MOLECULAR PARTNERS AG
MOLNAbout the company
Molecular Partners AG, a clinical-stage biotechnology company, designs and develops designed ankyrin repeat proteins therapeutics for the treatment of oncology diseases in Switzerland.
Investment snapshot
Positive
1
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 13
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
—
No comparable estimates
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-12 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.05, IC: -11.5x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.05✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities8.79✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.05✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.05✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-11.5x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.05✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0454; #982/4210 (top 23.3%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / Book Value per Share1.2x✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio1.2x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-568.7%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-568.7%, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xValuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-64.1%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-58.2%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=1.2x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($2.94)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-69.09%; #5213/6340 (top 82.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.9003; #1682/6449 (top 26.1%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share1.17x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-39.8%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.0000; #5080/5247 (top 96.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-58.24%; #3900/4519 (top 86.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-30.50%; #4437/6202 (top 71.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-76.1M✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-65.6M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-64.7M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-50.20%, ROA=-60.38%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-58.2%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive1/7 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-55.3%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/7 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-65.6M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-58.24%; #3900/4519 (top 86.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction$-1.74 (2019) -> $-2.08 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth-65.0%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Profitability6% pass✓ 2✗ 33▾
15 of 16 flag MOLN's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/8 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/8 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-31.9%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-1231.7% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-76.1M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)N/A (negative mean EPS)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-76.7%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-568.7%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-568.7%, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-60.38%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-34.09% -> -60.38% (delta: -26.29%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-50.20%, ROA=-60.38%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-76.7%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=1.2x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-50.0% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/7 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-76.7%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-69.09%; #5213/6340 (top 82.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-76.74%; #4455/5226 (top 85.2%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.3577; #4724/5884 (top 80.3%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/7 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾
Split decision: 13 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 2)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Efficiency25% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
6 of 8 flag MOLN's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio8.79✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-725.7%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-735.7%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY14.31 -> 8.79✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.03x -> 0.00x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities8.79✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital-54.7%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-26.8%; FY2024: ROIC=-33.6%; FY2025: ROIC=-54.7%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)1/5 years above 12% (latest -54.7%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 0.0% of shares last year, 11.1% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
| Metric | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $112.7Mcurrent | $208.3Mest. | $173.8Mest. | $232.5Mest. | $883.2Mest. |
| Revenue | $0↓100% | $5.5M↓34% | $8.3M↓96% | $205.5M↑1825% | $10.7M |
| Operating Income | -$73.4M↓8% | -$67.8M↑6% | -$72.5M↓157% | $126.4M↑282% | -$69.4M |
| Net Income | -$77.9M↓30% | -$59.8M↑19% | -$73.5M↓158% | $127.7M↑283% | -$69.8M |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.08↓18% | $-1.76↑21% | $-2.24↓158% | $3.84↑270% | $-2.25 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -1231.7%↓42% | -868.3%↓1512% | 61.5%↑109% | -650.2% |
| ROE | -76.7%↓101% | -38.2%↓9% | -35.1%↓170% | 50.1%↑184% | -59.5% |
| Total Debt | $4.6M↑70% | $2.7M↓38% | $4.3M↓18% | $5.3M↓20% | $6.6M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $101.5M↓35% | $156.8M↓25% | $209.2M↓18% | $254.8M↑117% | $117.4M |
| Current Ratio | 8.79↓39% | 14.31↑7% | 13.35↓10% | 14.77↑322% | 3.50 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.05↑163% | 0.02↓17% | 0.02 | 0.02↓63% | 0.06 |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$64.7M↑1% | -$65.6M↑6% | -$70.0M↓154% | $128.5M↑229% | -$99.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$65.6M↑1% | -$66.4M↑6% | -$70.6M↓156% | $127.2M↑226% | -$100.6M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
MOLN vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |