MESABI TRUST
MSBAbout the company
Mesabi Trust, a royalty trust, engages in iron ore mining business in the United States. Mesabi Trust was incorporated in 1961 and is based in New York, New York.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$51.71
+218.6% vs price
Models with upside
2 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
MSB undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $16.23 (median $51.71)
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | BUY | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +80.7% | +15.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Balance sheet at 2026-07-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-09-11 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2025-04-24 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models100% pass✓ 2▾
MSB undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $16.23 (median $51.71)
Pabrai fair value$84.27✓Pabrai+80.7% margin vs $16.23Akre fair value$19.15✓Akre+15.2% margin vs $16.23
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 5✗ 23▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio9.1x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=None, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)2.3x✓Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share9.1x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation Reasonableness✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF Yield✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=9.1x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($16.23)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+43.80%; #154/6340 (top 2.4%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.0826; #4839/6449 (top 75.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share9.13x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+97.2%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.4630; #2737/5247 (top 52.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-47.93%; #5080/6202 (top 81.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Efficiency0% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion
Current Ratio✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.86x -> 0.97x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2022: ROIC=unavailable; FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾
11 of 12 flag MSB's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Growth13% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾
7 of 8 flag MSB's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency16/16 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth195.3%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR25.2%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Verdicts14% pass✓ 2✗ 12▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 BUY · 1 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (0/9)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Profitability19% pass✓ 15✗ 20▾
13 of 16 flag MSB's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +10 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/16 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)16/16 years positive✓BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)180.4%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE399.8%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=None, ROC=None✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets91.69%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY71.12% -> 91.69% (delta: +20.57%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=92.34%, ROA=91.69%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY83.0% -> 94.6%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity399.8%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=9.1x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity178.9% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency16/16 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity399.8%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+43.80%; #154/6340 (top 2.4%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+91.69%; #170/3702 (top 4.6%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+399.84%; #19/5226 (top 0.4%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.3027; #4615/5884 (top 78.4%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Cash Flow30% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾
7 of 10 flag MSB's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Pabrai +4 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$93.9M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=92.34%, ROA=91.69%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)2.3x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF Yield✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency16/16 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2024. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2024
Retired 0.0% of shares last year, 0.0% over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- $17.7M
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2025-10-31 2024-11-01 – 2025-10-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating cash flow, dividends paid. | Q2 FY 2027 2026-05-01 – 2026-07-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, dividends paid. | Q1 FY 2027 2026-02-01 – 2026-04-30 Sources | FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
| FY 2020Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $212.9Mcurrent | -- | -- | $244.9Mest. | $189.1Mest. | $219.4Mest. | $235.6Mest. | $190.4Mest. |
| Revenue | $20.8M↓79% | $2.5M↓56% | $2.2M↓53% | $98.6M↑331% | $22.9M↑195% | $7.7M↓89% | $71.5M↑175% | $26.0M |
| Operating Income | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Net Income | $17.2M↓81% | -$95.0K↓102% | $1.1M↓70% | $93.3M↑391% | $19.0M↑258% | $5.3M↓92% | $68.8M↑194% | $23.4M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 94.6%↑14% | 83.0%↑21% | 68.6%↓29% | 96.2%↑7% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROE | 81.6%↓15% | — | — | 399.8%↑342% | 90.5%↑95% | 46.4%↓79% | 223.3%↑57% | 142.1% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $21.1M↓78% | $17.6M↓23% | $18.3M↓6% | $23.3M↑11% | $21.0M↑83% | $11.4M↓63% | $30.8M↑87% | $16.5M |
| Current Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | $19.4M↓79% | $249.1K↓94% | $533.7K↓74% | $93.9M↑543% | $14.6M↑5% | $13.9M↓78% | $62.8M↑202% | $20.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Trading
MSB vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REALTY INCOME CORPO | $56.1B | $58.82 | $5.7B | $1.1B | 2.7% | 0.63 | 16.8% | — | 2/7 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/10 |
| Ventas, Inc.VTR | $47.0B | $88.92 | $5.8B | $261.5M | 2.1% | 1.04 | 3.5% | — | 2/7 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 2/10 |
| RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INCRJF | $32.4B | $168.64 | $15.9B | $2.1B | 17.1% | 0.28 | — | — | 3/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| ROYAL GOLD INCRGLD | $21.7B | $256.89 | $1.0B | $466.3M | 6.5% | 0.13 | 61.9% | 3.12 | 4/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETFETHA | $19.4B | $44.02 | — | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KIMCO REALTY CORPKIM | $17.0B | $25.55 | $2.1B | $584.7M | 5.6% | 0.74 | 36.0% | — | 3/7 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/10 |
| LandBridge Co LLCLB | $5.6B | $73.15 | $199.1M | $30.1M | 8.9% | 1.65 | 59.5% | 4.87 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| Digital Turbine, Inc.APPS | $927.6M | $7.61 | $565.3M | $37.7M | -19.6% | 1.88 | 6.0% | 1.16 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 0/11 |