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Automobiles and Trucks
SIC Sector: Transportation Equipment
Size: Micro Cap($34.8M)
Revenue: $233000.00+15.3% YoY
Net Income: $34.0M+4.2% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-13618.5%
Return on Equity-41.7%
Debt / Equity0.00
Current Ratio10.46

Similar Companies

TSLATesla, Inc.
$1.54T
PCARPACCAR INC
$56.2B
FFORD MOTOR CO
$47.6B
HMCHONDA MOTOR CO LTD
$44.5B

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, gross profit, ebit, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-18
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-24
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-03-27
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-03-16
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-28
Market Cap$34.8Mcurrent------$74.4Mest.--$8.1Mest.$3.1Best.$13.6Best.
Revenue$906.0K↑398%$506.0K↑912%$202.0K↑818%$101.0K↑58%$233.0K↑15%$202.0K↓86%$1.5M↓60%$3.6M↑21%$3.0M
Operating Income-$39.5M↓22%-$11.3M↓44%-$10.8M↓24%-$9.0M↓33%-$31.7M↑11%-$35.8M↑59%-$87.8M↑11%-$98.8M↓56%-$63.2M
Net Income-$37.0M↓5%-$11.2M↓21%-$10.0M↓8%-$8.3M↓4%-$34.0M↑4%-$35.5M↑59%-$87.1M↑12%-$98.7M↓52%-$65.0M
EPS (Diluted)------------$-14.95↓2273%$-0.63↓5%$-0.60
Gross Margin-65.0%↑32%-35.2%↑67%-79.7%↑80%-99.0%↓98%-137.8%↑52%-285.1%↑70%-946.4%↓579%-139.4%↓566%-21.0%
Operating Margin-4357.5%↑75%-2232.0%↑86%-5324.3%↑87%-8939.6%↑16%-13618.5%↑23%-17736.6%↓196%-5995.6%↓121%-2709.3%↓29%-2102.9%
ROE-61.5%↓37%———-41.7%↑82%-234.5%↑22%-300.2%↓186%-105.0%↓173%-38.5%
Total Debt$146.0K↓42%$146.0K↓42%$146.0K↓93%$146.0K↓96%$146.0K$146.0K$0$0$0
Shareholders' Equity$60.1M↓23%$60.1M↓23%$68.3M↑571%$74.2M↑337%$81.3M↑438%$15.1M↓48%$29.0M↓69%$94.0M↓44%$168.8M
Current Ratio7.51↓30%7.51↓30%10.83↑462%12.89↑415%10.46↑370%2.23↓44%3.96↓15%4.68↓64%13.07
Debt / Equity0.00↓25%0.00↓25%0.00↓99%0.00↓99%0.00↓81%0.010.000.000.00
Operating Cash Flow-$31.4M↓25%-$8.0M↓32%-$7.3M↓15%-$8.6M↓10%-$27.8M↓4%-$26.6M↑48%-$50.7M↑29%-$71.6M↓29%-$55.7M
Free Cash Flow-$31.8M↓26%-$8.1M↓32%-$7.4M↓17%-$8.7M↓12%-$27.9M↓3%-$27.1M↑49%-$52.7M↑31%-$75.8M↓34%-$56.7M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Automobiles and Trucks

LIDR vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$233000.00Bottom 25%
Net Income$34.0MBottom 25%
ROE-41.7%Bottom 25%
D/E0.00Top 25%
Op. Margin-13618.5%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio10.46Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
Tesla, Inc.TSLA$1.54T$390.22$94.8B$3.8B4.6%0.024.6%2.162/95/92/70/3F-Score 53/11
PACCAR INCPCAR$56.2B$106.66$28.4B$2.4B12.3%0.00——3/93/92/70/3F-Score 44/11
FORD MOTOR COF$47.6B$11.91$187.3B$8.2B-22.7%—-4.9%1.072/90/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
HONDA MOTOR CO LTDHMC$44.5B$34.30$145.0B$5.6B6.8%0.715.6%1.361/92/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INCMGA$16.0B$61.82$42.0B$829.0M6.6%0.38—1.253/92/92/70/3F-Score 63/11
BORGWARNER INCBWA$10.2B$50.89$14.3B$277.0M5.1%0.723.7%2.071/92/90/70/3F-Score 63/11
OSHKOSH CORPOSK$8.6B$141.78$10.4B$647.0M14.3%0.249.0%1.942/95/94/70/3F-Score 53/11
Aptiv PLCAPTV$7.8B$38.75$20.4B$165.0M1.8%0.825.8%1.744/90/90/73/3F-Score 85/11