LISATA THERAPEUTICS, INC.
LSTAAbout the company
Lisata Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company, engages in the discovery, development, and commercialization of therapies for the treatment of solid tumors and other diseases. Its investigational product is certepetide, which is in Phase 2 clinical studies for the treatment of solid tumors, such as metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, appendiceal cancer, and colon cancer and glioblastoma multiforme in combination with range of anti-cancer regimens.
Investment snapshot
Positive
0
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 13
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
—
No comparable estimates
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-06 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-16.5M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-16.0M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-15.9M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-89.88%, ROA=-93.47%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-122.2%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive0/16 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-115.3%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/16 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-12.3M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-94.26%; #4056/4519 (top 89.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-0.46 (2010) -> $-1.91 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/16 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-83.0%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts0% pass✗ 13▾
Split decision: 13 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 2)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (0/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (0/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability6% pass✓ 2✗ 33▾
15 of 16 flag LSTA's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/26 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/26 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-66.7%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-10711.2% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-16.5M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-177.4%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-93.47%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-57.10% -> -93.47% (delta: -36.38%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-89.88%, ROA=-93.47%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue-15008.0%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-177.4%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=0.7x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-74.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/16 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-16427.0%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-177.4%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-111.84%; #5440/6340 (top 85.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-177.35%; #4832/5226 (top 92.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.2366; #4392/5884 (top 74.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
11 of 12 flag LSTA's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities3.69✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation8% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾
12 of 13 flag LSTA's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio0.7x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share0.7x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-154.1%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-122.2%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.7x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low119% of trailing low ($1.02)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-111.84%; #5440/6340 (top 85.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.6306; #2418/6449 (top 37.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.74x✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+0.2%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.0076; #4888/5247 (top 93.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-94.26%; #4056/4519 (top 89.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-61.22%; #5425/6202 (top 87.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency25% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
6 of 8 flag LSTA's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio3.69✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-279.6%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-289.6%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY6.16 -> 5.76✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.03x -> 0.01x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities3.69✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 5.1% of shares last year, 7.4% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-09-30 2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex. | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.1Mcurrent | -- | -- | -- | $40.9Mest. | $21.0Mest. | $20.3Mest. | $28.4Mest. | $690.6Mest. |
| Revenue | $100.0K↓91% | $0 | $0↓100% | $0 | $170.0K↓83% | $1.0M | $0 | $0 | -- |
| Operating Income | -$22.0M↓10% | -$10.0M↓127% | -$4.0M↑18% | -$4.9M↑15% | -$18.2M↑19% | -$22.4M↑13% | -$25.7M↑55% | -$57.6M↓98% | -$29.1M |
| Net Income | -$17.2M↑6% | -$6.8M↓60% | -$2.9M↑37% | -$4.5M↑5% | -$16.6M↑17% | -$20.0M↑4% | -$20.8M↑62% | -$54.2M↓97% | -$27.5M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.73↓49% | $-0.32↑41% | $-0.50↑9% | $-1.91↑20% | $-2.40↑7% | $-2.58↑75% | $-10.47↓1994% | $-0.50 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -22043.0%↓1075% | — | — | — | -10711.2%↓378% | -2240.9% | — | — | — |
| ROE | -224.5%↓114% | — | — | — | -111.7%↓65% | -67.6%↓56% | -43.3%↑47% | -81.4%↓174% | -29.8% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $7.6M↓56% | $7.6M↓56% | $8.2M↓61% | $10.9M↓57% | $14.9M↓50% | $29.6M↓39% | $48.1M↓28% | $66.6M↓28% | $92.3M |
| Current Ratio | 14.09↑198% | 14.09↑198% | 3.69↓36% | 4.23↓44% | 5.76↓6% | 6.16↓25% | 8.18↓27% | 11.26↓47% | 21.27 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$21.7M↓26% | -$12.7M↓279% | -$2.6M↑33% | -$3.1M↑43% | -$15.9M↑18% | -$19.4M↑3% | -$20.0M↑5% | -$21.2M↑5% | -$22.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$21.7M | -$12.7M↓279% | -$2.6M↑33% | -$3.1M↑43% | -$16.0M↑17% | -$19.4M↑3% | -$20.0M↑7% | -$21.5M↑4% | -$22.3M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
LSTA vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |